Policy Sections
Mini Sections
The EU is currently losing R&D investment to other countries. In 2001 the net outflow of R&D funding from the EU amounted to over six billion euro. The Commission thinks that the FP7 can provide the necessary framework conditions to attract more foreign R&D investment.
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is investment of foreign assets directly into a domestic company's structures, equipment, and organisations. It does not include foreign investment into the stock markets.
FDI in Research and Development (R&D) means investment in creative work undertaken systematically to increase the stock of knowledge and its application - including basic research, applied research, and experimental development.
The 1980s saw a boost in international co-operation in R&D and large multinational entreprises increasingly started to spread R&D activities outside their home countries. Strategic alliances and co-opearation have helped enterprise to access foreign technologies and markets, to minimise risks and to overcome the (often high) costs of technological development.
Today's increasingly global economy has lead to the internationalisation of research and development (R&D). Until now, crossborder flows of R&D have mainly been (currently 80 per cent) confined to the United States, Japan and Europe. This tendency now seems to be changing in favour of countries such as China, India and Brazil.
Drivers of foreign corporate R&D
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in R&D has two different motivations: doing 'adaptive' R&D and getting access to 'state-of-the-art' knowledge. The 'adaptive' R&D modifies products, processes and technologies according to local needs and supports foreign production facilities. Getting access to 'state-of-the-art' knowledge means that companies invest in foreign countries with a view to benefiting from excellent, local research and researchers.
It seems that FDI positively affects the growth of recipient countries as it decreases the costs of R&D through stimulating innovation. Policies to attract FDI have accordingly increased in importance and become a source of competition among developed and developing countries.
Factors attracting FDI
Traditional factors attracting foreign direct investment include access to natural resources, markets, and low-cost labour.
Other, more recent determinants and methods used by policymakers to attract FDI include:
According to a study conducted by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs among company executives, the most critical location factors for FDI in R&D are:
The costs do not seem to be a principal determining factor in decisions to invest in foreign R&D facilities. Access to markets, skilled people, facilities and standards count more.
The United States is often given as an example of an attractive location for foreign R&D investors because of:
The availability of a skilled workforce and the increasing number of consumers in the former eastern bloc, China and India is making these regions increasingly attractive for business R&D. Business sector
increasingly perceives India as an R&D hub for a wide range of industries.
And Europe?
The Commission thinks that the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7) can provide the necessary framework conditions to attract foreign R&D investment. Indeed, among other things, the current proposal for FP7 envisages:
The Science and Research Commissioner Janez Potocnik
thinks that Europe must maximise its attractiveness as a location for private research investment. "This will require a broad policy mix encompassing various fiscal incentives, improved framework conditions, qualified human resources, effective intellectual property regimes and basic and applied research infrastructures", he said at a conference
on the internationalisation of R&D in March 2005.
Creating more favourable conditions for FDI is therefore a "better strategy than reacting with protectionism which chooses to underline only the dangers and threats", he added.
However, Potočnik cautions that the EU must take into account and mitigate the risks associated with overseas R&D investments - such as the 'brain drain' of skilled European researchers and Europe losing out in certain sectors (pharmaceuticals, biotechnology) as European firms invest in R&D elsewhere.
Table 1: The percentage of the total gross domestic expenditure on R&D (GERD) by foreign funds for years 1994, 2002 and 2003.
|
Country |
2002 | 1994 |
| Latvia 2003: 20.4 | 35.6 | 22.8 (1995) |
| Greece 2003: 18.1 | 21.4 (2001) | 18.6 (1995) |
| Austria 2003: 21.0 | 21.7 | 4.2 |
| United Kingdom 2003: 19.4 | 20.5 | 12.4 |
| Cyprus 2003: 13.9 | 15.1 | 8.0 (1998) |
| Estonia 2003: 15.2 | 14.4 | 6.2 (1998) |
| Belgium 2003: 12.9 | 11.8 (2001) | 7.9 |
| The Netherlands 2003: 11.3 | 11.0 (2001) | 8.8 |
| Hungary 2003: 10.7 | 10.4 | 3.7 |
| Ireland 2003: 8.5 | 8.9 (2000) | 8.5 |
| France 2003: 8.4 | 8.0 | 8.3 |
| Denmark 2003: 10.3 | 7.8 (2001) | 11.0 (1995) |
| EU-15 | 8.3 | 6.5 |
| EU-25 | 8.2 | 6.7 (1995) |
| Lithuania 2003: 13.8 | 7.1 | 6.7 (2000) |
| Spain 2003: 5.7 | 6.8 | 6.4 |
| Italy | 6.2 (1996) | 6.1 |
| Portugal 2003: 5.0 | 5.1 | 11.9 (1995) |
| Poland 2003: 4.6 | 4.8 | 1.4 |
| Slovenia 2003: 9.9 | 3.7 | 2.6 |
| Sweden 2003: 7.3 | 3.4 (2001) | 3.4 (1995) |
| Finland 2003: 3.1 | 3.1 | 4.5 (1995) |
| Czech Republic 2003: 4.6 | 2.7 | 3.3 (1995) |
| Germany 2003: 2.3 | 2.4 | 1.7 |
| Slovakia 2003: 3.3 | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Luxembourg 2003: 8.3 | 1.6 | no data |
| Malta | 21.7 | no data |
| Romania | 7.0 | 0.6 |
| Bulgaria | 5.0 | 0.04 (1995) |
| Croatia | 1.5 | no data |
| Turkey | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| The United States | no data | no data |
Source: Eurostat (Statistics and Technology: Statistics in focus
7/2005
and 15/2006
)
While FDI in R&D has generally positive impacts, many governments remain concerned over the globalisation of R&D. The underlying issue is whether they are net recipients or net sources of FDI - making all the difference in the share of benefits.
The benefits and beneficiaries
For an FDI recipient country the benefits include:
However, receiving FDI also means accepting foreign control over domestic R&D resources and loss of economic benefits if the results of R&D are exploited elsewhere.
For the source of FDI the benefits include:
But, being the source of FDI also means facing the loss of jobs, technical capability and of economic benefits if the results are exploited locally.