EurActiv Logo
 
3 December 2008
Breaking News:

Analysis: Security and the Two-Level Game: The Treaty of Prüm, the EU and the Management of Threats 

Published: Friday 3 February 2006   

In their need to secure their borders against threats from terrorism, crime and illegal immigration, member states, by acting in small groups, may be undermining the security of all, argue Thierry BalzacqDidier Bigo, Sergio Carrera and Elspeth Guild in this paper from the Centre for European Policy Studies.

CEPS Abstract

On 27 May 2005, seven Member States signed the Prüm Convention to step up cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism, cross-border crime and illegal migration. Named after the German city in which it was signed, the Treaty’s main advantage is that it enables the signatories to speed up the exchange of information. However, this paper argues that the Treaty produces negative externalities for the European Union’s area of freedom, security and justice by circumventing the EU framework. First, by keeping the Convention under a multilateral umbrella, the signatories create a hierarchy within the EU. Second, by reverting to an intergovernmental arena, the European Parliament is ignored precisely at a time when it is achieving an increasingly central role in law-making in this field. As a result, Prüm weakens the EU more than it strengthens it, and under many circumstances, it simply cannot provide the way forward to the establishment of a manageable area of freedom, security and justice. 

To read the article in full please click hereexternal .

IMPORTANT: 'Letters To The Editor' documents are commentaries by external contributors. EurActiv - as a neutral platform - does not state policy positions of its own. Any opinions in 'Letters to the Editor' documents are those of the author only.
Advertising
Advertising