Published: Monday 16 August 2004
| Updated: Friday 4 May 2007
The Commission announced on 16 October the results of a new study on the impact of its upcoming REACH proposals for the chemical sector, showing that the overall impact in terms of GDP will be negligible.
According to the Commission's new figures, the overall costs
of its new legislation will be substantially lower than its own
earlier estimates. The revision of the draft proposal which was
posted for the Internet stakeholder consultation has led to a
reduction of over 10 billion euro in costs. The overall costs to
the chemicals industry and its downstream users would be between
2.8 and 5.2 billion euro over a period of 11 years.
On the other hand, the anticipated benefits to
environment and human health are expected to be much bigger than
the costs of the new legislation. DG Environment Director Jos
Delbeke pointed to an indicative scenario that estimates health
benefits to be in the order of 50 billion euro over a 30 year
period.
The chemicals industry and the NGOs were briefed on the new
impact assessment by the Commission's services.
CEFIC, the European Chemical Industry Council,
pointed to the big differences between the Commission's new figures
and earlier studies undertaken for industry in France (Mercer) and
Germany (Arthur D. Little). CEFIC criticised that the new
assessment by the Commission "focuses mainly on the issue of costs.
In Cefic’s view it should also examine the broader induced
effects on the EU economy, such as employment, investment, time to
market, loss of know-how, etc.". CEFIC therefore reiterates its
demand for an independent and extended impact assessment of the new
proposals.
The environmental NGOs welcomed the Commission's
new figures and stated that they "expose the industry's
scaremongering". In a joint press release,
Greenpeace and the European Environmental Bureau
(EEB) regretted that the REACH proposals had been weakened
over the summer and urged the Commission to "revive the
policy’s initial aims and stop giving in to industry and US
pressure".