Philip Lowe, the head of the Commission's directorate-general for energy, criticised EU governments for obstructing binding rules to promote energy efficiency, as part of efforts to meet the bloc's aspirational goal of a 20% cut in energy use by 2020.
In June, EU Energy Commissioner Günther Oettinger proposed rules obliging energy firms to cut energy sales by 1.5% each year, and requiring 3% of public buildings annually to be given an energy-efficient makeover (see details).
Lowe said the Commission made its proposal after EU governments refused to consider making the bloc's 20% energy efficiency target legally binding.
"But the conclusion of the last meeting [with governments] was 'well, we don't really like binding measures either'," he said, following an informal meeting of EU energy ministers in Poland last week.
"So they don't like binding targets or binding measures, and yet they regard energy efficiency as the most important priority of the European Union. Sorry, but we must stop this," Lowe told an EU energy policy seminar held by the Brussels-based think-tank Bruegel.
The EU's efficiency goal is designed to cut Europe's carbon emissions while also keeping a lid on an energy import bill that currently amounts to about €270 billion a year for oil and €40 billion for gas.
But the EU is falling far short of its goal, and is set to only achieve about 9% efficiency gains by 2020.
Oettinger has said he will give EU countries two years to get energy efficiency savings back on track before proposing legally binding targets.
EurActiv with Reuters





COMMENTS
Phil is speaking sense. But it goes a bit further than “double speak” and well into the realms of double-think-no-action. Did you know that property owners in London are keen supporters of the Tailban?
A stroll around anywhere in Central London will highlight the fact that whilst they may not have “double glazing salesmen shot on sight” signs up they might just as well (historic buildings doncha’ know – and other excuses too pathetic to list).
Of course the energy sources to heat these incontinent buildings comes from, increasingly, gas. Notice the UK has built new gas import terminals, notice that the gas comes from theocratic dictators in the middle east (who are also London property owners). The self same gas salesmen also fund the Taliban (and other freedom fighting co-religionists - Euro40bn buys a lot os bullets & guns from the Euro Death Industries). I find it surprising that property owners in London, such as the Duke of Westminster, are Taliban supports – still life’s funny, perhaps he owns shares in various coffin makers as well?
These are speculations and perhaps the good Duke (net worth circa £50bn) is unaware of double glazing and its energy saving properties (ditto other London property owners including the UK government) and has yet to make the connection between what his tennats pay in gas and who funds the Tailban. Don’t laugh at this, the former chairman of Barclays bank (2007) had to be shown how to use a …. Cash machine (Private Eye No 1297 – page 10). Thus it is quite possible that with respect to energy saving, our erected representatives and their acolytes are completely clueless in this area, hence double-speak, double-think-no-action (or perhaps clueless and hypocritical would be closer to the mark?).
Not wishing to be seen as unfair to London, one could extend these comments to any number of Euro capitals (hi Brussels).
The COM is totally wrong in defining energy efficiency as energy savings or cut of sales. Energy efficiency must be a relative term, measuring energy consumption to an amount of goods produced or value added. If energy efficiency is measured in absloute terms, like the COM does it, then you could be more energy efficient if you would shut down your industry.
If we look at plenty new buildings signed by top architects we are able to understand how far is these goals: Such energy mistakes made by professional what expect fom the normal citizan?
EurActiv reserves its right to remove comments regarded as offensive, racist, or homophobic as well as hate-speech in general. Spamming or posts with an obvious commercial character will be removed as well. Thank you for your understanding.