EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU biofuels claim challenged by academic study

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 31 July 2012, updated 10 June 2013

German researchers have unveiled evidence suggesting that EU claims, according to which locally-produced rapeseed biodiesel cut back at least 38% of greenhouse gases (GHG) compared with fossil fuels,  are unfounded.

Two experts at Jena’s Schiller University in eastern Germany used the same calculation system as that applied by the European Commission, but found that in eight out of 12 scenarios rapeseed biodiesel failed to meet the 35% GHG savings level or threshold stipulated by the 2009 renewable energy directive, and normally falls below 30%.

The findings by academics Gernot Pehnelt and Christoph Vietze come as the rapeseed harvest is in full swing in producing countries, such as France and Germany – and prices for the feedstock are increasing.

Biofuel use is increasing in attempt to cut emissions

They also coincide with new proposals to cut carbon emissions from new cars to 95 grams per kilometre – partly by relying more extensively on blending biofuels with conventional petrol and diesel. Civil and military aviation is also stepping up the experimental use of biofuels in jet engines.

The German experts used publicly available data for their research, which they claimed is more comprehensive than other independent analysis, but said their investigations had been hampered by the EU’s refusal to release all its data. Requests for information from the Joint Research Centre went unanswered, they said.

The EU’s lack of transparency has already been challenged by NGOs such as ClientEarth and the authors claimed this added weight to the “simple and unavoidable” conclusion that the Brussels data on rapeseed oil’s alleged GHG savings is deliberately over-stated, and “political” rather than “scientific”.

Commission defends data

A spokeswoman for the Commission declined to comment specifically on the report, but said: “Different studies can come to different results, depending on the assumptions used.”

She did, however, defend the Commission data, stating that “the figures used as default values by the Commission are the result of a comprehensive process including input from world leading experts, where all input data and assumptions are freely available.”

She added: “The claim that data would not be shared by the Commission is not correct, all data is published on the JRC's website.”

The new study’s authors suggested that EU biofuels policy may – as claimed by some NGOs – be a form of industrial policy in all but name and be driven by “green protectionism” to exclude imported sources of biodiesel on behalf of European agri-business.

 “Our results indicate that the ‘sustainability’ of rapeseed biodiesel in the interpretation of the renewable energy directive (RED) is at best very questionable and in most scenarios simply unjustifiable,” the study’s authors said.

Positions: 

“What we need is transparency. The EC hesitates to publish all the background data and promises to come up with new calculations for individual biofuels but they have not come up with any values yet,” according to Jena University’s Dr Gernot Pehnelt, one of the report’s authors.

“They don’t provide any transparency. We want to compare our method with their method and background data – and that’s the best way for discussing whether rapeseed biofuel and others are sustainable or not,” Pehnelt added.

Next steps: 
  • 2012: European Commission scheduled to announce new indirect land use sustainability criteria for biofuels. 
  • 2014: Renewable Energy Directive due to be reviewed
  • 2020: Deadline for EU target of 10% of transport fuels to be met by renewable energy
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Whether the data is accurate or not does not really matter. A simple back of the envelope calculation quickly shows that relying on biofuels is unrealistic. See Prof. MacKay, science adviser at the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change. Suppose average cars, travelling at moderate speed on a one lane road and with 80m between each other. Suppose we grow the biofuel plantation along that road. How wide would that plantation need to be? About 8km! So for a typical 2-lane motorway that would be 32km… For details see:
    http://withouthotair.blogspot.be/2012/03/tedx-talk-people-power-area.html

    By :
    Fab
    - Posted on :
    01/08/2012
  • The EZ has the only green scheme(s) that actually cost more to the taxpayers, who must work longer hours to pay for these green schemes; ergo use more energy that generates more hot air! I mean we pay nations not to cut down forest, they in turn plant palm trees for the supply of palm oil. The same nations sell it back to us, whilst carbon trading is hovering in the background vacuuming up loose money. The same nations who now produce supposedly green oils are now starving because all arable land is turned over to oil...Who is going to feed Germany, Spain, France and Italy when all their land is turned over to oil? Do these nations also collect farming subsidies for oil? And why? Has anybody done a real audit on these supposedly green schemes? Can anybody do sums (sometimes called maths) these days?

    By :
    herbert samuel booth
    - Posted on :
    01/08/2012
  • This woman spokesperson for the Commission is clearly brainwashed by the system that likes its research to say what the commission would like to see in print even if that fact is false. The problem with EC is that all their advisers are paid handsomely to bend the truth and where this invariably bows to the wishes of their EC paymasters. Clearly these commission advisers are not really independent but specifically selected as 'yes' men or women. That is why the EU is in the terrible mess as we find ourselves today, as the truth is covered over for the many vested-interests that reside within the commission. The plain truth is that until the EC starts a process of openness and full transparency, the people of Europe will always get the worst of all worlds. Indeed not until corruption and personal rewards are taken out of the equation and true 'independent' advisers are the norm that are commissioned to act on behalf of the EU and the people of Europe, the EU will continue to go down the innovation and economic tube. Independence of thought and a non-vested culture is what Europe needs more than anything else. Until that happens we in Europe have very little to look forward too.

    Dr David Hill
    Chief Executive
    World Innovation Foundation
    United Kingdom - Switzerland

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    04/08/2012
rapeseed: price pumping
Background: 

Germany, Spain, France and Italy are the EU’s biggest producers of rapeseed oil – and home to the bulk of its auto industry, which actively promotes the use of biodiesel in reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

European biodiesel output (up to 10 million tonnes a year) relies heavily on rapeseed oil but this year’s crop may be a million tonnes less than in 2011, at 18 million tonnes, forcing up prices.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Transport Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising