EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Belgium shuts two nuclear reactors amid safety concerns

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 17 August 2012

Belgium’s nuclear regulator has questioned the safety of the Electrabel-operated Doel 3 reactor due to cracks in the pressure vessels that have already forced the shutdown of a similar unit at the Tihange nuclear plant.

Belgium has halted the 1,006-megawatt Doel 3 reactor until at least the end of August after the discovery of suspected cracks in the pressure vessel. But it is possible that the reactor could be shut down for good.

Willy De Roovere, who heads the FANC regulator agency, said it was always hard for a company to meet a requirement to prove a nuclear plant is safe.

He told a news conference that Electrabel, the Belgian unit of France’s GDF Suez, would have to show that "in a period of the remaining lifetime there is no single risk, there is no risk at all that cracks can go [on to produce leaks]."

A spokeswoman for Electrabel said, as quoted by Reuters: "Is it safe or not to continue the production of Doel 3? That's what we will have to prove to the FANC."

The vessel in question was built by now-defunct Dutch company Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij, which also constructed the pressure vessel for another Belgian unit, Tihange 2, as well as parts for nuclear plants throughout Europe and in the Americas.

The Belgian agency BELGA reported that Tihange 2 was halted yesterday, as it has the same pressure vessel as Doel.

“I would like to remind that Doel 3 and Tihange 2 have been halted and do not represent any danger for the population, the workers and the environment,” De Roovere was quoted as saying.

Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij was also responsible for two units in Germany that are no longer operating, two in the Netherlands, two in Spain, one in Sweden, two in Switzerland, 10 in the United States and one in Argentina, said the Paris-based Nuclear Energy Agency, an agency within the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development..

Nuclear specialists from the countries where the Dutch vessels are in use are due to meet in Brussels today (17 August).

De Roovere said it was doubtful the Doel operations would resume before the end of September and that regulators would meet again in October to discuss the issue.

Stress tests

The Doel 3 reactor had been scheduled to close in 10 years' time, according to a nuclear exit plan the Belgian government adopted in July.

GDF Suez is expected to trim significantly its 47-year-old nuclear business now that Belgium, the only nation where it operates nuclear plants, is phasing out its reliance on atomic power.

Belgium has long considered a complete exit from nuclear energy (see background), but that will depend on its having enough alternative sources of energy in place.

EU member states are each responsible for determining policy on nuclear power and on the energy mix in general.

However, the European Commission has initiated a series of voluntary stress tests as part of efforts to ensure safety following Japan's Fukushima nuclear disaster.

They were meant to be completed before the Commission's August summer break, but governments have been given extra time for further assessments.

Speaking in Essen, Germany, EU Energy Commissioner Günther Oettinger said he expected the stress tests to be completed in October and that they would include the assessment from regulators about risks associated with the possible cracks in the Belgian unit.

"In the coming weeks, we expect clear results from the Belgium regulators about possible risks," he said, as quoted by Reuters.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • "Stress test" ? hard not to refer to those conducted in the financial sector by national and european supervisors - and hard not to reach the same concusion : they do not work !

    Easy, though, to discern the same flaw in both cases: the reluctance of national authorities (public as well as private) to mutualize control under EU authority and their refusal to relinquish any part of their power to take decisions like the closing of a dangerous reactor (or a dangerous bank !).

    Euratom treaty provides for some degree of cooperation between national nuclear authorities but falls far short
    of a true common security policy which would necessitate a treaty revision. (see "www.uef.fr") JG GIRAUD

    By :
    Jean-Guy Giraud
    - Posted on :
    17/08/2012
  • During the times that the Doel 3 and Tihange 2 reactor vessels must have been under construction I held several positions in The Rotterdamsche Droogdok ( RDM)Quality Assurance Department among which chief welding engineer, chief material engineer and manager.
    In those positions between 1969 and 1979 I never had , in my recollection,any dealings with Belgian pressure vessel authorities.

    Henceforth the assertion that the RDM built those reactor vessels is highly dubious. It is more likely that we forged some of the rings as a subcontractor to whoever built the reactor vessels.

    And I cannot imagine that those rings passed quality control if defective.

    By :
    JAn Laan
    - Posted on :
    18/08/2012
  • the BIG problem is not finance crisis in Europe. It may well be far more serious kind hiding in the old reactors.Japan is not far,when it comes to global pollution by nuclear radiation. There are plenty of potential hazards closer to home. who is the responsible body of authority?

    By :
    Pekka Oinonen
    - Posted on :
    21/08/2012
  • For JAn Laan: From IAEA tables, the official supplier was FRAMCEC, which I would translate as a joint company between FRamatome and Ateliers de Construction Electrique de Charleroi. So these parts could have been made under quite strict control from "Framatome + ACEC" QA and QC. So, you think the weldings would have been made elsewhere afterwards? That is possible. But it seems that more than twenty vessels "parts" were made at RDM. It is also likely that only one shell, the part of the reactor vessel at Doel3 is having "cracks" as some otehr owners have confirmed that they have never found anything wrong so far.

    On an other "blog", some oen asked a technical question: do you know the answer to this?

    "The atomic hydrogen should be removed during the special vacuum casting process and the following cool down process until the temperature is about 650 C (1200F) Below the 650 C the atomic hydrogen becomes molecular hydrogen. Those molecules raise local the pressure to several hundred Mpa (>>15.106 psi.
    During the forging process the gas bubbles and cracks are forged to flat indication.
    The information on the Belgian FANC site is confusing to me. Who know how a dehydrogenation process takes place during forging? And how to remove molecular hydrogen from the cast during the forging process?

    Dak! Merci!

    By :
    Frankie PERK
    - Posted on :
    22/08/2012
  • For Frankie,
    During the forging process the temperature is that high and the steel micro structure ( gamma iron)such that one only has atomic hydrogen in solid solution.The forging process homogenizes the material and welds any imperfections that did exist.
    Upon cooling after subsequent heat treatment atomic hydrogen can not stay in solution(Alpha iron)and gradually diffuses out of the work piece over time.
    Atomic hydrogen is very mobile in solid steel at room temperature.

    Conclusion; one cannot remove hydrogen during forging.

    By :
    Jan Laan
    - Posted on :
    22/08/2012
Background: 

Belgium has seven nuclear reactors at two plants, Doel and Tihange, owned by GDF Suez unit Electrabel. In 2009, atomic energy provided 55% of the country's electricity generation.

In 2009, Belgium decided to keep its oldest nuclear reactors running for 10 years longer than planned in 2003, but this change never came into force as the government that decided the measure lost power.

In 2011, the country’s political parties reached a conditional agreement to shut down the three oldest reactors by 2015 and to abandon of nuclear energy by 2025. The agreement is conditional on finding enough energy from alternative sources to prevent shortages.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising