EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Cameron pushes energy efficiency as motor of green growth

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 February 2013, updated 10 June 2013

The UK must prioritise growth in "green industries" such as energy efficiency and renewable energy, David Cameron said on Monday. The remarks are likely to antagonise those Tory MPs who have campaigned for cuts to green energy subsidies and the watering down of climate targets.

The prime minister has come under fire from environmentalists for a perceived lack of leadership on environmental issues, with the chief executive of WWF UK, David Nussbaum, warning in November "he seems to have lost his voice" and that his "continued silence would be a betrayal not just of election promises, but of the UK national interest." Last week, former US vice president Al Gore said he was "worried there are influences in his party that have backed him [Cameron] off [action on climate change]."

But speaking at the low-profile launch of an energy efficiency programme on Monday, Cameron said that "to those who say we just can't afford to prioritise green energy right now, my view is we can't afford not to".

He said the "green deal" loan scheme launched in January, which has attracted criticism for high interest rates and upfront fees, would cut carbon emissions and bills, and create jobs.

"Make no mistake, we are in a global race and the countries that succeed in that race, the economies in Europe that will prosper are those that are the greenest and the most energy-efficient. Energy consumption is set to grow by a third over the next two decades alone. And in a race for limited resources it is the energy-efficient that will win that race," he said. He added that "it is the countries that prioritise green energy that will secure the biggest share of jobs and growth."

According to the CBI, the green economy is now worth more than £120bn a year, or 8% of GDP, and was one of the few areas of the economy to experience growth in 2012.

Within days of taking office in 2010, Cameron promised to lead the "greenest government ever", but the coalition has been criticised for backing plans for up to 40 new gas-fired power stations that would endanger climate targets, giving new tax breaks to fossil fuel industries and hamstringing a flagship green investment bank.

Last June, the government was accused of lobbying to water down an EU-wide agreement on energy efficiency, leading to a cut in targets for the efficiency of buildings and appliances by 2020. A high-profile speech by Cameron on the environment was scheduled for last April, but downgraded at the last minute.

John Alker, Director of Policy and Communications at the UK Green Building Council, said: "We shouldn't underestimate the importance of the prime minister nailing his colours to the mast on energy efficiency, which is hugely welcome. It gives industry more confidence that the government does take this issue seriously, which is urgently needed if businesses are going to invest and innovate. Now Cameron needs to stand up to those in government who simply don't 'get it' and follow up the rhetoric with delivery."

Mike Barry, head of sustainable business at Marks & Spencer, who has previously been critical of the government for creating uncertainty for businesses undertaking green measures, said it was "great" to hear the prime minister was supportive of green growth, but said business "now need[s] long- term policy to get to next level."

Positions: 

Renewable Energy Association chief executive Gaynor Hartnell said: “The Prime Minister’s words are welcome. Whilst the Government has an impressive list of policy measures in place, there is a great deal of uncertainty on Electricity Market Reform, Feed-in Tariffs and even the Renewable Heat Incentive. Confidence needs to be boosted and it seems David Cameron acknowledges this.”

Next steps: 
  • April 2013: EU member states present their national programmes for the implementation of the Energy Efficiency Directive.
  • May 2014: EU member states must prepare schemes for their energy companies to deliver annual energy savings of 1.5%
  • 2014, 2016: European Commission to review the directive.
  • 2020: Deadline for EU states to meet voluntary 20% energy-efficiency target
Adam Vaughan for the Guardian, part of the Guardian Environment Network

COMMENTS

  • Why is there so much fuss about this issue?

    I read that there are a trough of programmes and projects around the UK and elsewhere across the European Union where a British and a Dutch company (both using the same procedures) have developed both an environmentally acceptable and a cost effective process to turn Biomass from Waste Sources including that from Municipal Solid Waste and Farming and Agriculture, and Industrial and Commercial, and Sewage Sludge and Animal Manures and the likes to the production of the Renewable fuels such as ethanol and butanol for use in Road Transport. From the information I have gleaned from this journal, the EurActiv, over the past few years this Company is flying in the face of major opposition to build these projects in various countries across the EU to start building these as a secure alternative to the use of incineration gasification and other ATT process routes at between a third and a quarter of the capital cost of building these. But there are other very significant benefits.
    These projects deliver:
    1] A Secure Long-term solution for Treating Residual Biomass from any source including Wastes and in particular that from Municipal Solid Waste,
    2] It meets all the issues raised by those parties who see the polluting issues of incineration gasification and ATT process routes by being totally enclosed within a water-based system and thus eliminates the issues of emissions to the atmosphere: in other words there is no need for any chimneys, no emissions of carcinogens such as dioxins, no emissions of particulates, no odour, no smokes and the likes;
    3] Turning the Residual Biomass to the Renewable fuels like ethanol and/or butanol thus avoiding the interminable debate over food versus fuel,
    4] Meets the ILUC issues,
    5] Provides a Renewable fuel which complies fully with the Fuel Quality Directive,
    6] Provides over 30% of the fuel needed for Road Transport in the UK (more so in other countries) simply by using the Residual Waste Biomass derived from Municipal Sources ALONE! This therefore betters the aspirations and aims of the European Union “20-20 Vision to substitute 20% Renewable Fuels for Road Transport.
    7] The added benefit thus of being able to pay off the debt incurred to build and operate such plants within 4 to 6 years.
    8] By implementing this solution, this development would save the:
    a] UK TAX PAYERS over €13 billion /£11 billion before 2022 – which is 2/3rd the cost of the budgeted costs for building proposed incineration gasification or ATT plants that are currently being proposed to treat the residual waste and biomass found within Municipal Solid Waste in York, Leeds. Cheshire, Hertfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Surrey, West Berkshire and in London or in Glasgow, Edinburgh and elsewhere in Scotland, and in Northern Ireland and Wales,
    b] Reduce the total quantity of oil imported in to the UK by over £11 billion a year significantly affecting BALANCE OF PAYMENTS issue on US $ expenditure in OIL IMPORTS.

    There is no comparator position to this innovative solution and the UK Government are missing this by intransigence of doing the old old thing of using processes and systems that are dated. This is all the more surprising therefore for here there is a need to provide a cost effective solution to make Renewable fuels that do not use Food Crops - using Residual Biomass derived from Waste fully avoids that conflict, whilst solving a growing burden to treat waste and a cost to the Public and Tax Payers that would alleviate the ever-pressing burden of increasing taxes, as well as providing a Renewable Fuel alternative to oil that could be sold to the public at 20 to 20% lower than the current delivery prices at the fuel pumps.

    Imagine selling gasoline or Diesel fuels for personal uses in the UK at under £1-10 per litre again!

    Because something is Green does not mean that it has to cost more!
    What a vote winner that would be for the next Election!

    So Mr Cameron and Mr Osborne (for the UK) or indeed other Government Leaders around the EU take note, this is what is available now and it can be rolled out quickly from this year.

    Go for it “Your Country Needs you.” to be decisive.

    By :
    Paul
    - Posted on :
    08/02/2013
  • Nice one Paul.

    Knowing that Mr Cameron in the UK and his consortium with Mr Clegg will not even read this article I wonder if they will get the message?

    It is possible to make renewable fuels from waste and produce these at a cost for the publicto use at the pumps for less than €1-00 per litre (even though you state £1-00) but my assumption is based upon the different taxation rates across here in the EU.

    Using Green Projects as the motor of growth across the EU (or indeed as Mr Cameron would appear to have indicated) is real but it must be targted to proper prgrammes. the public -TAX PAYERS - are fed up with bailing out Green Projects such as wind and the current photovoltaic systems because there are no positive advantages to anyone except the installers nd the electricity companies who get HUGE HUGE subsidies to build thjem and HUGE HUGE tarriff rates to sell the electricity to the public. Governments are giving away Tax Payers money here: Government do not have money they are the Custodians of the Public Purse, and they should behave as though.
    These Renewable Fuels plants we have talked about over the last few years have been totally ignored by the current British Government as well as I assune the past one. But then they are not alone, the other EU Governments have also totally ignored this issue. What is more surprising is the big Conglommerates seem also to have ignored this: I wonddr why?

    By :
    Carol
    - Posted on :
    08/02/2013
  • I have noted before that whenever someone is reported at a Senior Government level about stimulating Green Issues for Growth that this is all very much pandering.

    I am aware of development that is both green and cost effective and it is ready and waiting to go - or be started - in the UK and this is the development for making cheap renewablefuels for transport from waste and it has the most-favoured potential of all to reduce costs for road transport fuels to less than £1 per litre. I wonder if this is the same one that you are talking about.

    Tell the World, the Uk, ther public that this is around in the UK here and now. This is in Yorkshire and what a place to do this! It would be a boon for employment as well as provide a solution for waste.

    We all need this.

    By :
    Erick
    - Posted on :
    11/02/2013
Background: 

Europe aims to reduce its primary energy use by 20% by 2020, a target which is not legally binding. The Energy Efficiency Directive was proposed by the European Commission in mid-2011 as part of its effort to reach this objective. To do this, the EU will need to more than double its energy savings efforts, according to the Commission's estimates.

In its draft directive, the Commission proposed individual measures for each of the sectors that could play a role in reducing energy consumption, including an obligation on energy companies to reduce their deliveries to customers by 1.5% each year, that has proved complex and in many quarters controversial.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Efficiency Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising