EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU faces tough decisions on climate change and renewables

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 07 March 2007, updated 28 May 2012

As European leaders gather in Brussels for the Spring Summit, a row on renewable energy threatens to taint EU attempts to show that it leads the world in the fight against climate change.

  • Renewables: 

EU members are still deeply divided over a plan to set a mandatory target for increasing the use of renewable energy. 

In January, the Commission made an ambitious proposal to raise the share of renewables in the bloc's overall energy consumption to 20% by 2020. It had intended to make this target legally binding on member states, claiming that such a move could save up to €100 billion and 780 million tonnes of CO2 per year. 

But EU foreign ministers, meeting on 5 March, failed to agree on the mandatory character of the target. Energy ministers had met with a similar failure last month. 

The main opposition comes from France and Finland, which both satisfy a large portion of their electricity needs through low-carbon nuclear energy and say that this should be taken into account. They are backed by a number of the new member states, including Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Bulgaria – where coal remains a vital source of power and governments wish to resist binding targets that would force them to invest heavily in expensive renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power.

Other countries are also warning against imposing unreachable goals on governments. 

  • Climate change: 

Despite a certain scepticism from some countries, including Poland, Hungary and Finland, about Europe unilaterally cutting its emissions of greenhouse gases, member states have reached a global consensus on the goal of a 20% reduction by 2020. 

They have also agreed that this target should be elevated to 30% should an international deal be reached to reduce emissions from all developed nations, including the United States. 

However, the more prickly question of how the burden of these cuts will be shared out among member states will not be addressed at the meeting. A German official predicted that discussion on this issue could take some time: "We will be thinking about two years rather than two months," he said. 

Positions: 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel  and Commission President José Manuel Barroso both want the summit to prove that Europe is willing to provide a global lead in tackling climate change. 

"This week the eyes of the world will be on the EU and what we can do on issues like climate change and energy. From Washington to Moscow and Beijing, people will be watching to see if we really are credible when we talk about these things," said Barroso. 

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said that ministers had narrowed differences on other points but "the central point of difference is on the binding nature of the target for renewables". 

"This target should be binding, for the success and credibility of our policy," said Barroso

France, whose position is seen as pivotal on the issue, has signalled that it could back a mandatory target if it is one that takes fuller account of the contribution nuclear power takes in tackling global warming. It proposes a "non-carbon and low-carbon" energy target rather than a renewables one, which would also include nuclear and a new generation of cleaner coal-fired stations. 

However, Spanish European Affairs Minister Alberto Navarro said he thought "these are two different issues". 

Europe's major business lobby BusinessEurope has expressed its concern about the plans for a binding 20% target for renewables, describing the goal as unrealistic and that it had never been demonstrated how it could be achieved. It calls instead for leaders to recognise the "very strong contribution" that nuclear power has to make as a non-CO2-producing form of power and proposes that the EU takes steps to increase nuclear energy's share in electricity generation from 32% to 40% by 2030. 

It also said that the target of cutting greenhouse gases by 20% by 2020 could raise the bar too high for other countries to follow Europe’s lead. It added that the plan was "a step into the unknown" because no one had ever assessed the impact on European business. 

EU leaders "absolutely must make fighting climate change the guiding imperative and should not compromise on that goal in their scramble for energy security", said Jan Kowalzig, climate campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe

He believes that the EU should aim higher on cutting emissions, saying: "It would be a dangerous discrepancy to only commit to reducing emissions by 20% by 2020, when scientific and political analysis all point to 30% as the critical reduction needed to avoid catastrophic climate change. A target of less that 30% will indicate to the international community that Europe is shirking its responsibility on climate change." 

The NGO is also in favour of a binding target on renewable energy but calls also for more specific targets across different sectors like electricity generation, heating and cooling. "Just an overall target for the share of renewable energy in the total energy mix is too vague to give clear guidance. We also need binding and separate sub-targets for of 35% for electricity production and 25% for the heating and cooling sector," said Kowalzig. 

Background: 

Leaders from the EU's 27 member states will be looking to make history as they gather on 8-9 March 2007 for the EU's Spring Summit, by agreeing to ambitious plans to cut emissions of greenhouse gases. 

However, while the strategy has already gathered a large consensus at ministerial level, a row on renewable energy still needs to be resolved and could damage the EU's credibility as a world leader on global warming. 

Commission President José Manuel Barroso established, on 5 March 2007, an advisory group of world-renowned experts on energy and climate-change issues, including Sir Nicholas Stern, author of the October 2006 report on the economics of climate change, and France's TV star and environmental expert Nicolas Hulot, in order to help Europe's leaders find solutions. 

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising