Nabucco, which had been a decade in the planning, was competing with TAP, a project of Statoil, AXPO and E.ON Ruhrgas (see background).
"The Nabucco project is over for us," Gerhard Roiss, chief executive of the Austrian energy company OMV, told a hastily called news conference, putting to rest the suggestion that Nabucco would also be built.
The consortium that chose TAP project over Nabucco West to transport Azeri gas to Europe pointed to higher gas prices in Italy and Greece as the reason, OMV said.
Roiss questioned whether higher gas prices could really be achieved in austerity-plagued Greece or plentifully supplied Italy, which lie on the TAP route.
‘A fig leaf’
"The question of whether that is a fig leaf for a political decision I leave to you to judge," he said.
Last week it became known that Azeri state energy SOCAR will buy a majority stake in Greece’s natural gas grid operator DESFA. The news was interpreted by experts as favouring the choice of TAP.
Also, press reports have suggested that Azerbaijan doesn’t want trouble with its Russian neighbour. It is widely known that Russia has an aversion for the Nabucco project and has designed its own pipeline project, South Stream, as a means to kill the EU-favoured project.
At the special EU energy summit on 14-15 March, Bulgarian President Rossen Plevneliev said that Nabucco was a priority not only for his country, but for 16 EU members.
The choice of TAP leaves Bulgaria as the biggest loser and Greece as the biggest winner, according to press reports. Bulgaria is almost at 100% dependent on Russian gas imports. Plans to build South Stream, which would also run through Bulgaria, may now be shelved, as the project is seen as largely political and overly expensive.
Italy, which will be the major recipient of Azeri gas from TAP, had the option of building LNG terminals in the event that the Shah Deniz consortium chose Nabucco.