EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU: Green energy needs milestones to grow

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 07 June 2012, updated 08 June 2012

Europe must agree 2030 milestones as soon as possible to spur investment in renewable energy, or green power growth will fizzle once firm policy runs out in 2020, the European Commission said on Wednesday (6 June) in its latest strategy statement.

Many in the renewable energy sector agree there is a need for strong guidance, but want binding targets, rather than vague aims. At the other extreme, some of the 27 member states are strongly opposed to legal goals for renewables.

The EU currently has a firm target to increase the share of renewable energy in the mix to 20% on 1990 levels by 2020, which analysts and industry say it should meet and could exceed.

Other goals include a 20% cut on Europe’s 1990 carbon emissions level, and a non-binding 20% improvement on the continent’s 2005 energy efficiency standard.

But the renewables communication only lays out scenarios for moving on from the 20% renewables binding goal.

“We should continue to develop renewable energy and promote innovative solutions. We have to do it in a cost-efficient way,” Energy Commissioner Guenther Oettinger said in a statement.

“This means producing wind and solar power where it makes economic sense and trading it within Europe, as we do for other products and services.”

The Commission says that better coordination is needed across member states, so that renewables, such as solar and wind, can be generated wherever they are cheapest.

It also says ‘support schemes’ should be consistent across the bloc and reiterates its backing for an integrated market with connections to northern Africa, where it sees the potential for large-scale solar generation to supply Europe.

Beyond 2020

Looking beyond 2020, Oettinger has said he wants agreement on a new policy regime before the end of the current Commission, whose mandate expires in 2014.

“Without a suitable framework (after 2020) renewable energy growth will slump,” the Commission said in a statement.

Options include new goals for emissions cuts, but no goals for renewable energy, which would leave the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) as the main instrument to cut carbon emissions and encourage renewable energy.

Britain, for instance, wants an emphasis on the carbon goal and argues that a renewable goal might disadvantage other low carbon energy generation, such as nuclear or even gas.

Many in the renewable industry say the collapse of the ETS to less than €7, far below the €20-€50 analysts believe necessary to spur investment, demonstrates the value of targets.

A second option outlined in the Commission document would be to replace the three 2020 targets with three 2030 targets. This could take the form of national or EU-wide targets.

Binding targets

The European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), the umbrella group for Europe’s renewable energy industry, has proposed a binding target to ensure renewables make up 45% of the energy mix by 2030.

“This is not something that's really impossible,” said Arthouros Zervos, EREC president and chief executive of Greece's biggest electricity producer, PPC.

EREC also wants the EU’s CO2 cuts target for 2020 raised from 20% to 30%.

Zervos called for a stable policy on subsidies for renewables, arguing that fossil fuel subsidies were much higher than those for green energy, and “negative, disruptive changes” and retroactive changes were a particular problem.

EWEA says that strong growth in renewables to 2030 could generate more than 3 million jobs.

Positions: 

"European Ministers must turn this message into action and back a renewable energy target for 2030, as supported by the Strategy's Impact Assessment", said Stephane Bourgeois, Head of Regulatory Affairs of the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) in Brussels. "A legally binding renewable energy target for 2030 is crucial if we want to foster Europe's leadership in wind energy, and in particular offshore wind".

Eurelectric, the association representing Europe’s electricity industry, reacted to the communication with a call for renewables to be put on an equal footing with other technologies, consistent policies to be applied under the EU ETS, a strengthening of the scope of renewables development and a clear distinction to be made between pre and post-2020 planning.

“The growth of renewables is a welcome development,” said Eurelectric’s secretary-general Hans ten Berge, “it contributes to diversification, security of supply, and the shift towards a greener, low-carbon economy. With technologies like onshore wind and solar PV reaching maturity, Europe must integrate renewable energy into the market. In a difficult economic environment, European citizens and businesses deserve cost-efficient solutions. To this end, we must build on the experiences from the pre-2020 period when designing the post-2020 framework: this means a more European approach, more market, more consistency and a level playing field for mature RES and other generation technologies.”

But the Coalition of progressive European energy companies – which represents SSE, Eneco, DONG Energy, EWE, Acciona, Sorgenia, PPC, EDP Renewables and Stadtwerke – renewed their call for a binding EU 2030 renewables target, which they said “is needed to bridge the policy gap between 2020 and 2050 and to allow the renewables industry to mature and to reach cost competitiveness. In the absence of a binding 2030 target, renewable growth is put at great risk, which will undermine the decarbonisation scenarios of the EU Energy Roadmap 2050, as well as the overarching EU 2050 carbon reduction target of 80-95%.” 

To give investors a better long-term perspective, the Renewable Directive’s Energy Roadmap for the post-2020 period should be brought forward from 2018 to 2014, they said. “It should be recognised that the binding 2020 renewables target has worked – in the absence of a robust carbon price – to create new European industries, growth and jobs, whilst diversifying energy supply and reducing European energy import dependency. Now the time has come to focus on the 2030 policy framework, of which a binding renewables target must be the cornerstone.”

Marc Oliver Herman, Oxfam’s EU biofuels expert, welcomed the “ambitious” EU renewable energy policy announced but found it “shocking that the Commission’s blueprint ignores that the current EU biofuels policy is driving up global food prices and helping push people in poor countries off their land.”

“When they meet next week,” he continued, “EU Ministers have the chance to tell the Commission that a renewable future for Europe must not come at the expense of millions of families in developing countries struggling to feed their children. Ministers must urge Energy Commissioner Oettinger to reform the flawed 2020 biofuels policy before moving on to 2030. This means scrapping the binding 10% 2020 target for renewable energy in transport, as this will be largely met through biofuels produced from food crops.”

The position found an echo with the World Wildlife Fund. "A renewable energy target for 2030 is an essential element in the post-2020 strategy,” said Imke Lübbeke, Senior Renewable Energy Policy Officer at WWF European Policy Office. “It will keep Europe at the forefront of innovation, and will aid economic recovery by boosting jobs. An increasing role for renewable energy will also help to cut the hundreds of billions of euros (€315bn) Europe pays every year for imported coal, oil and gas."

On the same theme, Daniel Fraile, the Climate Action Network's Europe Senior Energy Policy Officer said that "a stable policy framework, if well designed, will help realize investments and support continuous growth of the European renewables industry, which will in turn create jobs.” Before making renewables compete in a market specifically designed for inflexible conventional generation, fossil fuel subsidies had to be removed and energy markets reformed, he expounded. "It is important to understand that conventional energy sources have enjoyed huge financial support for decades, which distorts the market and does not allow renewables to compete on a level playing field," he said.

The bioenergy company, Novozymes, issued a statement welcoming the plan to propose legislation on the post-2020 regime in 2014. “Renewed ambitious mandatory targets for renewable energy should be part of the new framework,” it said. “Combining targets for GHG emissions reduction with targets for renewables and energy efficiency hold true post-2020. They will guarantee we achieve long term GHG emissions reduction and energy security objectives in a cost effective manner, using most sustainable renewable energy technologies. This is particularly relevant for the transport sector where energy demand is growing and GHG emissions are increasing.

"More trading of renewable electricity within the EU is exactly what we need,” said the Liberal Democrat MEP Graham Watson. “We all need to be importing and exporting our renewables. The sun is always shining and wind always blowing somewhere in Europe, and a single market for renewables will make the green energy switch work"

"But in order to do that we need the capacity for long-distance electricity transmission,” he went on, “and by and large our power lines currently stop at national borders. The next EU budget is due to put €9bn towards cross-border energy links - but that money is being squeezed."

Next steps: 
  • 2014: EU's energy commissioner has called for a new climate policy regime to be agreed before the expiry of the current Commission's mandate in 2014
  • 2020: Deadline for the EU's three 20% targets to be met - a 20% cut in CO2 emissions and increase in the share of renewables in the energy mix - both measured against 1990 levels - and for a 20% improvement in the EU's energy efficiency performance, compared to 2005.
EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • If we agree to “think globally”, it becomes evident that riveting attention on GROWTH could be a grave mistake because we are denying how economic and population growth in the communities in which we live cannot continue as it has until now. Each village's resources are being dissipated, each town's environment degraded and every city's fitness as place for our children to inhabit is being threatened. To proclaim something like, 'the meat of any community plan for the future is, of course, growth' fails to acknowledge that many villages, towns and cities are already ‘built out’, and also ‘filled in’ with people. If the quality of life we enjoy now is to be maintained for the children, then limits on economic and population growth will have to be set. By so doing, we choose to “act locally" and sustainably.
    More economic and population growth are no longer sustainable in many too many places on the surface of Earth because biological constraints and physical limitations are immutably imposed upon ever increasing human consumption, production and population activities of people in many communities where most of us reside. Inasmuch as the Earth is finite with frangible environs, there comes a point at which GROWTH is unsustainable. There is much work to done locally. But that effort cannot reasonably begin without sensibly limiting economic and population growth.
    To quote another source, “We face a wide-open opportunity to break with the old ways of doing the town’s business…..” That is a true statement. But the necessary “break with the old ways” of continuous economic and population growth is not what is occurring. There is a call for a break with the old ways, but the required changes in behavior are not what is being proposed as we plan for the future. What is being proposed and continues to occur is more of the same, old business-as-usual overconsumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities, the very activities that appear to be growing unsustainably. More business-as-usual could soon become patently unsustainable, both locally and globally. A finite planet with the size, composition and environs of the Earth and a community with the boundaries, limited resources and wondrous climate of villages, towns and cities where we live may not be able to sustain much longer the economic and population growth that is occurring on our watch. Perhaps necessary changes away from UNSUSTAINABLE GROWTH and toward sustainable lifestyles and right-sized corporate enterprises are in the offing.
    Think globally while there is still time and act locally before it is too late for human action to make any difference in the clear and presently dangerous course of unfolding human-induced ecological events, both in our planetary home and in our villages, towns and cities.

    By :
    Steven Earl Salmony
    - Posted on :
    07/06/2012
  • Binding targets sought by renewables industry will benefit mainly the wind industry and no one else. These binding targets set as a result of intensive lobbying in Brussels, are leading to a trampling of democracy all over Europe as local ommunities watch their precious landscape being ruined by speculators cloaked in binding targets. Faced with growing opposition to on land wind farms, attention is now switching to our seas where wind developers , citing binding targets as justification ,are seeking to take over large stretches of vulnerable coastal waters for their destructive, expensive and unreliable machines. It is clear that the wind experiment is failing on all fronts...security of supply?, cost ? environmental protection ? Our leaders should just grasp the nettle and stop this destructive bondoogle NOW...

    By :
    James D
    - Posted on :
    08/06/2012
  • Alabama bans UN Agenda 21 / 'Sustainable Development':

    http://thegwpf.org/international-news/5922-alabama-adopts-first-official-state-ban-on-un-agenda-21.html
    http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/1/post/2012/06/winning-the-fight.html
    http://www.offthegridnews.com/2012/06/07/alabama-takes-lead-by-banning-united-nations-agenda-21/
    http://townhall.com/columnists/townhallcomstaff/2012/05/31/alabama_fights_a_un_landgrab/page/full/

    See what people think of UN Agenda 21 here - the comments are quite interesting indeed!

    http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/06/07/peter-foster-no-bravo-for-rio20/

    By :
    J
    - Posted on :
    10/06/2012
Background: 

The EU has set itself a legally binding goal for 2020 of reducing its CO2 emissions by 20% and increasing the share of renewables in the energy mix by the same amount, both measured against 1990 levels.

A target of a 20% increase in energy efficiency against 2005 standards has also been set but it is not legally enforceable. The low carbon roadmap in March 2011 stated that if it were met  emissions cuts would automatically rise to 25%, five percentage points above the target.

In October 2009, EU leaders endorsed a long-term target of reducing collective developed country emissions by 80-95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels. This is in line with the recommendations of the UN's scientific arm - the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - for preventing catastrophic changes to the Earth's climate.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising