EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU renewable energy firms caught in perfect storm

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 16 November 2011

Three of Europe's top renewable energy companies became the latest victims of a global collapse in prices, massive oversupply and governments slashing subsidies as austerity budgets are being adopted across the continent to contain the eurozone debt crisis.

SolarWorld, Q-Cells and Nordex are among the latest renewable energy companies to be hit by a mix of high inventories, slower demand and banks tightening their purses regarding wind parks.

Solar companies in particular suffered as they ramped up production last year to meet a surge in demand from Germany and Italy where customers rushed to buy solar panels before governments cut vital subsidies.

Both economies are reducing so-called feed-in tariffs to make the solar sector more productive, and subsidies and prices have been falling at a faster rate than manufacturing costs, leading Germany's renewable elite to slash their 2011 outlooks.

Pressure on governments has also increased after debt problems in the eurozone escalated, forcing governments to find ways to save costs, including EU-paymaster Germany as well as Italy, which last week pushed through an austerity package demanded by the European Union.

In Spain, the likely new centre-right government plans a major overhaul of the energy sector, possibly axing subsidies for wind and solar power as the euro debt crisis makes funding very costly.

"The sovereign debt crisis in Europe and rising equity requirements imposed on banks have rendered financing of wind farm projects more difficult again," said a statement from German wind turbine maker Nordex, adding it now saw 2011 sales of €920 million, instead of €1 billion.

SolarWorld, Germany's No.2 solar company by sales, also cut its outlook, saying it no longer expected 2011 revenue to reach last year's €1.3 billion.

"In the entire market, the demand in the third quarter of 2011 developed worse than expected," Chief Executive Frank Asbeck said, adding he saw prices for modules falling by another 10% in 2012 after a 40% drop this year, making only single-digit margins possible.

Nuclear exit, catastrophic finances

Q-Cells, once the world's largest maker of solar cells, said finance chief Marion Helmes resigned following a wider-than-expected quarterly operating loss.

"The lights go out at Q-Cells. The CFO is leaving the sinking ship, EBIT is more than just weak and this all doesn't look good for the company. Quite the opposite: the balance sheet could be described as catastrophic," a trader said.

Along with peers such as First Solar, Suntech and Yingli, Q-Cells has been hit by falling prices while Germany's decision to pull out of nuclear power did not translate into additional support to the industry.

In fact, analysts and industry experts see a return of conventional power and imports rather than a wide-ranging government-backed expansion of renewable power.

Not all gloom and doom

However, three European renewable energy groups gave a ray of hope amid a dark outlook for green energy in 2012.

SMA Solar, Germany's No.1 solar group by sales, posted higher-than-expected quarterly results, benefiting from strong business in the United States, Belgium and Italy as well as increasing demand for its maintenance services.

Spanish wind turbine maker Gamesa forecast an uptick in 2012 sales thanks to its expansion into new markets and stuck to its 2013 objectives just two days after larger peer Vestas scrapped its long-term goals.

One of the world's largest wind power generators, Spain's Acciona, posted nine-months results above estimates, boosted by higher power prices for its renewable energy.

"There just a little ray of sunlight shining through for the sector, parts of which are in trouble otherwise. For the solar sector there are some clouds on the horizon," a Luxembourg-based senior trader said.

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • Current problems with budgets can be laid firmly at the door of the banksters, mostly, but no wholly, residing in the (sh(city) of London. Calling them two-legged scum, given the current circumstances could be considered a complement.

    Renewables (RES) have various problems in Europe, mostly associated with invertebrate politicos. In Spain, a failure to link RES support to energy tariffs (i.e. build the FiT into all energy bills) has led to a growth of Spanish government debt (ditto in the Netherlands). The reason, in both cases, was to economically insulate consumers from enhanced energy costs. Oddly, price is held up by that artistic profession – economists – as one of the best way of regulating demand in a market.. Gas price rises in the UK 2007 to 2009 resulted in a fall in consumption of 12% (source: British Gas). In the absence of such signals BAU tends to be very much the order of the day. Most people (& companies) waste energy with gay abandon.

    PWR research suggests that the rise in energy prices (due to RES) would be mostly off-set by energy efficiency measures. People and companies need to be driven to these – through price signals and legislation. Sadly, the EU legislative process for energy efficiency is dominated by invertebrates.

    Finally, there is a solution to RES funding in Europe. It resides in the (sh)city of London and other similar haunts of social parasites – a tax on financial transactions (e.g. CDSs on Euro-denominated government bonds). Such a tax would raise circa Euro100bn per year – quite enough to fund lots of RES. It is instructive that the UK’s Cam-moron government (anti-RES to a fault) has taken legal action against the EU to prevent such a move (the tax).

    And so coming full circle, austerity budgets that socialise the problems caused by the banksters will impact on Euro RES development, whilst measures to address the problems caused by banksters are opposed by governments (Cam-morons) that are funded (bribed?) by banksers. It’s a funny world.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    17/11/2011
  • An interesting article and an equally interesting side-comment.

    For too long the big Renewable Energy Companies - such as the suppliers and the mega-rich over-bearing electrical utilities such as EDF, Power-Gen, Scottish and Southern Energy and their cohorts in crime the big companies - have milked the Renewable Energy tariff systems to the benefit of Them selves and their SHARE-HOLDERS without any feeling for the purchaser. And what is worse the EU (European Union) Politicians have kow-towed and prostrated their positions to them - regardless of the results.

    For example a €uro Multi hundred million investment in off-shore wind farm development was proposed and developed and a mature discussion ensued over the fact that in the first two years after commissioning the Financial Rewards obtained from the sale of Renewable Electricity would have resulted in a premium income of 3 times the capital cost to build the facility. But it did not stop there; the ongoing payments scheduled for the ensuing 15 years meant that by the end of the period the revenue would have been almost 8 times the capital costs to develop the project. The EU Tax payer is forced to support this project because the needs of Renewable Energy are upper-most in the EU agenda. Then the purchaser - let's not forget him - is informed that his electricity bill includes a premium charge for supporting the development of renewable electricity.

    Further an example of a Solar Cell facility is of equal interest for again its development which was reported here suggests that the Industry is “over-heating” (excuse the pun) because there is a surplus of supply and the quotients to the support as Renewable Energy Tariffs is now more closely watched than before – meaning that severe financial strictures in the EU are being applied to prevent abuse of the system by “Member States.” So the news that the industry in Spain I snow suffering is a by-product of this issue and if the rest of the EU needs any confirmation that there was a need to curtail such “wanton abuse” in paying subsidies out here there is a further example of same. A project costing €200 Million in capital development is proven to be so lucrative to an investor because of incentives (tariff rebates, investment taxation off-sets and grants) that even before it is built the project was sold onwards to a Hedge Fund and Venture Capitalist for €600 Million and that is before it generated one MW of electricity. This is a total sham for the EU and it is not isolated.

    Go further forwards and look again at the Biomass-Power Stations that are springing up across the EU where projects are being put up to burn wood and wood waste to make electricity. These are not being raised for the benefit of the EU and/or the Member States with substitution of Renewable Energy/Electricity for Fossil-Fuel derived alternatives. These are for wanton Greed of the proponents. The Peel Utilities proposal in the Barton Area (of Greater Manchester,) the Ineous development in Ellesmere Port, the Powergen offering at Blackburn Meadows (in Sheffield) and the Drax Plant in Yorkshire and the ALCOA facilities in Sicily the EDF ENEL RWE and the many others around the EU are but the tip of the ice-berg of compliscent companies that are exploiting the Renewable Energy issues for pure financial gain at the expense of Front-Ended Subsidies (to build these facilities) and Renewable Electricity Tariffs (which they will continue to reap over the following 15 years) all paid for by Tax Payers - and the subsequent higher charges to the Customers (Tax Payers by another name) do nothing more than benefit of the Share-Holders of these Companies.

    There is of course a way around this sham of representing these Renewable Energy Tariff payments and that is to limit them by exercising a full scrutiny of the business cases for them being applied to the Renewable Technologies.

    Such a procedure should look at the whole issue of the Needs of any Subsidy/Grant for said projects and programmes and define realistic business case issues for ROI and IRR (Returns on Investment and Internal Rates of Return.) This should limit any front-ended Subsidy/Grant to the minimum and introduce a means whereby it can be clawed back from the Company that has built the facility or the subsequent owner under Statutory Law. Similarly there needs to be a similar application of the Renewable Energy Tariffs to be time-limited so that these Huge Financial Gains limit the Commercial Benefits of Companies (building and operating these Facilities) to more modest returns at within the 25% region rather than the 150% and more currently being observed in these Solar Cell/Photo-Voltaic/Wind Turbine/Biomass-burning Power Stations/Incineration (so-called waste to energy plants.) By doing these simple things this would bring some of the excesses we have seen over the past few years under control and assist the EU in controlling the economies of some countries that are currently over-exposed to borrowing. These are the easiest of issues to manage and yet the EU does not address them and they are not addressed elsewhere in the World.

    Yet despite all this rhetoric about the needs to control the issues about Renewable Energy plant and the production of Renewable Energy there is also a fundamental issue that is still not being addressed. The production plants – the Wind Turbines, the Solar Cells and the current production runs of Thin Film Photo-Voltaic Cells are still over-priced for what they are and in some instances are encouraged to be too expensive because of the subsidies given to the manufacturers of them. This position needs addressing by the Renewable Energy industry and it is to be hoped that it is. We from our perspective have been watching these developments with great interest and have recorded the fact that there are major developments in Photo-Voltaic Cellular Energy production which within the next two to five years will reduce the price of plant – in this particular area – by over 80%!

    And that process is in the use of spray application of Ultra-Thin Paint-Film Photo-Voltaic Cellular materials. Such a system is here and it is ready to take off and has been shown recently to be available now for on line production.

    This development which was also referred to in the EurActiv Press within the last two years heralds the opportunity not seen before of spray-application of Photo-Voltaic cellular technology to any surface with ease. So in that this opportunity opens up many possibilities for the use hitherto as yet not considered as suited to such. Thus any existing structure – be it a canopy or roof or wall to say a factory, an office block, an airport, a bridge, a dam, a waste water treatment works or chemical plant, a spray covering to a car park roof etc and the list goes onwards – would become a useful source of manufacturing Renewable Energy at a fraction of the cost of current Solar Cell and existing Thin-Film Photo-Voltaic Cellular technology.

    So imagine the scenario when a building or structure comes up for maintenance and there is a need to provide a protective finish to say a concrete or brick wall, just spraying this with such a finish and connecting it up to an energy collection mechanism would be completely feasible and within five years from now the norm!

    So the Industry must stop bellyaching over the current scenario and move onwards to the new horizons.

    By :
    Paul Hu
    - Posted on :
    18/11/2011
  • Blázni.

    http://cei.org/news-releases/climategate-2-scandal-continues

    By :
    BERAN
    - Posted on :
    23/11/2011
Background: 

EU leaders have signed up to a mandatory target to satisfy 20% of Europe's energy demand from renewable sources by 2020.

The EU-wide 20% target was later translated into individual targets for each member state, laid down in a new Renewables Directive, adopted in April 2009. Support schemes remain a national prerogative under the revised directive.

The Commission's latest progress report, published in January 2011, calls for investment in renewable energy to be doubled from €35 billion to €70 billion to meet the EU's 2020 target (EurActiv 31/01/11).

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising