EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU to revive debate on minimum energy tax levels

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 15 January 2013

EU officials are to debate a new set of tax proposals to promote clean fuel and erode fiscal advantages that have made diesel relatively cheap, a document seen by Reuters showed.

The Commission has long been seeking to change energy taxation, but some member states have repeatedly thwarted progress and are likely to continue to do so.

Taxation law in the European Union requires the unanimity of all 27 member states, which is almost impossible to achieve.

Luxembourg, for instance, has been generating revenue through particularly low taxes on diesel, meaning vehicles, notably lorries carrying freight, stop in the centrally located nation to refuel.

Ahead of a working party meeting on 23 January that will bring together representatives of member states, an internal European presidency note dated 9 January on minimum rates for energy products revives the idea of taxing fuels according to carbon dioxide emissions and energy content.

For now, fuel is taxed based on volume.

While trying to lower carbon emissions, the European Commission has said it is "fuel neutral" when it comes to setting minimum taxation levels.

Because a litre of diesel contains more energy and more carbon than a litre of gasoline, the changes under discussion, if agreed, could mean minimum tax rates per liter of diesel would eventually be higher than for gasoline.

Currently diesel is cheaper than petrol in nearly all EU states, with Britain a notable exception.

While offering some exemptions, the new proposals would over time provide incentives for sustainable biofuels, as well as natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).

Diesel worries

Diesel use is a major concern for the Commission because the EU's refineries cannot produce enough of it and the bloc often has to import diesel, while exporting surplus gasoline, sometimes at a loss.

Diesel fumes have also been named as a cancer risk by the World Health Organization.

Last week, Environment Commissioner Janez Potočnik said it was crucial to reduce diesel emissions as part of efforts to improve air quality.

He is pressing to improve the accuracy of vehicle testing because, especially for diesel vehicles, there are major discrepancies between emissions recorded in the laboratory and "real-world" emissions generated in day-to-day use.

Algirdas Šemeta, the European commissioner in charge of taxation policy, has sought to fend off potential opposition to any tax changes from diesel-engine giants, such as Volkswagen, saying a slow phase-in would give plenty of time to adapt engine requirements.

Environmental groups agree diesel needs to be taxed more.

A group of non-governmental organisations in December wrote to EU finance ministers in a letter seen by Reuters calling on them "to support a significant increase in the minimum levels of taxation of diesel fuel for transport purposes".

Luxembourg's diesel rates are good for generating revenue for it, but so-called "tank tourism" was negative for the nation's neighbours, said the letter, signed by more than 30 campaign groups.

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • Another example of areas where the EU is interferering unnecessarily in national matters?
    Whilst the tax on road and domestic heating fuels may well need to be harmonised in the Benelux countries and those further afield with contiguous land boundaries - possibly, even the selling price too if real "equality" is to be achieved - it is largely irrelevant to a citizen in island states such as Malta and Cyprus, Britain and Ireland what the cost of, and duty on such fuel is.
    In short, I see no reason for the Commission to interfere. If there is a trade-distorting problem with different tax rates between neighbouring countries, resulting in businesses and consumers buying across borders, let the individual countries sort it; for other countries where such cross-border purchases are impossible (or very difficult and likely to be uneconomic), it is for them to decide how to tax their national citizens and anyone who vosits their country.

    By :
    Neville
    - Posted on :
    15/01/2013
  • The EC's ambitions are quite reasonable in this area - anomalies with respect to trade are the exact reason why the EC was founded (to stop amongst other things tax tourism wrt goods). Couple this to the need to address emissions then the case for taxing liquid fuels on the basis of energy content per litre is unarguable.

    By the way, diesel has an energy density greater than that of the explosive Semtex - hence the use of diesel in America's air-burst bombs.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    15/01/2013
  • It is not a matter of distortion of tax rates among MS, but a environmental re-adjustment to increase taxes on more polluting and harmful fuel source (e.g. diesel), and encourage shift to cleaner fuel sources. This measure should be region-wide and therefore it is a highly relevant issue for Europe!

    By :
    Nicolas
    - Posted on :
    15/01/2013
  • "Diesel use is a major concern for the Commission because the EU's refineries cannot produce enough of it and the bloc often has to import diesel, while exporting surplus gasoline, sometimes at a loss."

    Are you kidding me??? That's a major concern for the mineraloil industry, not the Commission!!!
    wondering who's behind this proposal anyway.....

    By :
    anonymous
    - Posted on :
    18/01/2013
Background: 

Passenger cars alone are responsible for around 12% of total EU emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main greenhouse gas.

In 2007, the EU proposed legislation setting emission performance standards for new cars, which was adopted in 2009 by the European Parliament and the EU Council of Ministers. Today's EU targets ensure that average emissions from new passenger cars do not exceed 130 grams of CO2 per km (g/km) by 2015.

A White Paper on Transport, presented by the Commission in February 2011, flagged measures to raise the €1.8 trillion which the EU says is needed for infrastructure investment in the next 20 years.

Proposals published earlier this year have set a further targets of 95 grams for new passenger cars by 2020, and 147 g/km for vans. By the end of 2014, new targets could be announced for 2025 and 2030.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising