EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Europe’s energy goals ‘endangered’ by permit delays

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 01 March 2012, updated 02 March 2012

The EU’s 2020 energy targets will be imperilled if a three-year guillotine for transmission line permit appeals is watered down, the head of Europe’s electricity network operators warned yesterday (29 February) at the launch of a 10-Year network development plan.

In a far-reaching projection, the European Network Transmission Systems Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) says that €104 billion will be needed to finance some 51,500km of high voltage power lines in the next eight years.

The lion’s share of this investment will take place in Britain (€19 billion) and Germany (€30 billion).

But the ENTSO-E report also found that one in three planned investments is currently being held up by delays in the permitting process, which have been known to drag on for decades. 

The EU executive tried to address this in its €9.1-billion energy infrastructure package last October, by imposing a three-year deadline on future planning appeals and appointing ‘grids tsars’ to police it, but the move is facing opposition.

“Any longer time period or leaving it entirely to ‘subsidiarity’, we fear could really endanger many of these needed projects and could thus really endanger the overall energy policy goals for Europe,” Konstantin Staschus, the ENTSO-E secretary-general said, in response to a question from EurActiv.

Energy blueprint

The ENTSO-E blueprint envisages renewable energy triggering 80% of infrastructure needs until 2020, such as interconnections linking the North Sea offshore grid to the mainland.

But only 9,000 kilometers of transmission lines will be underwater, compared to 28,150 kilometers of overhead lines, which notoriously irk local residents for reasons of sightlines, property prices and health risks.

Some EU states are also objecting on grounds of ‘subsidiarity’, or decentralising power to the smallest local unit, even though grid length is only developing at a rate of 1.3% a year, despite an imminent shift towards electricity generation from renewables.

During a ministerial roundtable on the infrastructure package on 14 February, the Czech energy minister dismissed the fast-tracking of transmission infrastructure projects as a “transfer of powers from national bodies [that] we cannot support.”

Speaking to EurActiv, António Correia de Campos, the European Parliament’s rapporteur on the infrastructure package, said: “We need to relax a bit and look into the viability of performing these tasks to such an early and stringent schedule”.

Legal challenges

However, Staschus stressed that the proposed cut-off would still allow scope for legal challenges. 

“This is a general enough goal that it leaves sufficient subsidiarity for different member states to design their permitting processes in very different federal or centralistic ways,” he said.

“But it still has to be fast if the systems ability to implement massive amounts of renewable resources is going to keep pace with the speed of investments.”

The ENTSO-E plan identifies 100 ‘bottlenecks’, 80% of which are related to the direct or indirect integration of renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power, and lists more than 100 ‘projects of common interest’.

“The commissioning of projects of pan-European significance could result in CO2 savings of 170 MtCO2 (Million tones of CO2 equivalent), of which  150 MtCO2 results from the connection of renewable generation technology and 20 MtCO2 which stem from savings due to further market integration,” the report says.

ENTSO-E has been tasked by the EU with producing a new non-binding 10-year plan every two years.

Next steps: 
  • 22 March: Deadline for tabling amendments to the draft report
  • 28 March: ENTSOE hold stakeholder workshop
  • 26 April: Deadline for stakeholders to submit comments to public consultation on the 10 Year Plan.
  • 31 May: Vote on the draft report by the European Parliament’s ITRE Committe
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • There is a great deal of muddled thinking here (& I do not mean by ENTSO-E). Also I do not know what the 51k of transmission lines represents – certainly not new lines – probably a mix of re-conductoring and some new.

    The problems with resistance by a given population against new lines are mostly social in nature. Taking the example of the UK which is a microcosm of the problems the EU faces. New transmission systems are needed for several reasons. First to shift Scottish generated wind down to the UK (but this will be by a sub-sea cable – so what is the problem?) and second to connect a very large wind farm in central Wales to the English transmission network.

    This week, the Guardian newspaper provided data showing that extremely wealthy aristocratic landowners in the UK were making a fortune out of rents for wind farms. The benefits to the people of Scotland (or anywhere else) are unclear. People in central Wales will see zero benefit either from the wind farm or pylons since the energy is aimed at England (not Wales). Is growing resistance such a surprise?

    Then there is the issue of hypocrisy. Mrs Windsor’s son Charlie (known to his friends as FA Cup), opposes windfarms – but is going to build one any way – after all they take money from the plebs and put it in his already bulging pockets.

    A way around the current impasse would be for governments to support more community energy schemes. For example, a wind turbine for every village or several for each town. Intermittency could be partly addressed with anaerobic digestion and perhaps some electrical storage. This would take some pressure off the transmission network. People would then feel that they participated in the energy system. This has happened to some extent in Germany (& yes there is still opposition to new north – south lines).

    In the case of the UK, the current Tory-vermin government (moderators: Aneurin Bevan – who developed the NHS called the Tories – “vermin” – if it is good enough for him it’s good enough for me) has little interest in “ordinary people”, after all why would Camoron, married to one of the Queen’s relatives and with inherited wealth give a damn. His interest is to make sure his aristocratic chums benefit to the max from wind farms.

    Effective energy policy comes down to sharing the benefits. On the one hand you have a bunch of energy companies that want to preserve a centralised power system (thus ensuing their own continued existence & lifestyles) on the other you have a bunch of politicos and a bureaucracy apparently owned/controlled by the self same energy companies. In the case of the Euro regulators, these are a mix of toothless, gutless or simply an extension of the large power companies.

    To finish. UK readers (of a Tory-vermin persuasion) will be pleased to know that UK energy policy is now made in the Elysee Palace. You see DECC is controlled for the most part by the EDF (who provides DECC with many many advisers) and we all know who owns and controls the EDF. Those that do not believe this - are invited to take a look at the recent nuclear announcments.

    By :
    Che
    - Posted on :
    03/03/2012
Background: 

In December 2009, EU heads of state and government agreed a fiscal stimulus package representing around 1.5% of EU GDP, or €200 billion. The package was adopted on the basis of a European Commission proposal presented the month before, and which appears to have contained the genesis of the monies announced yesterday's infrastructure plan.

To complement the recovery plan, the Commission proposed reallocating unspent EU funds away from agriculture to support energy and broadband Internet infrastructure projects.

Under the proposal, sums would be shifted from 'heading two' of the EU budget (preservation and management of natural resources, including direct payments to support the farming sector) to 'heading 1A' (competitiveness, growth and employment).

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising