EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

French energy merger fuels protectionist claims

Published 27 February 2006 - Updated 29 June 2007
Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

Italian politicians have lashed out at France's "economic patriotism" after PM Dominique de Villepin swiftly wrapped-up a defensive merger between Suez and Gaz de France over the weekend to block an expected bid by Enel.

Citing the "strategic importance of energy" for France, Villepin announced on Saturday (25 February), that a merger between Suez and Gaz de France was "the most appropriate way" to counter Enel's expected bid on Suez.

Villepin said the merger has the ambition to create one of the world's largest energy groups, particularly in the gas sector where it will lead the market for Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). 

The merger will also require the partial privatisation of GDF since the state will need to relinquish part of the 80.2% stake it currently holds in the company. According to a 2004 law, the French government is required to hold at least 70% of GDF's capital. Economic minister Thierry Breton pledged on Saturday that the state's participation in the company will not fall below the 34% stake needed to hold a minority blockade.

"We want real control over the group's strategic decisions," said an aide to Villepin cited in French daily Libération.

The merger has irritated the Italians with industry minister Claudio Scajola cancelling a planned visit to Paris. Economy minister Giulio Tremonti is cited in Libération for lashing out at Villepin's trademark "economic patriotism" doctrine, saying "it is still time to prevent European Union states from raising national barriers" to the EU's economic integration. "In the opposite case," he added with a sense for drama, "we risk a 1914 effect […] with, in the end, a war that nobody had called for".

Advertising