EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

MEPs caught up in hydrogen hype?

Published 14 September 2005 - Updated 29 June 2007
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

Several MEPs called on 12 September for a fundamental shift away from the oil era into the green hydrogen economy. But is their initiative based on science or inspired by political hype?

MEPs from nearly all political groups in the European Parliament have presented a Green Hydrogen Charter urging the EU to mobilise all forces to shift to "a fully integrated green hydrogen economy by 2025". Inspired by American visionary and author Jeremy Rifkin ("The hydrogen economy") and pointing to high oil prices and global warming, the MEPs demanded the floating of a Europe-wide hydrogen bond to raise the necessary billions of euros to build a green hydrogen economy infrastructure.

Chronology of EU initiatives

The MEP initiative on hydrogen is not the first one at EU level. In 2002, the Prodi Commission made the hydrogen economy one of its main priorities (Rifkin was personal adviser to President Prodi). Based on a report of a high-level group  of industry experts, the Commission launched in January 2004 a "Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology Platform" (HFP). In March 2005, this Platform presented its research agenda and deployment strategy (see EurActiv 17 March 2005).

International

In the US, the Bush administration has earmarked 1.8 billion dollars over five years for a Hydrogen Fuel Initiative and a complementary FreedomCAR project. The EU, the US and other partners are working together in an "International partnership for the hydrogen economy".

Challenges

The biggest problem with hydrogen is that it is not a new energy source, but an energy carrier. Hydrogen is not produced from wells but needs to be produced using other energy sources (e.g. through electrolysis or steam reforming of methane). Therefore, the hydrogen economy will only be as clean as the original energy source it is made from (coal, nuclear, natural gas, or renewables). Contrary to the Commission's proposals, the MEPs have clearly made a choice for a hydrogen economy based on renewables.

Another challenge is economic. Production of hydrogen is still very expensive. According to the US Department of Energy, the cost of producing hydrogen would have to be reduced by a factor of four to make hydrogen economically competitive with today's fossil fuels. Of course, rising oil prices could change this state of affairs.

A hydrogen economy will also need a complete new energy infrastructure which is expected to cost hundreds of billions of euros. 

Positions: 

In the MEP conference Jeremy Rifkin once more expressed his astounding optimism about the European Union. Running against the current of EU pessimism, the American thinker believes the 'European dream' will replace the 'American dream' and Europe "will lead the way to a new energy era". On the question of whether oil production is not peaking earlier than expected (see peak oil theories) and what that would mean for the hydrogen economy, Rifkin only had "let's then hope and pray" as a piece of advice. 

All MEPs present during the conference underlined the need for a fundamental shift in EU energy policy in view of high oil prices, climate change and security of energy supply. Jo Leinen (PES, Germany) urged the Council to organise a special summit on future EU energy policy. 

Not all energy experts are convinced about the future of the hydrogen economy. In a paper entitled 'Does the hydrogen economy make sense', Ulf Bossel of the European Fuel Cell Forum challenges the hydrogen promoters by saying that their claims do not respect the energy conservation principle, one of the fundamental laws of physics. He sees the future of sustainable energy being built on a renewed "electron economy" infrastructure instead of a hydrogen one. 

Next steps: 

The MEPs' proposal seems good on intentions but has little to offer on detail. Questions on how the eurobond would work remained unanswered. A future road map is expected to bring more implementation details in October/November.

Background: 

The world's economy is built on the use of cheap fossil fuels such as oil, gas or coal. As these resources are finite, there will come a time when the world will run out of them, although experts disagree on when this will happen. Hydrogen, as the most abundant element on earth, is seen by some as the ideal replacement for these fossil fuels. A future economy, based on hydrogen and electricity, would be much cleaner and less dependent on specific regions in the world [such as the Middle East for oil].

But using hydrogen as an energy source to replace the current world demand of energy will need a massive R&D effort and major investment. Moreover, hydrogen has its own problems. As an energy carrier [in the same way that electricity is] it will have to be produced from other energy sources. At present most hydrogen is produced from natural gas. 

For a good introduction, see Physics Today: The Hydrogen Economy.

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Advertising

Théâtre National - Brussels

30 May 2012:
Théâtre National - Brussels

Maastricht

04 June 2012 - 05 June 2012:
Maastricht
06 June 2012 - 07 June 2012:

Lyon

Advertising