EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

No need for further regulation on shale gas: EU study

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 30 January 2012, updated 02 February 2012

There is no need for more environmental legislation in the case of shale gas exploration, at least until it reaches commercial scale, says a new study published by the European Commission.

The activities relating to exploration of shale gas are already subject to EU and national laws and regulations, says the report, carried out for the European Commission by Belgian law firm Philippe & Partners.

Water protection issues, for instance, which have been raised as an issue by shale gas detractors, are already covered by EU legislation under the Water Framework Directive, the Groundwater Directive and the Mining Waste Directive. Meanwhile, the use of chemicals is covered by the REACH regulation, the study says.

“It is a new technology and we do not have a specific legislation on shale gas, because it is so new," said Marlene Holzner, European Commission spokesperson on energy.

"So the study only says that the existing regulations are applicable for shale gas, that the tool is there and has only to be applied,” she told EurActiv, adding that the study was carried out only in four countries – Poland, France, Germany and Sweden. It was released on 27 January.

Not yet at commercial scale

The law firm said shale gas activities were too small at the moment to justify specific legislation. “Neither on the European level nor on the national level have we noticed significant gaps in the current legislative framework, when it comes to regulating the current level of shale gas activities,” the study reads.

This is, however, not a reason for “complacency”, the study says, since the assessment refers only to the current scale of operations in Europe. Shale gas exploitation on a commercial scale would involve bigger maneuvers, it adds.

Europe has less experience in exploring shale gas formations as a new source of natural gas and no commercial scale exploitations have taken place yet, but this “is expected in a few years’ time”, the report says.

Shale gas is an unconventional source of natural gas and studies show different results on how safe the two main methods of extracting it from rock formations.

One is the horizontal drilling in various regions of the rock, which is needed to capture the gas pockets. The other, hydraulic fracturing - or 'fracking' - involves a high-pressure injection of fluids usually mixed with chemicals into shale rock. Both of them require seismic and drilling permits, as well as large amounts of chemicals and water.

Only after conducting consecutive tests for drilling and fracturing does a project reach the stage of planning and acquiring the needed pipeline, followed by the decision to bring the extraction to a commercial scale.

In a few years’ time, investors might find themselves in need of making a decision on the commercial development of their shale gas projects, a situation which is not covered by the EU study published on 27 January.

Enthusiasts vs. critics

Poland, which aims to shrug off its dependency on Russian gas, is planning to begin commercial shale gas production from 2014, Prime Minister Donald Tusk said last year. Most of the projects are currently at the phase of seismic surveys and some projects already have entered the drilling phase, which is expected to intensify after 2014.

The natural gas trapped in shale rock in Poland could provide the country with enough fuel to last for 300 years, the US Department of Energy said last year.

However, not everyone is willing to allow drilling operations on their land, despite the economic potential. At the beginning of January, thousands of Bulgarians protested against exploration for shale gas over fears it could poison underground water, trigger earthquakes and pose serious public health hazards.

Positions: 

Environmental NGO WWF told EurActiv that it is too early for energy officials to conclude that there is no need for further legislation on shale gas. "Mr. Oettinger has jumped the starting gun. It is still too early for energy officials to conclude that existing EU laws do not need adjustment," Mark Johnston, of WWF said.

The report published by the European Commission contradicts an earlier study of a European institution, Johnston added. The environment (ENVI) committee of the European Parliament published a study in July 2011 in which it presented the loopholes in existing regulation on shale gas.

In a letter sent to the European Commissioner for Energy Günther Oettinger, the Greens in the European Parliament asked the Commission to come forward with legislative proposals to address shale gas exploration. Greens/EFA vice-president and industry spokesperson Reinhard Bütikofer said:

"By distorting the findings of the Commission's own research, commissioner Oettinger is negligent. The study clearly highlights the need to consider adjusting EU legislation to take account of concerns with shale gas, particularly with regards to public participation and environmental impact assessments."

Commenting on the Commission's study, MEP Teresa Riera, S&D spokesperson for industry and energy said:
 

"There might not be a need for specific environmental legislation at this point, but there is certainly a case to be made for a cautionary approach to shell gas extraction".

"What is needed at this stage is to ensure a fully transparent procedure for consultations with local communities, based on evaluations of the risks, full disclosure by the companies of the chemical components to be used and a sound mechanism for cross-border consultations where appropriate."

Ana-Maria Tolbaru

COMMENTS

  • Both the 2050 Energy Roadmap as well as this study ignore the major environmental and health risks associated with shale gas.

    Drilling and fracking for shale gas not only endangers our precious water resources, it also threatens our climate. Inexplicably, the Commission fails to acknowledge these threats.

    There is plenty of evidence from the U.S., where fracking has been used on a large scale:

    • Earlier this month, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency revealed that fracking most likely explains widespread groundwater contamination in Pavilion, Wyoming. Overall, more than 1,000 cases of water contamination have been reported near fracking sites in the U.S.;
    • Many of the chemicals used in fracking fluid are toxic and some are carcinogenic. Scientists at the Endocrine Disruption Exchange found that 25 percent of fracking fluids can cause cancer; 37 percent can disrupt the endocrine system; and 40 to 50 percent can affect the nervous, immune and cardiovascular systems;
    • Each shale gas well results in millions of liters of toxic fracking wastewater. Accidents, spills, and inadequate treatment of this wastewater further endangers water resources;
    • Beyond impacts on water, shale gas development increases heavy-duty truck traffic, noise pollution, and air pollution at the expense of local communities, negatively impacting tourism and agriculture;
    • Recent scientific studies, from Cornell University and the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research, demonstrate that methane emissions from shale gas development are likely to accelerate climate change in the coming decades. This is despite shale gas being a relatively clean-burning fossil fuel.

    The EU and its Member States should press the 'pause' and 'stop'button to allow European citizens to learn about the U.S. experiences with this risky technology.

    Geert

    By :
    Geert De Cock
    - Posted on :
    30/01/2012
Background: 

Shale gas is an unconventional fossil fuel that is found within natural fissures and fractures underground. Until recently, no method of safely transporting it to the surface existed.

However, by pumping water, sand and chemicals into rock formations under high pressure via a technique known as hydraulic fracturing - or 'fracking' - energy companies believe they have found a part of the answer to Europe's energy security.

The method remains intensely controversial because of its possible environmental risks, including poisoning groundwater and higher greenhouse gas emissions than traditional gas.

To proponents, shale gas represents a hitherto untapped and welcome alternative energy source to traditional fossil fuels. At the moment, the continent depends on gas imported from Russia, and disputes between that country and Ukraine have disrupted winter supplies in recent years.

In the United States, shale gas already accounts for 16% of natural gas production and some analysts predict that could rise to 50% within 20 years.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising