EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

NGO accuses MEP of using anti-Russian bias to tout shale gas

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 18 April 2012

The environmental group Food & Water Europe has accused the Polish author of a European Parliament report on shale gas extraction of resorting to "Cold War" rhetoric against Russia to support the industry's development.

In a statement released on Monday, Food & Water Europe blasted the draft report by MEP Bogusław Sonik (European People's Party) on the environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction activities.

The group sees Sonik's report as heavily stilted in favour of shale gas extraction, noting that the author failed to correctly quote the European Commission. The parliamentary report was released on 11 April. 

Sonik considers that risks related to shale gas extraction can be contained through preventive measures. He strongly insists that shale gas development in EU countries should depend only on national authorities with the European Commission acting as a monitor.

"Mr Sonik’s report begins under the assumption that shale gas is a 'very important new source of supply', conveniently dropping the key word 'potential' from this direct quote out of the Commission’s 2050 Energy Roadmap," Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Europe, said in a statement.

Anti-Russian bias

Hauter also accuses the report's author of anti-Russian bias.

"Mr Sonik has resorted to the use of Cold War rhetoric, accusing Russia’s Gazprom of spreading fears about shale gas," Hauter said.

"While Poland’s history with Russia has been problematic, Food & Water Europe emphasises that, for an EU of 27 member states with a focus on 2050, such rhetoric only complicates the challenge of developing 21st-century policies to ensure clean and renewable energy solutions.”

Sonik has been widely quoted as saying that Russia's Gazprom has been influencing politicians in EU countries and has links to environmental organisations to keep Europe dependent on its gas sales.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who will take over as president on 7 May, recently said the country's gas industry needs to "rise to the challenge" of shale gas as the United States and some European countries forge ahead with developing the controversial energy source.

Shale gas exploration was recently suspended in Bulgaria and Romania amid protests. The promoters of shale gas in these countries have sometimes accused the protestors of being manipulated by Russia, but the allegations have never been proved.

'Huge battle' to come

Poland is spearheading shale gas development although a recent report indicated that the country's reserves were only one-fifth of what was previously believed. Nonetheless, the government still believes that shale gas could help the country to become more independent in the energy sector.

All political parties in Warsaw are preparing for a fight within the European Parliament to stop new regulations from hindering Poland's chances of tapping into the new source of energy, Polish Radio reported.

International energy giants such as ExxonMobil and Chevron have all bought licences to extract shale gas in Poland. Chevron has also been planning to explore shale the gas potential in Bulgaria and Romania.

Konrad Szymański, an MEP from the opposition Law and Justice party (European Conservatives and Reformists), warned on Polish Radio that left-wingers and environmentalists would attempt to challenge Sonik's report.

“There will be a huge battle", he said.

The deadline for tabling amendments to the Sonik report is 9 May.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • MEP Boguslaw Sonik’s draft report papers over the genuine risks that fracking poses to our water, our climate and our quality of life. Doing so serves the corporate agenda of fossil fuel companies, not the general interest of European citizens. We urge MEPs to vote against this report in its current form.

    Apart from the contents, the defensive tone of the report is problematic. Mr. Sonik dismisses significant new peer-reviewed scientific research that exposes the environmental pollution that has accompanied shale gas and shale oil development in the United States as ‘ideologically-biased’. This pollution directly endangers human and animal health, creates significant waste treatment and disposal challenges, and will only accelerate global climate change.

    Finally, Mr. Sonik fundamentally misunderstands the precautionary principle: the notion that the onus of the burden of proof of technological safety is on the user of the technology, not those concerned about their safety. He claims it is essential to apply it ‘to any future development of resources in Europe’, yet he fails to acknowledge that there is no systematic public health study of the cumulative impacts of shale development. Fracking for shale gas in Europe would be an uncontrolled public health experiment.

    By :
    Geert De Cock
    - Posted on :
    18/04/2012
  • It has been evident for decades that there is a satrong Marxist Communist thread in the "Green" movement. This report from Food and Water Europe proves it.

    I note there were no worries about danger from earth tremors when Coal Mining, largely run by the Communist leaning National Union of Mine Workers, was the direct cause of earth tremors.

    By :
    Rodney Atkinson
    - Posted on :
    19/04/2012
  • Ms Wenonah Hauter has no right to use her administrative position to attack MEP Boguslaw Sonik's draft report on the environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction. Saying at the beginning: "Doing so serves the corporate agenda of fossil fuel companies, not the general interest of European citizens" she closes any constructive discussion on the energy issue and on the real aspect of the food and water problems in EU! And what is in this important, she showed her true face that she serves the collective agenda of the "green" companies and not the general interest of European citizens.
    It is typical tactic of the applied anthropology and in that case her expression is bordering with the Orientalism.
    Ms Hauter can't accuse MEP Sonik of dismissing significant new peer-reviewed scientific research without presenting the source of the "scientific research" which most probably if exists comes from the censured (and not peer reviewed) publications controlled by the IPCC. Who told that the present EU policy concerning the boycott of the fossil fuels companies is correct?
    Ms Hauter forgets that manufacturing of the "clean energy" producing devices is done with the help of fossil fuels or other "dirty" energy. Probably she forgets or may be she doesn't know that no one can change laws of physics to produce energy with less of its true value.
    Also, it seems that Ms Hauter ignores the fact that the fossil fuels are the old organic materials, the components of million years of photosynthesis process, stored in the Earth crust. The struggle against global warming by reducing CO2 production can be likened to fighting a fire by suppressing only the smoke. The burning of fossil fuels may cause environmental pollution when it is done in an uncontrolled manner, but it certainly does not cause global warming.
    The MEP Sonik's draft report is the foundation to improve the economic situation in the EU which consequently improve the standard of living of its people. It is significant event in the current history of Europe.
    Dr Elsar A. Orkan
    Chairman, The Israeli Association for the Global Warming Fight (R.A.)

    By :
    Dr Elsar Amos Orkan
    - Posted on :
    20/04/2012
Background: 

Shale gas is an 'unconventional' fossil fuel that is found within natural fissures and fractures underground. Until recently, no method of safely transporting it to the surface existed.

However, by pumping water, sand and chemicals into rock formations under high pressure via a technique known as hydraulic fracturing or 'fracking', energy companies believe they have found a part of the answer to Europe's energy security problems.

The method remains intensely controversial because of its possible environmental risks, including poisoning groundwater and higher greenhouse gas emissions than traditional gas.

To proponents, shale gas represents a hitherto untapped and welcome alternative energy source to traditional fossil fuels. At the moment the continent depends on gas imported from Russia, and disputes between that country and Ukraine have disrupted winter supplies in recent years.

In the US, shale gas already accounts for 16% of the world's largest economy natural gas production and some analysts predict that could rise to 50% within 20 years.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Efficiency Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising