EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Putin fears shale gas competition

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 12 April 2012, updated 18 April 2012

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has urged his country's gas industry to "rise to the challenge" of shale gas as the United States and some European countries forge ahead with developing the controversial energy source.

US shale gas production may "seriously" restructure supply and demand in the global hydrocarbons market, Putin said yesterday (11 April) in his final address to the Russian Duma before he takes over as president on 7 May.

"Our country's energy companies absolutely have to be ready right now to meet this challenge," he said.

Putin said Russia must be prepared for "any external shocks" and "a new wave of technological change" that was "changing the configuration of global markets".

"I fully agree with the proposal of deputies that we need to create a better system for long-term macroeconomic, financial, technological and defence forecasting. This is especially important, given that the 21st century promises to be an epoch [of] new geopolitical, financial, economic, cultural and civilisation centres," he told Russia's lower house.

Bloomberg reported that the United States overtook Russia as the biggest producer of natural gas in 2009 as it extracted fuel trapped in shale (see background). That has slashed gas prices and led nations from China to Poland to explore exploiting shale gas, potentially cutting their reliance on Russian gas.

Russian propaganda?

France banned shale gas drilling out of ecological concerns. US energy giant Chevron suspended shale gas exploration activities in Bulgaria and Romania following ecological protests.

The Kyiv Post reports this is not the first time Putin has commented on shale gas. He mentioned it 18 months ago, saying that Russia's main energy company, Gazprom, needed to become more efficient in response to heightening competition.

Stratfor,  a US-based strategic intelligence company, says the Russian gas business is struggling with a number of problems, mostly related to its Byzantine pricing system that provides generous subsidies to domestic consumers.

Gazprom is also concerned about revenues from sales to Europe, which could fall as a result of price negotiations with many of its European customers.

Coupled with Europe's diversification of natural gas supplies away from Russia, this means Gazprom could soon be unable to continue offsetting its domestic losses with high profit margins from sales on the European market, Stratfor analysts say.

Positions: 

Ivan Matiyeshyn, co-founder of the Ukrainian Foundation for Democracy “People First”, argued that the optimal option for the Russian gas strategy is to create agreements with the rising gas powers from " the US, Canada, Norway, Britain which have the most advanced technologies on gas production for the diversification of its own exports to the Asian market."

"In case the plans of the US to supply gas to Europe are realised, Russia could compensate losses caused by the reduction of gas supplies to Europe.   In 2011 the volume of gas supplied by Russia to Europe was 150 billion cubic metres.  As a comparison, in 2011 the level of shale gas production in the US also came to about 150 billion cubic metres.  Besides, it is reasonable to expect that Gazprom will continue to realise the strategy of advancement of long-term contracts on gas supply to European consumers.  And if this strategy is supported by a successful Russia's entrance to the market of the Asian-Pacific region, Gazprom will manage to minimise its losses", Matiyeshyn said

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • If the competition in the energy market serves well the consumators within the EU it will be beneficial on the global market for the global consomators as well. So, I do not see any reason not to welcome such a competition and it would be in the best interest of Russia as well.

    Zoltan
    http://massaykosubekzoltan.webs.com/

    By :
    Zoltán MASSAY-KOSUBEK
    - Posted on :
    12/04/2012
  • "US energy giant Chevron suspended shale gas exploration activities in Bulgaria and Romania following ecological protests."

    Hmmm.... I wonder if those protests were truly home grown or instigated by certain "well meaning" advocates on loan from the near-abroad...

    By :
    CR
    - Posted on :
    12/04/2012
  • All studies of fracking for gas here in the USA have shown that there is no extra ground water pollution danger over conventional hydrocarbon extraction methods. Perhaps these environmentalists are what we call watermelons: Green on the outside, red on the inside.

    By :
    Lakelevel
    - Posted on :
    12/04/2012
  • Being able to discover the instigation of the demonstrations throughout Europe, if they are done by the Russian Security people with experience in the KGB may take some real digging. For instance, when the KGB archives opened up in 1992 for a short time, one of the things noted was a file detailing the six layers of cut-outs the KGB used to finance the Greenham Commons demonstrations camp-out against the US cruise missiles stationed in Britain in response to the SS-20s deployed against NATO targets in Western Europe. Apparently there was even some bragging in the file about losing no more than 5 percent of the total "donated" at each step in those six layers, on average. From that, I may assume the usual average transfer cost" was higher.

    You would have to walk back the chain of donations, if it exists. Of course,it is always possible that people outside Russia are foolish enough on their own to absorb and believe the anti-industrial blather of the Deep Ecology movement, and donate and demonstrate on their own. Look at the EU's anti-GM movement, and you could not doubt the potential for it all being internal to the EU.

    By :
    Tom Billings
    - Posted on :
    12/04/2012
  • To answer CR: I do not agree to your not
    concretely named "studies". You must read the
    FAMOUS STUDIES of Cornell and Duke-Universities
    which both prove the enormous DANGER FOR
    GROUND WATER POLLUTION extra from fracking.

    J. Sieveking

    By :
    Jürgen Sieveking
    - Posted on :
    15/04/2012
  • On april 21st this year a big campaign named “Is it really Putin?” will take place in the biggest Russian cities. We don’t trust Putin anymore, because his clan got richer than the richest man in the world, but the population of the country is rapidly decreasing as like as it was while the World War.

    95 per cent of industrial enterprises and banks are in foreigner’s hands. Our country is almost sold without fight. NATO has the right to be a host on our land!

    Now they want to allow landing of super heavyweight cargo airplanes from Afganistan. We are assured that it’s going to be just a logistical base, but we think it’s a lie – we are sure it’s going to be NATO base and we are not able to control what they will transport on those planes.
    Putin gave our Amur islands to China and now Chinese army in no time can trespass Russian border. Razor wire is taken away and our border guards are moved to centre of the country.

    Our raw products are being transferred abroad, the country is being pulled in World Trade Organization( WTO) which means our products will cost as much as imoprterd ones for us. We will be eating GMO products as it’s one of the WTO terms.

    We don’t trust Putin, because he won the elections by breaking the law (he made up a filter for those who wanted to take part in elections and be a president). Only for that he had to be removed from the elections.

    We don’t trust Putin because we are not even sure that the person who has been on TV, has taken all decisions, has appeared at conferences for the last 12 years is real Putin. His appearance differs from one he had years ago. It makes us think they fob us off Putin doubles. It means our country is ruled by strangers.

    We call for specialists (criminalists, photographers, cosmetic surgeons, workers of airports, etc) to help find and analyze materials and prove that Putin is not real.
    For more information about us at volya-naroda.ru
    Telephone number - +79278125256
    E-mail contact@raznesi.info
    Come to the rally on April 21st! Let’s make impeachment out of this inauguration!

    By :
    Helena
    - Posted on :
    18/04/2012
Background: 

Shale gas is an 'unconventional' fossil fuel that is found within underground fissures and fractures. Until recently, no method of safely transporting it to the surface existed.

However, by pumping water, sand and chemicals into rock formations under high pressure via a technique known as hydraulic fracturing or 'fracking', energy companies believe they have found a part of the answer to Europe's energy security problems.

The method remains intensely controversial because of its possible environmental risks, including poisoning groundwater and higher greenhouse gas emissions than traditional gas.

To proponents, shale gas represents a hitherto untapped and welcome alternative energy source to traditional fossil fuels. At the moment the continent depends on gas imported from Russia, and disputes between that country and Ukraine have disrupted winter supplies in recent years.

In the US, shale gas already accounts for 16% of natural gas production and some analysts predict that could rise to 50% within 20 years.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Energy Supply News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Energy Supply Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising