EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Renewable energies continue to need support says report

Published 26 October 2005 - Updated 29 June 2007
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

On the eve of the eagerly awaited Commission communication on national support schemes for renewable energies, a multi-stakeholder Task Force has argued for support to continue until at least 2015.

A few days before the Commission is due to present its report, the Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) presented a study on 'Market Stimulation for Renewable Electricity in the EU'. The report is the work of stakeholder Task Force, composed of industry representatives, environmental NGOs and other stakeholders, organised by  CEPS and the Dutch Energy research Centre (ECN) and chaired by the International Energy Agency. 

The report makes the case for continuing support for renewable electricity for a number of reasons, most notably the reduction of technology cost of RES production. At the same time, the report confirms concerns that rising volumes of power produced from RES coupled with different national support systems could result in distortions in Europe's renewable electricity markets, which raises trade barriers and impacts on competition. As a result, the authors see the need to harmonise the different EU support schemes. Policy harmonisation would, according to the experts, increase the stability of the power grid and allow for economies of scale through liquid and efficient markets.

However, the report concedes that harmonisation would be difficult to implement at present, mainly due to the fact that many member states have only recently implemented their national support policies. As a result, it proposes a time-table for harmonisation:

  • by 2007: analysis of best practises of support schemes; harmonisation of the total level of support; planning if grid extension; promotion of better authorisation prodecures;
  • by 2010: harmonisation of support schemes (to come into force by 2016) and of the EU framework; harmonised RE-GO schemes; harmonisation of national grid access codes;
  • after 2015: phase-out of mandatory support.

The expert panel also makes several recommendations to both national authorities and the Commission on ways to further promote the development of RES:

  • Targets beyond 2010 should be set in order to provide more investment security. These targets should be high enough to provide an extra stimulous to RES, but not overly ambitious, which could impact on the competitiveness of electricity-intensitve economic activities. Member states should be able to merge their targets;
  • Harmonised, reliable and accurate renewable energy guarantees-of-origin (RE-GOs) systems must be implemented as soon as possible in order to remove trade barriers to cross-border RES trade.
  • Network improvements will be essential to facilitate a greater uptake of renewable power in the European grid;
  • Member states should use the forthcoming review of best practice to implement adjustments to their respective schemes;
  • The EU's various energy and environment policy instruments should be better co-ordinated in order to come to one coherent structure. In particular, the emissions trading scheme (ETS) and the renewables directive pursue different objectives, which could hamper member states' support for RES;
  • The international dimension of RES policy should be explored through the integration of non-EU countries in the EU renewables policy framework.
Positions: 

Stakeholders have generally welcomed the CEPS report, saying that given the current circumstances and diverging views on the issue of harmonisation of RES support systems, it was a good compromise.

DG TREN's Head of Unit for Renewable Energy, Luc Werring, said that he was "very impressed with the high quality of the report" and that it has served as a basis for the upcoming Commission communication on RES support systems. Despite frequent speculations about the outcome of the Commission's work, he underlined that the report was still in an ongoing consultation period, so the result was not a forgone conclusion. Mr Werring agreed that member states should be able to fuse their national targets, and that imported green energy can be counted towards the targets if the exporting country explicitely agrees to this.

The EP's energy expert and rapporteur on energy efficiency, Mechtild Rothe, emphasised that a harmonisation of the support systems could only work in a non-distorted market place and that, at the moment, this is not the case. She also underlined the need for post-2010 targets, pointing to recent Parliament resolutions on setting a 20% target for RES for 2020. In her view, the feed-in system such as it is used in Germany, Denmark and Spain, has produced the best results.

Speaking for the European wind energy industryEWEA's Christian Kjaer criticised the inclusion of a specific timetable for the harmonisation of support schemes in the CEPS report. "Currently, competition in the EU energy market is a myth. Until we have a real internal energy market, we cannot introduce competition in renewables. We would otherwise end up with two distorted markets," he said. For him, the name of a support system does not matter, as long as it provides for investor certainty in the crucial first 10-years of renewables investments. "If we were to harmonise the systems now, we would create uncertainty at a critical point in RES development," he warned.

The European transmission system operators (ETSO), however, have called for a harmonised support system across the EU, which, according to them, would greatly facilitate the grid integration of RES. Moreover, ETSO is in favour of market tools rather than regulatory schemes to promote renewable energy production.

EURELECTRIC, the Union of the Electricity Industry, has long criticised the "substantial and unlimited" subsidies for RES. The association calls for harmonised support schemes for RES, which have to be market based, capital efficient and designed to avoid market distortions.

Next steps: 
  • 27 October 2005: The Commission is to present a report on the experience gained from the application and coexistence of various support schemes in the Member States. This report can be accompanied by a proposal for an EU-wide framework for RES support schemes, but this is deemed unlikely. 
  • 31 December 2005: The Commission is to publish a report on the implementation of the Renewables Directive.
  • 27 October 2010: Member States are to achieve their national targets.  
Background: 

Most stakeholders agree that in order to get renewable energies off the ground, specific support is needed, at least for the first time period, in which important investments need to be undertaken. When the EU discussed the Renewable Energy Directive, which was adopted in 2001, no decision was taken on the nature that a common support scheme should take for the whole EU. As a result, member states were left to devise their own systems.

Two main types of regulatory policies have been used to open the grid to renewables: 

  • Feed-in pricing system: electric utilities are obliged to enable renewable energy plants to connect to the electric grid, and they must purchase any electricity generated with renewable resources at fixed minimum prices. These prices are generally set higher than the regular market price, and payments are usually guaranteed over a specified period of time. This system is used in some of the EU's biggest renewables producers such as Germany and Spain.
  • Quota system: governments set a minimum share of power to be produced from renewable sources. The share required often increases gradually over time, with a specific final target and end-date. The mandate can be placed on producers, distributors or consumers. This system is used in the UK, amongst other countries. 

This decentralised approach towards support systems can work well as long as the volume of energy produced by renewable sources remains limited. However, four years on, with the renewables market growing at around 5% per year across the EU, there are concerns that different national solutions are creating trade barriers and distort competition in the internal market. Moreover, possible efficiency gains thanks to economies of scale, could be lost in such a system.

The Commission will shortly present a report on the implementation of the renewables directive, in which it will assess the experience with the different support schemes. This report can be accompanied by a proposal for a community framework in order to harmonise the systems. However, recent remarks by Energy Commissioner Piebalgs have hinted that there would not be a harmonisation at this point.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Advertising

Théâtre National - Brussels

30 May 2012:
Théâtre National - Brussels

Maastricht

04 June 2012 - 05 June 2012:
Maastricht
06 June 2012 - 07 June 2012:

Lyon

Advertising