EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Backdoor deals give Serbia EU candidate status

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 02 March 2012, updated 05 March 2012

Serbia clinched its coveted status of EU candidate country at a summit in Brussels last night (1 March), after Bucharest dropped its opposition following an agreement on a roadmap that should see Romania enter theSchengen passport-free area in September.

As Romanian President Traian Băsescu arrived at the summit, it was already clear that he had dropped his opposition to Serbia's EU candidate status.

The coveted status is a breakthrough for Serbia and opens the doors for accession negotiations, which may lead to full membership in the next five or six years.

"Green light for Serbia", Băsescu said, pressed by journalists at the Council doorstep.

The road has been a rocky one, however. During a dramatic meeting at the ministerial level on 28 February, Romania took its EU partners by surprise when it announced it had concerns over the rights of ethnic Romanians living in Serbia. Some members of the 40,000-strong ethnic Vlach community also consider themselves Romanian, while other Vlachs think of themselves as Serbian.

The move raised eyebrows among EU ministers, while in Serbia anti-Romanian sentiments started spreading like a forest fire.

This led to frantic behind-the-scenes talks ahead of the EU summit. In what appeared like a face-saving effort, Bucharest and Belgrade signed a bilateral agreement at the ambassadorial level yesterday morning, providing for the better protection for the Romanian minority in Serbia.

European Council President Herman Van Rompuy, just re-elected for a second two-and-a-half-year term, voiced his satisfaction at a late-night news conference.

"This is a remarkable achievement, a result of the efforts demonstrated by both sides in the dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina," Van Rompuy said. "I hope it will encourage Serbia to take further efforts in order to meet the political and economic criteria for the EU membership. It is also my hope that Belgrade will continue to support regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations in the Western Balkans".

Link or no link?

Then immediately Van Rompuy started describing the efforts to solve the stalemate over the bid of Romania and Bulgaria to join the Schengen border-free area. The issue was on the summit agenda, following successive failures of the Hungarian and Polish EU presidencies to resolve the case.

The Netherlands has opposed the two countries' membership bid as it considers them unprepared to enter Schengen, citing Commission progress reports on judicial reform and the fight against corruption.

Van Rompuy said: "After intensive preparatory consultations in the last weeks, we now have a roadmap. We ask the Justice and Home Affairs Council to adopt in September its decision, and in the meantime, to identify and implement measures aimed at contributing to the success of the process. I would like to thank the Romanian president, the Bulgarian prime minister and the Dutch prime minister for their constructive attitude during the final negotiations this afternoon under my chairmanship."

Romanian President Băsescu, Bulgarian Prime Minister Boyko Borissov and his Dutch counterpart Mark Rutte met in Van Rompuy's office just before the start of the summit. The agreement reached, which is expected to be part of the summit's conclusions, provides for a conditional accession to Schengen later in the year.

Asked if Romania had "bullied" its way into Schengen by threatening to veto Serbia's bid, Van Rompuy appeared unconvincing in denying that the two issues had been linked at any moment.

"The measures are aimed to reassure those who have some fears that this accession will cause problems. I have the feeling now there is s strong political will to finalise the work in September," Van Rompuy said.

Bulgaria keeps cool

Unlike Romania, Bulgaria has kept cool on the Schengen stalemate.

Bulgaria too has a national minority in Serbia, and its situation has also been a cause of concern. Asked to comment on how his government was hoping to address the problem, Borissov said earlier yesterday that his country has always supported Serbia's candidacy, and that he addresses the problems of the Bulgarian minority each time he meets with Serbian Prime Minister Boris Tadić.

Asked to comment on the Dutch veto of Bulgaria's Schengen bid, Borissov said that for him the case was "closed" by the fact that his country had fulfilled all Schengen requirements and spent considerable amounts for that purpose. He said Bulgaria's border with Turkey - also and EU candidate - was already guarded according to Schengen standards.

European Commission sources told EurActiv that they had been under considerable pressure from all sides over the Schengen stalemate. The most intriguing revelation appears to be that in December, Rutte had pressed Commission President José Manuel Barroso to formally link the monitoring of Bulgaria and Romania under the Cooperation and Verification mechanism (see background) to the two countries'Schengen accession. The request was bluntly rejected by Barroso, the source said.

Next steps: 
  • Sept. 2012: Justice and Home Affairs Council under Cyprus EU presidency to decide the Schengen accession of Bulgaria and Romania
Georgi Gotev

COMMENTS

  • And now we are all happy. Serbia is a candidate and Romania has finally showed some muscle! If we don;t stand up for our rights, no one will. no other country got what it wanted without fighting for it. They call us bullies, because we finally had the guts to use our powers in the Council to fight for what we want. I call us brave for the first time. We will never get rid of this second hand country label if we sit in the corner and cry. ironic how the bullied is called a bullier the moment it stands up for itself. Mi se pare ca Uniunea Europeana merge putin pe principiul: vrem egalitate dar nu pentru catei.

    By :
    Andreea Per
    - Posted on :
    02/03/2012
  • While I feel it is good for the EU to reward the Serb Government for all of their efforts, I am not sure the Serb people deserve Candidate Status until they become more apologetic for the criminal behavior of some of their own past governmental leaders and military units and especially the leaders who were recently arrested and are being tried in Belgium. I believe over 50% of the Serbs think these people, some of which are still free,are heros. When the Serbs show they are ready to live alongside other peoples without wanting to be aggressive, they should be included in the EU and not before.

    By :
    Julien Houle
    - Posted on :
    02/03/2012
  • I welcome any guarantees to protect minorities in Serbia. It's a hard life for them in the Balcans.

    By :
    Radu
    - Posted on :
    03/03/2012
  • This is a progress and it will only better EU and Serbia as well. After all, Serbia is geographicaly part of Europe and cannot be excluded from the Union.However, conditioning Serbia to accept Kosovo independence is not a constructive part of the deal. What will happen to the Serbs living there? Romania has tried to veto Serbian entry in EU and them being proud of it because of 30.000 Vlachs out of which 50% call themselves Serbs. and that is ok. but when Serbia expresses concerns over it population in Kosovo, it is ignored.

    By :
    RADA
    - Posted on :
    03/03/2012
  • There was a war in Yugoslavia created by those who wanted a free market. Croats were told to go independent by Germany. When there is a war people die. Serbia wanted Yugo to stay together, but no one else did. Do not blame Serbia. I am Serb and I lost my relatives who lived there. You have your heroes and the Serbs have theirs.Think twice before getting involved again in a war that kills children, women, and men.

    By :
    Kathryn
    - Posted on :
    06/03/2012
  • for RADA
    think logically, is it normal that 50% of the Vlachs calle themselves Serbs, or is it the pressure from the Serbian government that forced them to call themselves Serbs? Let's say that in 10 years from now, 50% of the Serbs from Kosovo will call themselves Kosovars and not Serbians, even if they will continue to speak Serbian as their native tongue. Wouldn't you consider that this change for only half of their population would be due to pressures from the authorities, pressures that forced them to change their identity against their will and against normality? The same thing it is about Vlachs in Serbia, if they all declare a Romanian dialect as their native tongue, then they all are Romanian ethnics, even if they call themselves Serbs, just because the latter were probably forced to do so against their will.

    By :
    Luke
    - Posted on :
    07/03/2012
  • I don't think that giving Serbia the Candidate Status was the right move, or at least it was very premature. Serbia has never apologized for the war crimes it committed in the Balkans. It would be similar to Germany not apologizing for the WWII crimes, and claiming that the Nazis were heroes, yet still be allowed to join the EU. You still have plenty of people in Serbia who are ready to wage war, and show militaristic attitude. How can this attitude help the EU? If Serbia at this state gets in the EU, then who not Russia, Belarus or Syria? In the end, what is the difference?

    By :
    Vasili
    - Posted on :
    07/03/2012
Băsescu: 'Serbia has green light'
Background: 

When Romania and Bulgaria joined the EU on 1 January 2007, shortcomings remained regarding judicial reform and the fight against corruption - and in the case of Bulgaria, the fight against organised crime.

A 'Cooperation and Verification' monitoring mechanism was set up to assist both countries in adapting to EU standards, starting from the date of their accession. In September 2010, European affairs ministers decided to extend Brussels' monitoring of Romania and Bulgaria.

Sofia and Bucharest had set March 2011 as the deadline to join Schengen but their accession was delayed. The two applicants suffered another setback in June 2011, when EU ministers decided to postpone their decision for 22 September. A similar setback took place in December, when EU leaders put the item on the agenda of the 1-2 March 2012 summit.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising