EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Croatian leader tries to ease tensions over war crimes law

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 26 October 2011

Croatian President Ivo Josipović said that he is willing to broker an agreement to defuse tensions with Serbia, which indicted Croatian nationals on war crimes charges stemming from the fratricidal wars between 1991 and 1995.

Josipović said negotiations are better for Croatia than a recently adopted law that seeks to void war crimes indictments sent from Serbia, the Croatian agency HINA reported.

The law was drafted hastily after Serbia issued indictments for war crimes against Croatian nationals, including prominent political figures such as Vladimir Šeks, the former speaker of parliament and member of the centre-right HDZ party that governs Croatia.

The European Commission had called for ''prudence'' and ''careful consideration'' with regard to the Croatia government's push to pass the bill earlier this month.

Josipović said on Monday a bilateral agreement would put an end to further groundless prosecutions of Croatian war veterans and enable the continuation of cooperation in dealing with war crimes.

"I call on the [Croatian] government to embark on that together," Josipović is quoted as saying, reiterating that the new law harmed Croatia as it did not prevent situations in which war veterans could be prosecuted without probable cause.

Josipović, a Social Democrat, is at odds with Prime Minister Jadranka Kosor, the HDZ leader, in advance of parliamentary elections due in December.

Explaining that he would request the Constitutional Court to review the new law, Josipović argued that it undermines cooperation between Croatian and Serbian prosecutors which he described as good. Josipović said that the measure could also damage relations between Croatia and Serbia, adding that Brussels was in doubt whether Zagreb was serious about strengthening the rule of law.

Croatia has concluded its EU accession negotiations, but is being monitored for progress in law enforcement until its accession, expected on 1 July 2013. The accession treaty is expected to be signed on 19 December in Warsaw.

Josipović said he would call the elections after consultations with the parliamentary parties, adding that he might announce the date on Friday.

Next steps: 
  • 4 Dec.: Parliamentary elections in Croatia
  • 19 Dec.: Croatia signs its EU accession Treaty
  • Jan. 2012: Croatia to hold referendum on its accession
Euractiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Amazing- Serbia, which started 4 unprovoked wars in a row in the Balkans and committed war crimes which almost defy the mind wants to charge the victims of its aggression with crimes against humanity. This is a bit like former SS officers launching a war crimes suite against Poland or the Ukraine. Its no wonder that Europe is fast fading into irrelevance- with a mentality of treating the victims of aggression in the same light as the instigators of that aggression, Europe has said to the world loud and clear that it truly has lost the plot.

    By :
    bman
    - Posted on :
    26/10/2011
  • There is no question that Serbia wasthe aggressor in the Balkans wars, the aims for a greater Serbia are well documented! Now they would be the victims too? I ask anybody to explain to me how Serbs who were 12%of Croatia's population in 1990 took by force over 30% of Croatian territory and still call that anything but agression! No, a spade is a spade. The guilty mist pay for their crimes and agressor states are doomed to be pariah states until they come to terms with their crimes.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    26/10/2011
  • Dear Editors, in the following sentence, you are mistaking the ICC for the ICJ:

    In the immediate aftermath of the Croatian presidential elections, held on 10 January 2010, the newly-elected president, Ivo Josipović, foresaw a potential halt of the legal war between Croatia and Serbia at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague regarding genocide accusations.

    Regards,

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    26/10/2011
  • Maybe we should ask the Khymer Rouge to sue their victims or Al-Queda could always take the families of the 9/11 victims to court over the death of Bin Laden. Better still, if there are any old Nazis left, maybe they could take Israel to court over their own 'pain and suffering'?
    There are too many fools running Europe- both politically and also in the media and the claim that Europe is 'civilised' is a joke. The Serbs were the aggressors in the Balkan, and not for the first time mind you, and any attempt to rewrite this hard historical fact is nothing short of revisionism and pro-genocidal propaganda.

    By :
    ap
    - Posted on :
    26/10/2011
  • Its pretty simple to explain why Serbs who were 12% of the population captured 30% of Croatia's territory. Its because Serbs tended to live in agricultural/rural areas in the Krajina and Slavonia. As you know, rural areas tend to be sparesely populated...But that doesn't change the fact that Serbs formed a MAJORITY on 30% of Croatia's territory even if they were only 12% of the population. Therefore there was no aggression...the only aggression was when Croatia unilaterally seceded from Yugoslavia and forced Serbs in Croatia to secede with them, even though they wanted to keeep living in Yugoslavia. Get your facts straight.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    26/10/2011
  • Its amazing how some Serbs think they had the 'right' to succeed from HR. If you want to talk about 'getting your facts straight', under the Constitution of SFRJ, each Republic had the 'right' to succeed if it wanted to-- politically it may have been another story but under pure legal terms it was well within its rights. No such legal rights were applied to minorities in those Republics.
    And if we take Serb thinking to its logical end, then Croats in Vojvodina and BiH have the right to succeed as well.

    By :
    ap
    - Posted on :
    26/10/2011
  • Amazing how the Croats thebiggest and most evil supporters of Nazism are trying to label Serbs Nazi's the only people who actually stood up to them. The simple fact is Croatia's wartime commanders have been tried and found guilty of ethnic cleansing and judged to have formed a "joint criminal enterprise". The biggest ethnic cleansing occurred against the Serbs of Croatia where most of the population was forced to leave in the face of murder and terror. So there goal of trying to rid Serbs of Croatia in WW2 who have lived there for centuries was achieved in the last war.

    This policy of sticking their heads in the sand and blaming everyone else needs to be addressed by the EU and especially property rights that were illegally confiscated must compensated.

    It's laughable that they compare the conflict with Nazi's and Jews as you would only have to ask any Jew what kind of people the croatians are as there is plenty of information about them in every holocaust shrine and museum.

    By :
    Eric
    - Posted on :
    26/10/2011
  • It's amazing that Serbia is still up to it's dirty tricks again. The greater serbia dream is completely gone and so is it's attempt to occupy the coastal/sea which is a tourist money making haven. Serbia has no sea which is what the always wanted. Oh well, as the saying goes "Nemate More".

    By :
    Zadom Spremni
    - Posted on :
    27/10/2011
  • Please feel free to take a look at the 1990 Yugoslavian census before telling anyone about how much territory Serbs were actually the majority on. If this adds up to 30% then Mathematics education in Serbia is seriously lacking.. Perhaps as much as honesty and integrity. Please look at the map and tell me how the Serbs who made up 12% could have claimed more that 30% of territory by force. Keep in mind this is Yugoslavia's census information not Croatia's.
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hrvatske_etnije.gif

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    27/10/2011
  • Serbia throughout the 90's was a pariah state, isolated and under sanctions, the intelligentsia left in droves. The only support came from other black sheep states- China, Cuba, North Korea, Iraq, Russia etc.. With friends like these we hardly needed enemies, bit we had those too! First the Slovenes and Croats, followed by the western Europeans, then South American states, Canada, and the USA. Now it's easy to say what makes the US and EU the moral compass and Russia the black sheep, but there is a history of democracy and freedom those countries have that lends them credibility; case in point how many Serbs moved to Germany compared to Bulgaria! No we have a dark legacy but we have heavy pride. Most Serbs did not believe the stories on the western news, Srebrenica was Turkish propaganda until recently. The transition to becoming a progressive democracy means taking ownership of our past. We did not all support Milosevic but we did not stop him. The dream of greater Serbia was hypnotic and we believed so many lies that only now our media admits to. We will recover but the sooner we accept our role as the aggressors the better. Crimes were admitted by all sides, but we must acknowledge our own

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    27/10/2011
  • Serbs are nothing but war lovers and have a history of criminal war crime acts. Serb are responsible for “ethnic cleansing” in Srebrenica by raping, burying alive & killing thousands (Including Kids) women & men in mass burial graves throughout Croatia and Bosnia.

    It’s amazing how the serbs are the biggest & most evil supporters of War Crimes. Ratko Mladic & Rodovan Karadsic are the butchers of Europe and are war crime commanders who are found guilty in the Hague of crimes against humanity. Biggest crimes since WW2.

    It’s laughable that the serbs try playing down their war crimes which the world has seen. Ask a Jew what the serbs are like and they would say that they would never of imagined to see “Concentration Camps” in Europe in this day and age which the murderous serbs set up during the early 1990’s. There is plenty of information about the Serbs attrocities and war crimes acts by a simple google search.

    By :
    Ante Gotovina
    - Posted on :
    27/10/2011
  • The secret Serb genocide roll call- almost 800,000 Serb Muslims 'disappear' into thin air between 1868-1914, 200,000 Albanians killed by Serbs in the Second Balkan War of 1913, 150,000 Bosnian Muslims 'disappear' between 1918-1924, Croatia's population 'shrinks' by 8.5% between 1918-1941, During WWII according to Yugo figures, the number of Croats 'shrinks' by 14.5%; 1942, Serbia declared 'Jew Free by Germans, 1945-1948- 420,000 ethnic Germans 'disappear' from Serbia, 1944-1946, 180,000 Albanians killed by Serbs, during the same period, 110,000 Hungarians, 20,000 Bulgarians, 12,000 Rumanians, 10,000 Montenegrins, 8000 Macedonians and about 5000 Ukrainians and many others killed by Serb forces.
    1991, Serbia attacks Slovenia & Croatia, 33,000 dead all up, 1992, Serbs attack Bosnia, 120,000 dead in total, 1999, Serbia attacks Kosovo-Metohija, 50,000 dead all up.
    If I were a Serb, I would not be talking about other people being 'nazis'.

    By :
    ap
    - Posted on :
    27/10/2011
  • To say that Serbs committed all the war crimes in Balkans wars is not accurate and frankly ridiculous. Crimes in wartime are sad reality and never one sided. Still, we must accept the lion's share of blame for the wars, afterall anybody alive in Serbia in 1991-99 will attest to very dubious media reports and very aggressive propaganda from the Milosevic regime. I went to many weddings in those days and there was not an eyebrow raised when the nationalist merriment turned into "greater Serbia" rhetoric. To be honest we were convinced it was our right to re-draw the borders. One can argue if this was right or not, but clearly the West and most progressives felt this was at least expansionism and probably more accurately aggression. The inviolable notion of a sovereign state meant we could not do this. Nonetheless the double standard over Kosovo is sickening now. The only way we can understand this is to assume that we are being punished as an aggressor and aggressors are never treated fairly. So we can blame the USA and EU for our situation but perhaps we should look at ourselves. We followed Milosevic blindly into our own mess. Anyone who forgets this probably remembers how they voted and how they sang. Now we cry.

    By :
    Miljenko
    - Posted on :
    28/10/2011
  • "To say that Serbs committed all the war crimes in Balkans wars is not accurate and frankly ridiculous"...that statement would be true except for three important facts.
    1. There is not a country, race, ethnic group, religious minority or ethno-religious sub-group in the Balkans that in the past 150 years has not at the very least had some quarrel with the Serbs...I wonder what the mathematical probability is that everyone else in the Balkans is evil yet one group, in this case, the Serbs are always somehow supposedly innocent?
    2. When you start a war there are always consequences -- this is known as 'cause and effect'-- and in the minds of most rational human beings, those that start wars are always more guilty than those who react and try and exact some form of revenge for being attacked/oppressed or wiped out.
    3. Not one of those peoples that the Serbs have attacked, oppressed or brutalised have ever launched or even dreamt of launching an attack on Serbia itself.

    By :
    ap
    - Posted on :
    28/10/2011
  • I am acknowledging that the blame for the wars rests primarily on Serbia and the government of Milosevic. This is an unpopular sentiment amongst die-hard nationalists that would re-write history- either blaming the Croats, the Slovenes, the Bosnians or whomever. Nonetheless, my point is simply that we are being punished for this unsavory role in recent history. If we are to look at 150 years of history, perhaps the Croats can educate us on a small piece of history around 1941-45? Well that does nobody any good. The War in Croatia was not about Nazis and Ustahe anybody alive then will tell you that this was a war of 2 ideologies: progressive western reform or dominant Belgrade government. When you consider the money Croatian and Slovenian development brought to Yugoslavia from 1971-90, you can see why they BG government refused to let the most prosperous republics go. This was the center of the issue! Croatia and Slovenia could not rob Slobo of a greater Serbia- ie Yugoslavia! When the writing was on the wall, the next best thing was to tug on Serbian nationalist heart strings and play the greater Serbia card. I am only asking for perspective. Do not confuse history with politics. Politics perverts history, history shames politics. Would we not have been better off letting Croatia and Slovenia go? Now we have lost Kosovo, sanctions and bombings set us back decades and we are ashamed of our reputation in the West so we turn to Russia and salvation. Truly dark days are upon us!

    By :
    Miljenko
    - Posted on :
    28/10/2011
  • I will agree with your comments, Serbia was lead astray by Milosevic but the majority of Serbs did not see him as a leader but rather a dictator. I served JNA, I saw limited action on the Croatian front and I can say for certain that crimes were committed by everyone. The difference my Croat co-workers point at is that those crimes occurred in Croatia and as a result of some pretty brutal military action on the part of the JNA. We used to say, "don't send a soldier to do what a shell can do" and if you talk to people that were in Vukovar this was the mindset in the early days. We shelled Vulovar until it was rubble and told the world it was to preserve Yugoslavia. Then 6 days after we took the town, I saw the Croat flag torn down and replaced by a Serbian flag. Now a handful of Macedonians, Montenegrins, and even Albanians were part of our brigada and demanded the true Jugo flag be raised but that never happened. I can tell you this because I saw it. I always felt like a Yugoslav, that's how I was raised but those weeks we spent patrolling I never felt like it was anything but an occupation. I can also tell you that we found tanks with dead men inside. The Croats waited for our tanks and lured them into tight quarters then dropped grenades from roof tops where our guns couldn't get at. Once disabled, they would drop a lit Molotov into the tank and let the men burn to death. True brutality I thought. Now I think, wow, we sent tanks into neighborhoods of a town where we knew the locals.

    By :
    Jovan
    - Posted on :
    28/10/2011
  • You think that is something? I remember when we driving through Karlovac (close to Croatian capital Zagreb) for a Kristening and the road was closed. We got out and what do we see? A Croatian fire fighting air tanker dropped washing machines full of bottles, rocks, nails, and car parts on a colony of army trucks. Don't think anybody was dead but a few people were cut up severely. Imagine the look on thes poor boys faces, they are driving and all of a sudden it starts raining washing machines! There were small craters where they hit! We had to laugh a little but it was a crazy time. I wouldn't say I'm friends with any Croats but I do have to credit the ingenuity and resourcefulness! I know what you mean about the brutality being portrayed as one-sided because it was within Croatia but then Albanian brutality against Serbs was within Serbia! Bit of a double standard no? I guess it's all punishment and perception.

    By :
    Milan
    - Posted on :
    28/10/2011
  • In the past 1400 years, every single country or ethnic group that has attacked and/or occupied Croatia today either no longer exists or is festering in some historical sludge pit- the Avars, the Franks, Byzantium, Venice, Hungary, the Mongols, Turkey, Austria, Yugoslavia and of course Serbia.
    Some would say this is a coincidence, I however think it is closer to karma.

    In 584 AD we came to our present-day homeland as part of the marauding and nomadic Avaric Confederation, and we saw what no one else saw, we understood what no else one understood and we felt what no-one else felt the moment we set foot on Lijepa Nasa - and no-one, least of all those that we consider to be beneath us, will ever tell us how we will live on our land.

    By :
    ap
    - Posted on :
    30/10/2011
  • Avari - Avarati - Hrvati.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2011
  • @ above.
    Croatia under the former Yugoslav law system never had the right to sucede as a republic without the agreement of the serbs who were a constitutive people of SR Croatia.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2011
Ivo Josipovic
Background: 

Croatia fought for its independence from the former Yugoslavia in a war which lasted from 1991 to 1995. Atrocities were committed by both sides during the conflict.

Some of the questions that still burden bilateral relations include the fate of the people who disappeared during the war, the return of Serbian refugees who left Croatia during the war, war crimes, the division of the Former Yugoslavia's property, and mutual lawsuits for genocide.

Serbia filed a lawsuit for genocide against Croatia at the International Court of Justice on 4 January 2010, a move seen as retaliation to an earlier lawsuit lodged by Croatia. Serbs' claims of genocide refer to Operation Storm in 1995, while Croatia's accusations are instead linked to Slobodan Milosevic's ethnic cleansing. 

In the immediate aftermath of the Croatian presidential elections, held on 10 January 2010, the newly-elected president, Ivo Josipović, foresaw a potential halt of the legal war between Croatia and Serbia at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague regarding genocide accusations.

In July 2010, Josipović paid his first official visit to Serbia. Together with Serbian President Boris Tadić, he agreed that the two countries had no reason to "look back at the past."

For his part, Serbian President Boris Tadić’s apologised in November 2010 for crimes committed at Vukovar, a Croatian town devastated during the country's war of independence in the early 1990s. The gesture was warmly welcomed by Enlargement Commissioner Štefan Füle.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 3

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising