According to a fresh report by the European Citizen Action Service (ECAS) entitled "Who's afraid of EU enlargement?", over a year after May 2004 the EU-15 states apply four different types of immigration regimes:
- restrictive, where EU-8 citizens are treated the same way as non-EEA citizens (Belgium, Finland, Germany, Greece, France, Luxembourg and Spain)
- restrictive with a quota for EU-8 citizens (Austria, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal)
- general labour market access with limited welfare benefits (Ireland, UK)
- Community regime fully applied (Sweden)
In turn, the new member states are also entitled to impose reciprocal curbs on workers from the EU-15 states. However, only Hungary and Poland have resorted to this to date.
Having analysed labour market data from 20 member states (Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal and Spain have failed to provide official figures), ECAS has found, among others, that
- Poland, the largest new member state, has the most nationals abroad
- the non-restrictive approach of Ireland, the UK and Sweden has attracted significantly more migrants than in the pre-enlargement days
- the member states with restrictive regimes risk an expansion of the black labour market, the actual scale of which remains hard to estimate
- alongside "brain drain", "youth drain" has become a major concern for some of the EU-8 states
- to date, only "fragmented information" has been made available by Eurostat and the national statistical offices on the labour market impact of enlargement and the "results" of the transitional measures
- the practical issues of residing and working abroad are hardly known to the member states' citizens. Confusion reigns over the rights and conditions of entry and residence
- ECAS quotes analysts as saying that "employment restrictions have little impact on actual migration from the new member states, but they answer domestic political concerns in the context of slowing economies, high unemployment and anti-immigration sentiments"



