EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EP seeks clarity on Union's 'absorption capacity'

Published 16 March 2006
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

Enlargement is recognised by the MEPs as one of the EU's most powerful policy tools, but a new report focusses attention on the Union's absorption capacity and urges the creation of a multilateral framework as a stepping stone to full membership.

In its plenary session on 15 March, the European Parliament discussed a report, drafted by German MEP Elmar Brok, chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, on the EU’s future enlargement strategy. The own-initiative report is a critical look at the Commission’s enlargement strategy as spelled out by the latter in 2005. The plenary session is scheduled to vote on the report on 16 March. 

Among other issues, the report: 

  • Calls for a comprehensive Europe-wide communication strategy to address the public’s “legitimate concerns”; 
  • Calls on the Commission to clear up the principles behind the EU’s absorption capacity in a report to be submitted to Parliament by 31 December 2006; 
  • Urges authorisation for Parliament’s Foreign Affairs and Constitutional Affairs Committees to tackle the issue of the EU’s absorption capacity in an own-initiative report;
  • Reminds the Council that any further enlargement of the EU must be conditional on the availability of adequate budgetary resources; 
  • Urges an increase for the purse available for the Pre-accession (IPA) and the Neighbourhood and Partnership (ENPI) instruments; 
  • Calls for the drafting of a framework for a “close multilateral relationship with the EU” which all countries with recognised membership prospects should be able to join on their way to full membership.

On Turkey, the report notes that the pace of reforms has slowed down in 2005. It reiterates the expectations and conditions associated with Ankara’s quest for membership of the EU, and says that Turkey should “present as soon as possible a plan including a timetable and specific measures to meet these deadlines." Specifically, in connection with the still outstanding Turkish implementation of the additional protocol to the Ankara Agreement, the report reminds Turkey that "recognition of all member states is a necessary component of the accession process."

On Croatia, the report welcomes the country's "good progress" and "full co-operation" with the international war crimes tribunal in the Hague. The report notes that while Croatia "meets the necessary political criteria" for EU membership, "it faces a number of major challenges" in the fields of judicial reform, fighting corruption and improving the situation of the Roma population.

In its assessment of the situation in the Western Balkans, the report notes that unemployment "is still unacceptably high" in the region, and calls on the Commission to make job creation "one of its priorities in its overall policy concerning the region."

Positions: 

Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn said in his contribution to the debate that the Commission’s “energy is focused on peaceful unification in Southeast Europe.” At the same time, he said that “we have to avoid making enlargement hostage to a theological debate on the final borders of Europe.” While admitting that the pace of the EU’s enlargement “must take into consideration the EU’s absorption capacity,” Rehn said that “it would be utterly irresponsible to disrupt a valuable process that is helping to build stable and effective partners in the most unstable parts of Europe. “For the sake of Europe, let us not shake this foundation,” he concluded. 

MEP Doris Pack of the EPP-ED Group said that "There is no answer yet as to what the boundaries of the EU are. For me, the boundaries of the EU are reached with the accession of Bulgaria, Romania and the Western Balkans. For all other countries there has to be an effective instrument within the neighbourhood policy.” 

According to Green MEPs Angelika Beer and Joost Lagendijk, the fact that the Brok report questions the EU’s absorption capacity and suggests alternatives to full membership “sends a dangerous signal at a time of flux in the region – with ongoing discussions on the future status of Kosovo, Montenegro and the Bosnian constitution.” At the same time, the Green/EFA Group “fully supports the commitments in the report” and calls on all MEPs “not to undermine consensus on the future of enlargement.” 

The Socialist Group’s Vice President, MEP Jan Marius Wiersma of the Netherlands, believes that the “multilateral structure should be open to countries with perspectives of EU membership – but only if they themselves want to take it up as an option and as an intermediate step towards the goal of EU membership at some point.” The Socialists believe that while the EU must remain open to new members, the existing Nice Treaty is an unfit basis for further decisions on EU enlargement. 

Speaking for the ALDE Group, MEP Annemie Neyts of Belgium said that “I don’t view the absorption capacity of the Union as a geographic one. If there is indeed a problem for the Union to absorb new countries, it’s because our institutions need to be reformed.” She emphasised that “it is most important that the EU follows up on its promise of membership, notably in the Western Balkans.” In the opinion of MEP Cecilia Malmstrom of Sweden, “If we fix the European Union’s borders today, we will prematurely limit the spreading of democracy.” 

Advertising