EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Erdogan should resign over Armenia row

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 25 January 2012

Erdogan should have followed a rational and strategic approach regarding the French bill on Armenian genocide. Instead, he acts like a small kid in the sandbox, writes Michael Kambeck from European Friends of Armenia.

Michael Kambeck is Secretary General of the Brussels based NGO European Friends of Armenia. The following was sent exclusively to EurActiv.

"The hysteria in Turkey over the French bill prohibiting the denial of the Armenian Genocide could hardly be more self-damaging or more revealing. Readers of the official Turkish statement of 24 January will be struck by a tone unworthy of a strong and mature nation and rather be reminded of speeches of some of those Arabic leaders, who have recently been ousted by their people.

France is allegedly “damaging the freedom of expression in a tactless manner”, says Turkey, which has just today (25 January 2012) received another condemning report from Reporters Without Borders for its further weakening media freedom, dropping down to place 148 out of 178 (France is on 38, Armenia on 75, Azerbaijan on 162). The French law does the opposite of what the Turkish government claims.It protects freedom.

France has, together with the country I know best, Germany, for many years had such laws against the denial of the Holocaust. This has neither stopped researchers on this issue nor journalistic freedom, even where journalists took views which I personally would find inappropriate. But such laws DO protect against blatant hardliners and their propaganda, who generally practice the politisation that Prime Minister Erdogan so loudly condemns these days.

He accuses Sarkozy of fishing for Armenian votes, while omitting the large number of voters with a Turkish background but a French passport. The Armenian Genocide has long been recognised by France, as by many other European states and the European Parliament.

This has been done in view of overwhelming evidence, while in Turkey archives still remain closed, documents still disappear and journalists writing about 1915, like Hrant Dink, face the opposite of freedom. The new French law simply brings the prosecution in line with the earlier recognition decision. The German Bundestag is allegedly considering a similar move and should do so.

The European ideal of tolerance needs intolerance vis-à-vis intolerance. Genocide is the ultimate intolerance. Free democracies need to be strong in their defence against those who seek to undermine that freedom.

While the law does not mention Turkey and President Sarkozy even sent a conciliatory letter to the Turkish government, Erdogan’s reaction was a whole list of threats, calling the law “an unjust action, which disregards human values and public conscience”… “No one should doubt our Government’s principled approach in this issue” the MFA refers to the announced retaliation measures.

Such words do not sound like the communication of a mature and proud nation, it sounds like a vexed child in a sand box, saying “He started first!”. Turkey kills its relations with France and blames France for it. Instead, Turkey would have had the chance to run a different policy, even a very nationalistic one (which I would deem wrong but at least clever): Turkey could have opened the border with Armenia and with that started a process of debating the issue, which no international player would have liked to interfere with.

Turkey could state, how ever they classify the “events of 1915”, that this was during the Ottoman Empire and hence only indirectly concerns modern Turkey. Turkey could have focussed on its national interests by gaining support from the international community for securing a deal which limits possible Armenian damage claims and embarking on a course of a genuine zero-problem-policy with its neighbours.

Instead, that zero-problem-policy has visibly failed all around and Turkey is today mainly known for being “loud”. It destroyed its interests with the EU and sends enraging and mobilising signals to the Armenian Diaspora around the world and to its own minorities, especially to the Kurds in its poorer East.

All this has a high price for Turkey and all this has been dominated neither by Turkey’s Foreign Minister nor by the President. In the interest of the Turkish nation, you would have to call upon Prime Minister Erdogan to resign.

And as even long-standing friends of Turkey, like MEP and Turkey rapporteur Oomen-Ruijten, become publicly more and more frustrated and critical, France and the EU seem to have little to lose, as long as Mr Erdogan is in power. The only light comes from the Turkish intelligentsia, which means that civil society is today our best hope for saving Turkey’s modernisation."

COMMENTS

  • The difference between the Holocaust and other judgement of history is that some french and german participated in this genocide. I do not get where a comparison could even be started with the Armenian atrocities of 1915, which have been in the last decades renamed genocide (for the obvious territorial ambitions of Armenia).

    It is one thing to not want french people (or german people) to fight in between them about such a sensitive subject as the Holocaust. It is quite another to not want turks and armenians to discuss the topic of the 1915 events (and earlier ones).

    Turkey has definitely its faults in the process mostly due to its politicized justice but it is wrong to say that the Armenian Diaspora does look at helping the reconciliation between Armenia and Turkey.

    By :
    Friends of Friends of Armenia
    - Posted on :
    25/01/2012
  • an article of naive thoughts. with all due respect, on which planet do you live, sir?

    By :
    anonymous
    - Posted on :
    25/01/2012
  • in response to the previous poster who stated "Armenian atrocities of 1915, which have been in the last decades renamed genocide"

    it's shocking how out of touch the turkish propaganda machine is when it comes to facts.

    the word Genocide was coined in 1948 by Rafael Lemkin who studied the Armenian Genocide for the greater part of his life. see address below.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=021ilh609gw

    kudos on an excellent article

    By :
    art408
    - Posted on :
    25/01/2012
  • firstly, learn to chose your friends better: Armenia is a country that has invaded about 20 percent of its neighbor Azerbaijan's land backed by Russian army. This Azerbaijan land is still under control of Armenia. do you know who you make friends with?
    any study that neglects the Armenian atrocities in Russian and French armies against Turks in Eastern Anatolia, that neglects Armenian claims for land in Eastern Anatolia in Ottoman times and Republic times, is incomplete.
    anybody who claims that issues would be solved without external interference if Turkey opens the borders with Armenia, has the knowledge of international politics at the same level as that of that same "child in the sand box".
    Accusing the Turkish side for the unrest in its neighbors, is an overly simplified interpretation of events in the region. It is your beloved French friends who openly try to benefit from unrest in Syria, as one example.
    The interpretation of the passed bill for how it does not involve Turkey at all or how it does not limit free discussion, has nothing to do with the real content of the passed bill.
    This article has no touch with realities and obviously written to attack on Turksih side. It is allowed, no problem there but note what the article is worth.

    By :
    anonymous
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • Excellent article by Michael. Erdogan has damaged Turkish foreign relations more than any other Turkish politician. He should resign.

    By :
    al Se
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • What a series of discussions here says that the issue in France was generated to get Sarkozy re-elected and only that.

    If we continue to look backwards at events that happened almost 100 years ago we would not have had an EU.

    The Armenian Attrocities that took place in this rea and the others in the similar near time are history. Genocide is a relatively new word. No one cares about the issues in Rwanda and Burundi where consideranly more people within living memory of most of the writers here suffered whilst the Western Nations did nothing, And France is not the best representative in the World to not be exempt from Genocide.

    This is a world where we should look to the Future. Turkey is a Bastion of Integrity sitting at the cross-roads between the Eastern and the Western and Nothern and Southern Nations and all it appears is that the Western Nations want to do is break it up for their own good.

    By :
    Victoria
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • As always, Turkey shows its true colors whenever it's past crimes are put under the spotlight.
    After reading some of these comments, here's what I have to say:
    Nagorno Karabakh has always been Armenian and will always be. It was Stalin that handed the area to Azerbaijan (which did not even exist prior to that time). The country of Azerbaijan did not exist, and once belonged to Iran. For Azerbaijan to cry over Karabakh is crazy. It is not surprising for Turkey to stand with its Turkic brothers, the Azeris in this matter. Both countries are continually finding ways to crush Armenia and its Christian population.
    History is clear. I find it funny that the Turkish government continues to use the same tired line "leave history to the historians". But when it comes to looking at what those historians write, they start coming up with excuses.
    Armenians have lived in those areas of current day Armenia, Turkey and Azerbaijan for thousands of years. Turkic people came from Mongolia and took much of the lands that belonged to others (natives like the Greeks, Assyrians, Armenians, Kurds, etc). So if anyone is to return any land, we know who it should be.
    I am not here to prove that the Armenian Genocide happened. It is a well documented fact, and easily researchable for anyone who is outside of Turkey and Azerbaijan.

    What I do want to say is this. Thank you France for doing this. Thank you for helping many Armenians during and after the genocide. You have been one of those countries that has oppened its doors and accepted refugees. I now wait for the U.S. and Israel to follow in France's footsteps. No time is better than now.

    Finally -the Jewish Holocaust and Armenian Genocide are similar. Of course we all know that the holocaust was to a much greater extent. To state that the holocaust was unique (as denialists like Lewis and Lewy have stated) is outright immoral and unethical.

    The term genocide was coined by Raphael Lemkin who, based on his research on the Armenian massacres in the Ottoman Empire, found a word (that is now a legal term) for describing the events.

    By :
    Sylvie
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • To the Azeri commenter,
    Firstly, Armenia did not occupy Karabakh, Karabakh always belonged to Armenia and became part of Azerbaijan with a stroke of a pen.
    Secondly, the territory under Armenian control is not 20% but 14%.
    Thirdly, Azeris were the one who bombed Karabakh people first. Why do you think any Karabakh Armenian would wanto to be part of Azerbaijan when you bombed them 20 years ago? Armenians and Turks cannot live next to each other in one country. History has proved it many times. And Azeris are Turks. As you say you are one nation but two countries.

    By :
    Sella
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • To the anonymous coward stating "Armenia is a country that has invaded about 20 percent of its neighbor" - You forgot the first part: that was after "it's neighbor" invaded and threatened to commit a second genocide... AND more to the point, that was after a terrorist sea of nomads from Central Asia invaded Armenia and today continue to OCCUPY 80% of Armenian territories as a result of their Turkish/Azeri INVENTION OF GENOCIDE!!!!!

    By :
    Jerry W
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • Thank you for the article

    By :
    Haydat
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • lol at the 1st comment "...which have been in the last decades renamed genocide " learn your history. It was never renamed as genocide. The person who invented the word "Genocide" brought the Armenian massacres as a clear example of a genocide.

    And all you azeri tards stop whining about karabakh. It was never yours and it doesn't have anything to do with this article.

    By :
    robert
    - Posted on :
    26/01/2012
  • jerryw so what is your point about cowardness. you want to go to car park for a fist fight or something? obviously that is your level.
    the respondents here do not deny the occupation of karabakh. they just say "it was our land" and we also hear clearly they also want the turkish land.
    armenia is a country that will rotten because of its hostile policies to its neighbors. its only chance is to create an instability by playing the big powers against one another and hope that some carcass is left for itself after the battle is over.
    I hope the author's eyes are opened about what their friends are really like.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    28/01/2012
  • sylvie
    can you give us references for the "well documented genocide".
    I don't ask for such references saying "I researched it and it is genocide". I ask for documents which all these self-acclaimed experts use as basis when they reach to that conclusion.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    28/01/2012
  • sylvie
    how about magyars who came from the steps of central asia, germens who moved to western europe by pushing the local communities to north west of europe, western europeans who invaded the americas and massacred millions of indigenous people, western europeans who did the same in australia, white christians who have been sucking the blood of africa since centuries? I believe there is more to add into this list.
    so what is your analysis about the presence of migrated elements in these regions? how are you going to separate the local elements from the incoming elements?
    the logic you express in your message has no touch with how human history has progressed? if you are indeed a humanitarian not a turkish hater, I wish to see you and your likes doing the job right by looking all migrations around the globe. Otherwise, you are just another person who simply hate Turks.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    28/01/2012
  • this french bill is a thank you from french state to armenia. read below:
    Translation of the Letter, dated 30 November 1919, from Boghos Nubar (Head
    of Armenian National Delegation to Paris Peace Conference,1919) to the
    French Foreign Minister:
    “Dear Minister,
    I have the honor, in the name of the Armenian National Delegation, of submitting
    to Your Excellency the following declaration, at the same time reminding that:
    The Armenians have been, since the beginning of the war, de facto
    belligerents, as you yourself have acknowledged, since they have fought
    alongside the Allies on all fronts, enduring heavy sacrifices and great suffering
    for the sake of their unshakable attachment to the cause of the Entente:
    In France, through their volunteers, who started joining the Foreign
    Legion in the first days and covered themselves with glory under the
    French flag;
    In Palestine and Syria, where Armenian volunteers, recruited by the
    National Delegation at the request of the government of the Republic itself,
    made up more than half of the French contingent and played a large role
    in the victory of General Allenby, as himself and his French chiefs have
    officially declared;
    In the Caucasus, where, without mentioning the 150,000 Armenians in
    the Imperial Russian Army, more than 40,000 of their volunteers
    contributed to the liberation of a portion of the Armenian vilayets, and
    where, under the command of their leaders, Antranik and Nazarbekoff,
    they alone among the peoples of the Caucasus, offered resistance to the
    Turkish armies, from the beginning of the Bolshevist withdrawal right up
    to the signing of the armistice.”

    By :
    anonymous
    - Posted on :
    29/01/2012
  • by the comments here we have learnt of a 2nd armenian genocide that almost happened. probably armenian nation is an exception with 2 (one is an almost genocide) genocides in their history. in the 2nd one, we learnt that it was self defence to massacre azeri civilians and cause about a million azeri refugees.
    armenian state should stop blaming others for their sins, and armenian nation should learn to admit the mistakes they have done in the past. that is the only way to have peace with one's self and with neighbors.

    By :
    anonymous
    - Posted on :
    29/01/2012
  • Turkey will NEVER be allowed in the EU until there is recognition!!! What is it about this simple fact that the Turks don't understand! Stand up and face the truth...finally!!!

    By :
    James Bloom
    - Posted on :
    18/02/2012

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising