EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Kosovo, Serbia advised to seek compromise

Published 30 August 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

Serbia and Kosovo have no option but to hold frank talks without outside involvement and reach a compromise agreement if they are to progress on their paths to European integration, concludes a report by the International Crisis Group (ICG), an NGO advising governments on conflict resolution, published on 26 August.

A more realistic public attitude is considered as key to achieving a mutally satisfactory resolution of the 10-year dispute, the report says.

Serbia keeps repeating that it will never recognise Kosovo's "unilateral declaration of independence" in 2008. According to the ICG, however, the country should not bury its head in the sand and must secure closer relations with Pristina in order to support the rule of law in northern Kosovo, where a significant Serbian minority lives.

Neglecting to act in the face of such opportunity would risk freezing the conflict "for several years," according to Marko Prelec, director of the ICG's Balkans Project, who warns that the dispute would then be likely be used to "mobilise nationalist opinion and deflect criticism of domestic corruption and government failures".

Mutual suspicion and incompatible agendas were identified as the biggest stumbling blocks to the two sides deepening relations.

Serbia has tabled a request to become a candidate for EU membership and is expected to have to stop preventing Kosovo's participation in regional institutions if it is to be considered for accession. Last Thursday, German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in Belgrade that its road to EU membership passes through reconciliation with Kosovo.

The same idea is developed in the ICG report. "If Serbia really seeks meaningful progress, it will have to put its cards on the table and treat Kosovo as an equal; and Pristina should carefully consider what Belgrade has to offer," Prelec states.

One of the most controversial proposals discussed in the report is the possibility of a land swap between ethnic Serb Northern Kosovo and the Albanian portion of the Preševo Valley in Serbia, an idea supported by the ICG, despite not being on the agenda of the EU's capitals or institutions.

Greater autonomy for the north and self-governing status for Serbian Orthodox Church sites, as set out in the Ahtisaari plan, in exchange for Serbia recognising Kosovo, "should be acceptable to both sides," according to the ICG.

Sabine Freizer, director of the ICG's Europe Programme, believes that a solution to the Belgrade-Pristina deadlock is most likely to come without foreign direct mediation.

"The best policy for Kosovo's friends is to facilitate an opportunity for the sides to engage in a frank and open dialogue without coercion and without agendas imposed or limited from outside," the report concludes.

According to the ICG, nothing short of Serbia's consent to Kosovo's independence, through some form of diplomatic relations and eventually full and formal recognition, is likely to sway other EU or UN Security Council members who remain opposed, notably Spain, Greece, Russia and China.

Background: 

Kosovo, the smallest Balkan nation, seceded from Serbia in 2008, nine years after the end of a 1998-1999 war between Belgrade's security forces and ethnic Albanian guerrillas. In the following years, Kosovo was an international protectorate patrolled by NATO peacekeepers. 

After Kosovo declared independence on 17 February 2008, the two million-strong republic, 90% of whose population is ethnic Albanian, established many of the trappings of statehood including a new constitution, army, national anthem, flag, passports, identity cards and an intelligence agency. 

More than 60 countries have recognised Kosovo, including the US and most EU member states except Spain, Cyprus, Greece, Romania and Slovakia. Serbia, backed by Russia, is staunchly opposed to Kosovo's independence. 

At the request of Serbia, on 1 December 2009, the International Court of Justice began to examine the legality of Kosovo's declaration of independence and on 22 July ruled that it did not violate international law by a majority of 10 to four (EurActiv 23/07/10).

Despite member states' differences regarding Kosovo's status, the European institutions stress that it is vital for the EU to engage with Kosovo so that stability and security in the Western Balkans – the EU's immediate neighbourhood – can be preserved and no 'black holes' remain on the European map.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising