EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Parliament report puts EU-Turkey relations to the test

Published 28 September 2006 - Updated 05 January 2007
Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

The Parliament has voted on a report that puts Turkey under pressure to reform further. Nevertheless, a controversial clause on Armenian genocide recognition was dropped.

The report was supported by a majority of 429 to 71 against with 125 abstentions. A controversial clause, making recognition of the Armenian genocide a “precondition” to Turkey’s EU accession, was amended. 

Rapporteur Camiel Eurlings of the Christian Democrats (EPP-ED) said the report was “tough but fair”. The report points out the main stumbling blocks in the way of Turkey’s accession to the EU. These are mainly reforms in the area of freedom of religion and freedom of expression, especially the notorious article 301, which has served as a basis for so-called “Turkishness”-cases against writers and journalists. Another concern is the opening of Turkish ports and airports to vessels from Cyprus. 

Positions: 

The Finnish presidency noted that there has been much achieved, but insisted that more “tangible results were needed”. Minister for European Affairs Paula Lehtomäki said that Turkey needs to give new impetus to the pace of the political reform and vigorously pursue the reform process. Full and effective implementation of the reforms is of utmost importance for Turkey to ensure the irreversibility and sustainability of the changes.

Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn also regretted the “lack of progress in reforms”. He underlined that negotiations were "an open process" with no automatic guarantees. "The integration of Turkey would be of mutual benefit," he said, adding "the EU needs a prosperous and stable Turkey".

Rapporteur Camiel Eurlings (EPP-ED) said its basic conclusion was that the EP regretted the "slowdown in reforms" in Turkey, although he did compliment the Turkish government on its 9th reform package.

Christian Democrat MEP Elmar Brok (EPP-ED) stressed the issues of human rights, minority rights, freedom of religion and of expression. These, he said, were "preconditions" for EU membership. So far it had not even implemented the Ankara Protocol. He also emphasised that the financial aspects of the negotiations must be dealt with and that the EU had "no financial leeway" under the Financial Perspective.

Liberal Andrew Duff (ALDE) stressed that EP's role was "to promote parliamentary democracy in Turkey". This meant encouraging Turkey's modernisation not putting up "spurious blocks" to the process. If there were a "train crash" in Cyprus, there would be two trains involved: one carrying "Turkey's efforts to create a viable reform of European Islam, where the prophet meets the Enlightenment", the other carrying Europe's efforts to develop a strong common foreign and defence policy, to which Turkey could make "an extraordinary contribution".

Joost Lagendijk (Greens) said there was a big problem with the paragraphs in which, following amendments instigated by lobby groups, recognition of the Armenian genocide by Turkey was described as a precondition for Turkey to join. He said the parliament must "support people in Turkey who are fighting for the same things as us".

The Turkish ARI Movement warned that this development could weaken Turkish enthusiasm and ambitions in the reform process. 

Next steps: 

The Commission’s progress report on Turkey has been postponed and is due on 8 November 2006.

Background: 

Accession negotiations with Turkey were officially opened in October 2005. In this process, the European Parliament’s opinion on Turkey’s progress on preparing for membership is of considerable importance. Even though the Parliament has so far not used its veto, it must give its agreement to any new Union member.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising