EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Serbians react to EU candidacy with cool approval

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 March 2012

The Serbian public has received mostly approvingly, but without much euphoria, the long-anticipated news of the country achieving EU candidate status. Beta, EurActiv's partner agency in Serbia, reports.

The dispassionate tone was also given by Serbian President Boris Tadić – usually prone to optimistic statements – who pointed out that while this is a great achievement, it is not "epochal".

"It will be epochal once Serbia crosses the enchanted border and joins the EU with the possibility of using all potentials and funds," Tadić told a news conference on 2 March, the day EU leaders meeting in Brussels approved candidate status.

The explanation for the somewhat tempered reaction of the Serbian public may also be because the decision on candidacy was delayed in September. Serbians had expected their country to be quickly rewarded after the extradition to The Hague of accused war criminals, particularly former Bosnian Serb army commander Ratko Mladić.

Officials had announced the certainty of candidate status and also hinted that the decision on starting accession talks was probable. However, last summer's tensions in Kosovo (see background) tempered those hopes.

Brussels to make more demands

Another reason for the somewhat tepid reaction is awareness of the fact that Serbia, as it progresses towards the EU, will be given increasingly difficult tasks by Brussels. The European Commission, in its October opinion on Serbia, set defined objectives regarding the improvement of relations with Kosovo.

The priorities are the solving of problems in the telecommunication and energy sectors, as well as the implementation of agreements concerning regional cooperation and everyday life.

Serbia now faces a long road to membership, and must meet conditions for negotiations, harmonise regulations and consistently implement reforms during the talks, which will take years. As the condition for setting a date for the beginning of the talks depends on relations with Kosovo, ups and downs are anticipated.

Romania's short-lived, last-minute opposition to Serbia's candidacy, which it used to push for guarantees for the ethnic Romanian minority in Serbia, also made a portion of the Serbian wonder what other unexpected obstacles might spring up.

EU's role in Serb elections

This year, presidential, general and local elections will be held in Serbia. The European Union, as Serbia's most important official strategic goal, is playing a major role in the campaigns, although at this time of crisis its significance has diminished to an extent.

Political analysts do not believe the decision to grant candidacy will significantly boost the ruling Democratic Party's popularity. However, had the status not been granted, it would likely have had a negative impact.

Government authorities had mostly been pro-European since 2000, while the main opposition party was the nationalist Serbian Radical Party, led by Hague tribunal indictee Vojislav Seselj.

Since the previous election in 2008, the pro-European mood has grown among the political class. A portion of the Serbian Radical Party, including leaders Tomislav Nikolić and Aleksandar Vučić, founded a new Serbian Progressive Party, which is officially pro-European. According to polls, it enjoys greater support than the ruling Democratic Party.

The decision on Serbia's candidacy was predictably received negatively by nationalist parties. The Radical Party in particular regretted the fact that if Serbia were to join the EU, it would have to abandon its free trade agreement with Russia.

Recently, Ivica Dačić, interior minister and leader of the Socialist Party of Serbia, a coalition partner in the government, said that if the EU turns down Serbia's bid, the country should turn to Russia as a strategic partner.

EurActiv.com, based on reporting by Beta

COMMENTS

  • From my point of view Serbia should think if joining to EU is worth of time, money and bureaucracy it demands. Visa arrangements, free trade and some EU programs are possible also for non-members. However I think that at this moment it would be good idea to continue EU process but not because of fulfilling EU needs. The motivation should be the needs of the beneficiaries aka Serbs not EU elite in Brussels. Also from my point of view Serbia should not put all eggs in the same basket; economical cooperation with Russia and other BRIC countries can create real development on the ground instead slow development on the EU’s negotiation tables.

    More e.g. in my post Serbia’s EU association is not a Must
    http://arirusila.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/serbias-eu-association-is-not-a-must/

    By :
    Ari Rusila
    - Posted on :
    08/03/2012
  • EU's popularity among the citizens of Serbia are now worn away while on the other hand, traditionally, Serbia's citizens feel closer to Russia. If this (recognition of Kosovo's independence) is a requirement of the European Union, Serbia must decide whether it wants to or not. complete discussion

    By :
    T. Januar. W
    - Posted on :
    11/03/2012
Background: 

The European Commission recommended that Serbia receive EU candidate status in October 2011. It also proposed beginning negotiations when relations between Belgrade and Pristina, capital of the breakaway state of Kosovo, improve.

Kosovo, which is predominantly populated by ethnic Albanians, declared independence in 2008. Its independence is not recognised by Serbia and several EU states, including Spain and Romania.

Some EU countries are demanding the abolition of Serb institutions in northern Kosovo, which is inhabited by an ethnic Serb majority. This is a highly delicate political issue in Serbia.

Kosovo entered the spotlight as a condition for EU accession last summer, when a conflict broke out between Belgrade and Pristina over trade. There have been violent clashes between Serbian and Kosovar forces, with injuries on both sides and among NATO peacekeepers.

Of the former Yugoslav countries, Slovenia is an EU member and Croatia will join the Union mid-2013. Montenegro and Macedonia are official candidates but the latter has been unable to begin negotiations due to a name dispute with Greece. Bosnia and Herzegovina will reportedly officially apply for EU membership in June.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted 4

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising