EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Slovenia, Croatia agree arbiters for border dispute

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 18 January 2012

Croatia and Slovenia agreed yesterday (January 17) on the appointment of judges to arbitrate their border dispute, easing the way for Croatia's accession to the European Union.

"It is very encouraging that we managed to reach an agreement so quickly on such a delicate issue," Croatian Prime Minister Zoran Milanović said, the Croatian news agency Hina reported.

The European Commission had sent Croatia and Slovenia a list of potential arbiters to choose from, with appointment to be determined by mutual agreement. The three judges agreed upon are Gilbert Guillaume of France and Bruno Simma of Germany, who have both served at the International Court of Justice, and Vaughan Lowe of Britain, a professor of international law at Oxford University.

The arbitration court is made up of the three judges suggested by the EU and one judge each from Croatia and Slovenia who must still be appointed. Croatia has put forward the name of Budislav Vukas and Slovenia that of Jernej Sekolec.

Relations warmed, accession on track

Croatia, an EU member hopeful, had its accession treaty signed at the  European Council summit in December. The Croatian government has every interest in ending the dispute as all EU members, including Slovenia, must ratify the treaty for before Croatia can join.

When asked if the arbiters agreement had removed the obstacle to ratification of the accession treaty, Milanović said there had been possibility in the first place of it being rejected.

Slovenian Prime Minister Borut Pahor praised the agreement, saying: "This is a great success of all those who took part in the peaceful resolution of the Slovenian-Croatian border dispute. I am highly optimistic about the work of the arbitral tribunal."

European Commissioner for Enlargement Štefan Füle, who first brokered the deal to establish the arbitration court, praised the agreement on the judges.

"This common agreement is a very welcome signal for the positive development of the good neighbourly relations between the two countries, as well as for the Western Balkans region showing that even difficult issues can be best solved by means of dialogue and cooperation," he said in a statement.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Slovenia is claiming the part of the Adriatic Sea, which the successors to the former Yugoslavia have still not divided, and to stop oil company INA's concession to drill for oil and gas in the Adriatic. The sea is not and cannot be the subject of succession because it belongs to the land and depends on the land which Croatia succeeded as one of the successors to the ex-Yugoslavia.

    Europe EU support continue for the Titoist-style Communists cronyism and rampant corruption that is stunting the Croatia's development is paying off. Hunger for Croatia's Adriatic coast and land is not fair. But Slovenia now a part of the EU gang, is not the only country, EU's land grab crime is lower then we as a free people can prosses. The EU warned Croatia, no its bully' Titoist-style leaders in Croatia for Adriatic coast and fishing in Croatia's waters. Slovene and EU fishermen like to be able to go about their business unhindered in Croatian waters. What is sad about all this, is the fact that Italy and Slovenia, now a part of the EU gang, disallow Croatia from fishing in their waters, yet they create a storm if Croatia wishes to place the same regulations on their own waters. This is an example of a richer country taking from a poorer country's resources. If this poorer country says anything, then the richer country calls his gang (the EU countries) and they try to intimidate Croatia into giving in. This is just one of many examples.

    And the EU wonders why there is a growing anti-EU feel in Croatia. It seems that the Croats will endure this insult, in the name of peaceful reintegration.

    By :
    mario
    - Posted on :
    18/01/2012
  • Slovenia is claiming the part of the Adriatic Sea, which the successors to the former Yugoslavia have still not divided, and to stop oil company INA's concession to drill for oil and gas in the Adriatic. The sea is not and cannot be the subject of succession because it belongs to the land and depends on the land which Croatia succeeded as one of the successors to the ex-Yugoslavia.

    Europe EU support continue for the Titoist-style Communists cronyism and rampant corruption that is stunting the Croatia's development is paying off. Hunger for Croatia's Adriatic coast and land is not fair. But Slovenia now a part of the EU gang, is not the only country, EU's land grab crime is lower then we as a free people can prosses. The EU warned Croatia, no its bully' Titoist-style leaders in Croatia for Adriatic coast and fishing in Croatia's waters. Slovene and EU fishermen like to be able to go about their business unhindered in Croatian waters. What is sad about all this, is the fact that Italy and Slovenia, now a part of the EU gang, disallow Croatia from fishing in their waters, yet they create a storm if Croatia wishes to place the same regulations on their own waters. This is an example of a richer country taking from a poorer country's resources. If this poorer country says anything, then the richer country calls his gang (the EU countries) and they try to intimidate Croatia into giving in. This is just one of many examples.

    And the EU wonders why there is a growing anti-EU feel in Croatia. It seems that the Croats will endure this insult, in the name of peaceful reintegration.

    By :
    mario
    - Posted on :
    18/01/2012
  • White people?! SERIOUSLY!!!

    By :
    Irateblackguy
    - Posted on :
    19/01/2012
Background: 

The border dispute between Slovenia and Croatia concerns small pockets of land along the Adriatic coast that could prove important if accompanied by exclusive rights to deep-sea zones.

Unlike EU member Slovenia, EU applicant Croatia has a long coastline. Slovenia invoked this to assert its rights as a "geographically disadvantaged state".

In 2010 the two countries agreed on international arbitration to help solve the dispute, which lifted obstacles for Croatia's EU membership bid. The arbitration panel's ruling would be binding for both countries.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

Video General News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Video General Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising