MEPs back jail sentences for fraudulent bankers
Financial market fraudsters across the EU could face imprisonment from next year under new EU-wide banking rules voted by MEPs in the European Parliament's economic and monetary affairs committee yesterday (October 9).
Lawmakers approved the proposal to revise an EU directive and regulation on market abuse designed to restore confidence in the financial markets and boost investor protection.
Backing a European Commission proposal tabled in July, the MEPs said market abuse such as insider dealing and market manipulation should be punished by prison sentences.
The text is now being submitted to the full European Parliament for a plenary vote tentatively scheduled for January 2013.
"The EU cannot be seen to be the soft option or a safe haven for perpetrators of market abuse. That is why for the first time we are introducing EU-wide criminal sanctions," said Arlene McCarthy from the Socialists and Democrats group, responsible for steering the legislation through Parliament.
"The Libor scandal has demonstrated that the culture in the financial sector has not changed and that they cannot be trusted to self-regulate," she added.
McCarthy said that the real lesson to be learnt from the crisis is the need to focus on putting in place rules and sanctions to prevent crises, and not reacting after the banks have yet again undermined people’s confidence and trust in the markets.
Same criminal sanctions in member states needed
The new rules, however, have to be backed by tougher criminal sanctions, including prison terms, throughout the EU.
Currently, there are big differences between definitions of offences and the penalties applied for them in different member states. This means that market abuse can easily be carried out across borders and fraudsters can operate where the penalties are the most lenient.
To iron out the differences between EU countries, MEPs want to oblige all member states to ensure that maximum prison sentences for the most serious forms of insider dealing or market manipulation are at least five years throughout the EU.
At present, the maximum prison sentences for insider dealing vary from 30 days in Estonia to 12 years in Italy and Slovakia.
At the same time, the maximum jail terms for market manipulation range from 30 days in Estonia to 15 years in Slovakia.
The economic and monetary committee backed maximum prison sentences of at least two years for other types of market abuse. To ensure that they act as a deterrent, the MEPs want the sanctions to be made public and the fraudsters named unless such disclosures would jeopardise ongoing investigations.
The MEPs also want insider dealing and market manipulation to be punishable regardless of whether they were intended or reckless, attempted or committed.
Europeans want scofflaws behind bars
Ahead of the vote in the Parliament, the global campaign group Avaaz released a poll showing that 90% of the people in France and 89% in Germany and Britain believe that bankers responsible for fraud or manipulating markets should face criminal sanctions such as prison time.
Avaaz additionally handed in a petition to McCarthy, signed by over 720,000 people, calling for such sanctions.
Alex Wilks, campaign director at Avaaz, said the MEPs vote was a crucial step in the EU clamp down on abusive bankers.
"MEPs have faced down the corporate lobbyists and listened to their constituents. Over 700,000 citizens have asked for this reform and 90% of European polled want it," Wilks said.
"We'll now maintain the pressure on EU leaders to adopt the criminal sanctions without diluting them," the campaign director continued.
The poll by Avaaz also showed that a large majority in Germany (60%), France (56%) and the UK (70%) think that guilty bankers should be sent to prison rather than the banks themselves pay fines.
Most people in the UK (64%) and Germany (67%) also think that their government mainly listens to big banks when considering laws and regulations on banking.
In a ranking of the five biggest banks for each country, the ones blamed for the worst abuses of the financial system are Barclays and RBS in Britain, Société Générale in France and Deutsche Bank in Germany.
In response to the Libor rate-rigging scandal, the European Commission promised to revamp the EU's market abuse directive and regulation within weeks.
The EU exectuive outlined proposals in July to criminally sanction traders and others involved in rigging an index such as Libor.
German MEP Wolf Klinz from the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) said: "Recent events have shown that the current legislation on insider dealing and market manipulation urgently needed a review. We need to keep pace with market and technological developments and ensure that new markets, platforms and instruments are all covered."
"Markets have become more integrated and we have observed an increasing tendency of cross-border market abuse, which has a serious impact not only on market confidence but also on financial stability and the real economy. Market integrity needs to be guaranteed. That's why we proposed to establish functioning cross border surveillance mechanisms to detect market manipulation taking place across several venues," Klinz added.
The Greens also welcomed the vote, which would introduce tougher sanctions and other measures. The Green finance spokesperson MEP Sven Giegold stated:
"The recent Libor interest rate rigging scandal has underlined the need to tighten rules to prevent such manipulation in financial markets and the EP has today risen to this challenge. The tougher criminal and administrative sanctions supported by MEPs, which are based on a broader assessment of the damage caused, would act as compelling deterrents against these unethical financial practices."
MEP Jean-Paul Besset, also member of the Green group, added: "If sanctions are to be truly effective as a prophylactic, it is important that attempts at manipulation are subject to sanctions regardless of whether or not they have been successfully carried out. The supervisors' hands cannot be tied by overly restrictive definitions of market abuse. The EP economic affairs committee has resoundingly endorsed this."
"MEPs also voted for stronger whistle-blowing provisions coupled with safeguards to protect the legitimate investigations of journalists, restrictions on management trading in company shares, and better cooperation across markets, which represent a welcome toughening of the stance on market abuse," Besset said.
- Jan. 2013: Vote scheduled in Parliament plenary.