EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Britain on a collision course over EU bank bonus plan

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 March 2013, updated 07 March 2013

Finance Minister George Osborne will have a first chance to challenge plans in Brussels to cap bankers' bonuses at a meeting today (5 March), but he is unlikely to find enough support from fellow EU ministers to block a measure popular with voters.

 

EU diplomats and the European Parliament agreed new rules last week that would prevent bankers from receiving bonuses bigger than their base salaries from next year. The bonus cap can rise to twice the size of the salary if shareholders agree.

Britain's powerful financial sector professionals fear the rules will put London at a disadvantage and provoke an exodus of major banks and staff to rival financial centres.

Osborne has argued against the limits and will repeat those objections at an EU ministers' meeting in Brussels. Few other countries, however, support his position, officials familiar with the discussions say, and since the measures only require a weighted majority of member states to become law, Britain has no veto.

An inability to fend off the reform, the first of its kind globally, also underscores Britain's waning influence in the EU and plays to a growing eurosceptic complaint that Brussels has too much say on domestic policy.

Late on Monday, France's finance minister Pierre Moscovici said the deal would not be renegotiated.

"Everyone must live with what is on the table," he told reporters after a meeting of eurozone finance ministers in Brussels. "I told George Osborne, when I was in London, these moral rules apply to everyone, even the City."

A spokesman for Prime Minister David Cameron had earlier said the British government had "real concerns" about the bonus cap plans and that it was discussing the situation with other member states. London Mayor Boris Johnson has dubbed the policy "moronic".

Perhaps the best that Osborne can hope for is that if other parts of the wider bank capital agreement are challenged, he could push back for a softening of pay curbs.

Lonely fight 

Britain could try to push to change the scope of the rules, which will apply to all EU bank staff globally regardless of where they are based, or propose extra flexibility on how bonuses are calculated.

British members of the European Parliament indicated that they had done as much as they could to accommodate Britain, with concessions such as allowing it flexibility on other elements of the new banking rules, which also cover capital requirements.

"The UK has got all of its other issues delivered on, such as flexibility to apply the retail ring fence for banks and many other issues to help the wider economy," Vicky Ford, a British MEP who played a role in negotiations, told Reuters. "But we can't have everything."

Ford said the bonus rules had already been changed significantly during negotiations.

The new rules will not apply to the majority of bank staff, who on average earn bonuses of up to 30% of salary, but target senior management and so-called "risk takers", such as traders, whose bonuses can be many times their base salary.

Analysts estimate the law will initially affect around 300 to 500 people in each large bank, or around 5,000 people in London all told.

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • "Analysts estimate the law will initially affect around 300 to 500 people in each large bank, or around 5,000 people in London all told"

    I have some sympathy for Gidiot and the Tory-Vermin party. After all it must be irritating to see sources of party finance (the 5000 mentioned above) having their income reduced since this will lead to lees money for said Vermin party - and we cann't have that can we?

    Tell me Gidiot - how is the triple dip recession going?

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • It's frightening that an almost total majority of countries (maybe not Czech & Sweden) can unilaterally decide to pass rules, which could severely damage a major industry of another EU state. It hardly promotes the benefits of EU membership with the UK paying a particularly high price for club membership.

    It's not a lot different to the EU passing a law for a massive tax on cars with large engines on the basis they cause more pollution with Germany being the main victim in this instance (and to a lesser extent the UK).

    This regulation looks more vindictive than reasonable. The fact is bankers' total remuneration is going to fall anyway due to tougher rules on bank capital, an obligation to hold more of it and of better quality (Basel III). There are rules in place to pay bankers' bonuses over a period of years with claw-back provisions if the deals they worked on subsequently blow up etc....

    The golden days of the City are over as is high risk, high leverage 'casino' type banking.

    The issue is not over the total size of bankers' remuneration, but over whether their activities create undue risks to the rest of the economy and that's what the focus should be.

    If a banker, an engineer, a scientist or an entrepreneur is smart enough to invent something or come up with a new process that is good for their customers, then why shouldn't they be rewarded for it? Surely that would be a much better to look at regulation rather then petty vindictive behaviour.

    By :
    Justin Pugsley, Principal, JJPAssociates
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • Mr Pugsley, where in Basel III does it talk about banksters remuneration? Finance is not "an industry" it is, in its present form parasitical and deforms the UK economy (such as it ain't).

    Your comparison between bankster and large cars is a good one - a motor vehicle is a useful tool - which over time has been deformed into a status symbol - contributing greatly to CO2 emissions. Neither (banksters or cars as status symbols) contributes anything to society.

    Furthermore, the finance sector focuses on fossil fuel investments & thus positions itself as part of the climate change problem - when it could be part of the solution.

    Finance needs much much tougher regulation. I suggest you inform yourself with respect to what happened and why & what needs to be done in the future - a good start would be "After the Great Complacence" you would then see that lack of regulation (and bonsues) are key elements with respect to what happened - pointing to what needs to be done.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • Ha Ha Now the Cityboys are F..ked in London too!
    Well Done !

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • Hi Mike, I loved your post! Really, it made me laugh. I guess Cambodia, Cuba and North Korea are all attractive alternatives as they have hardly any bankers or large status symbol cars and in the first two they even have better weather as well.

    You misunderstood the link I was making between Basel III & banker remuneration. Tougher capital rules means less scope for using high leverage. In fact many activities in investment banks are already becoming unprofitable as a result, which means smaller remuneration.

    The issue is not how much bankers earn, it's whether it involves unacceptable risks to the rest of society, period! Trying to regulate how much they earn is just a pointless exercise, instead focus on the risk aspects and focus the rules there.

    If a banker came up with a great of financing idea for green power would you object to them making a fortune in the process? (Actually don't bother answering, I already know your answer).

    By :
    Justin Pugsley, Principal, JJPAssociates
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • "Tell me Gidiot - how is the triple dip recession going?"

    Ask Gordon Brown - the seeds of this were sown on his watch

    By :
    Edward99
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • It is fascinating that leaders in the current British government are in EU meetings fighting to secure larger bonuses for bankers. A note of thanks to them for clearing up who butters their bread.

    By :
    Earl Bell
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • The very same persons that one day fight for slashing public servants salaries of 60keuro, the other day consider millionaire bonuses as fundamental for the entire world economy...
    Simply disgusting

    By :
    Ema
    - Posted on :
    05/03/2013
  • i find it astonishing and difficult to understand why everybody keeps forgetting about the sociological reasons for those "high performers" reaching and handling these positions they cling on to. as they caused the financial crisis, wouldn´t it be a good idea to say, alright leave to places where they may honor your failure and we´ll let somebody less imbecile give it a try...

    By :
    alex
    - Posted on :
    06/03/2013
  • @ Justin Pugsley,

    Excellent Posts!

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    06/03/2013
  • @ an european

    Ha Ha Now the Cityboys are F..ked in London too!
    Well Done !

    Congratulations on managing to master English swear words while consistently speaking Sh1te English!

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    06/03/2013
  • Mr George Mc - yes always easier to go for the man than the issue/argument or for that matter (& in the case of Mr Pugsley) to do a bit of whataboutery

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    06/03/2013
  • Merkel has decided that she absolutely wants to keep the UK in the EU so that she needs to absolutely give in to any blackmail coming from London, the more outrageous the better. Germany will thus water down the bonus cap and delay approval until the elections, or until opinion polls are analyzed indicating what potential Merkel voters or donors think of these caps.

    By :
    Charles
    - Posted on :
    06/03/2013
  • As the finance sector accounts for 40% of the EU market it has been said that tucked away somewhere (I heard Luxembourg mentioned, I think) is a clause which will allow the UK to object on the basis of how much it is in the UK national interest.

    I have also read that this may be challenged at the EU Court of Justice as earnings are outside the EU remit. This may well run for a bit yet.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    07/03/2013
  • @George Mc - Posted on : 06/03/2013

    See Youtube : "Some" British Interests are full of Insults !

    You said to me :
    "Congratulations on managing to master English swear words while consistently speaking Sh1te English!"

    It seems merely to be the reverse !

    Sorry for offending!

    Do you want any example of british insults ?
    Then let me know !

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    07/03/2013
  • Keine Ahnung wie viele Sprachen diese GEORGE MC kann aber so stoltz sein dass er seine eigene Muttersprache kann, ist schon sehr dorf oder?

    Il est completement à coté de la plaque ce GEORGE MC à faire des cours d'anglais en moquant la langue de ceux qui, contrairement à lui, ne l'ont pas appris comme langue maternelle.

    ¡ Una lengua es útil para pensar, no para se enorgueillirde ello hablar, sobre todo si es una lengua maternal!

    By :
    uk-skeptic
    - Posted on :
    17/03/2013
UK Finance Minister George Osborne
Background: 

Brussels agreed landmark rules capping bank bonuses after an agreement between MEPs and governments struck on 28 February.

The deal, which also increases the amount of capital banks must keep on their balance sheets, will cap bonus payments at the same level as the year's salary – but with the provision that the bonus could be doubled subject to majority shareholder approval.

The highly complex legislation - which is composed of a directive and a regulation - may yet be tweaked and it will need to be approved by EU governments before coming into force next year. Certain countries – such as Britain – oppose the move but cannot veto it.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Euro & Finance News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Euro & Finance Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising