EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Commission calls for 'third industrial revolution'

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 09 May 2012, updated 15 June 2012

Following  the election of French socialist President François Hollande, the European Commission has tacked firmly towards the growth agenda and called for a new industrial revolution for Europe.

After an anti-austerity backlash by voters in Greece and France on Sunday (6 May), European Council President Herman Van Rompuy called yesterday (8 May) an informal summit of EU leaders for May 23 to discuss the growth agenda.

The informal dinner on May 23 will lay the ground for another meeting on June 28-29 when leaders are to take formal decisions on their growth and budget consolidation strategy.

After an anti-austerity backlash by voters in Greece and France on Sunday (6 May), European Council President Herman Van Rompuy called yesterday (8 May) an informal summit of EU leaders for May 23 to discuss the growth agenda.

The informal dinner on May 23 will lay the ground for another meeting on June 28-29 when leaders are to take formal decisions on their growth and budget consolidation strategy.

"The debate of consolidation versus growth is a false debate," EU Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner Olli Rehn told a news briefing. "In the current economic situation of low growth and high debt there is no choice - we need to pursue both simultaneously."

Commission paper will be discussed at informal summit

Commission President José Manuel Barroso said that each of the member states would bring their own plans for growth to the informal meeting, but also pledged that the Commission would prepare an over-arching paper on the issue for discussion at the meeting.

The precise room for manoeuvre in any growth plan is uncertain. The Commission is proposing to boost the capital of the European Investment Bank - which finances infrastructure projects in Europe - by €10 billion. This would increase the EIB's lending capacity by €60 billion and have a total investment impact, together with private financing it would attract, of €180 billion, according to Commission calculations.

Revolution following steam power and carbon

The Commission also wants to front-load spending on infrastructure in the European Union's budget and to use project bonds - EU debt issued to finance specific projects.

Neither of the plans is new, but they have been given fresh momentum by the victory in presidential elections in France of Socialist FrançoisHollande, who campaigned to shift focus from austerity to growth.

Meanwhile, singing from the same hymn sheet, Industry and Entrepreneurship Commissioner Antonio Tajani, told a committee in the European Parliament yesterday that austerity was not enough, saying he would guide Europe towards a ‘third industrial revolution’. Tajani said that following the industrial revolutions stimulated by steam power and carbon, a new push was required.

A conference in Brussels on industrial policy will be staged by the Commissioner on 29 May, which will form the basis of a re-launch of Europe’s industrial policy, Tajani told members of the Industry and Research Committee of the Parliament. He said that the automobile sector, raw materials and space sectors would be key to this new push.

Next steps: 
  • 23rd May: Informal dinner and summit to discuss growth
  • 29th May: Conference on industrial policy in Europe
  • 28th-29th June: Summit of Heads of state and government in Brussels
EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • Lieber Thomas, hat man Rifkin und uns erhört ???
    beste Grüsse

    By :
    jiri burianek
    - Posted on :
    09/05/2012
  • Lieber Thomas, hat man Rifkin und uns erhört???
    Beste Grüsse

    Jiri

    By :
    jiri burianek
    - Posted on :
    09/05/2012
  • More than an industrial revolution I would rather talk of a Renaissance where knowledge played a much higher role that technology.
    Europe can lead the world in developing sustainable societies and technologies is in the transition towards a carbon-poor development model.
    Smart grids, local and renewable energy production, "blue growth" more than "green growth" can allow Europe to grow in intensity whilst not consuming resources it doesn't have.
    And rather sooner than later other continents will need the knowledge, technologies and practices Europe will have developed.

    By :
    Giorgio Clarotti
    - Posted on :
    09/05/2012
  • A Third "Industrial" Revolution???!! We're living in the 21st Century and are reaping the results of the second industrial revolution this very moment. Not pretty. Why on earth would you want to repeat an era that not only has run its' course, but brought the world to its' knees? We need a revolution, absolutely. But one that respects life; and the environment and ecosystems that we have destroyed in our rush for "bigger, faster, more" taking and taking from the earth for profits, without restoring as we go.
    Time to get real. We have to face the facts that the days gone by are gone. We need need to build a completely new paradigm for life with a different set of values and principles that serves all of life, without destroying that which we humans (and all life) depend on for survival...our natural world...which should be first and foremost in all decision-making for the future...lest we forget the mess we/re in as a result of our forgetfulness. If the entire globe were to focus on restoring our environment and ecosystems to health we would automatically create a new kind of economy, plenty of new jobs and a common purpose for all of humanity simultaneously...but you would have to put aside your old patriarchal thinking and games to do it. Do you have the courage to leap into unknown waters without a lifeboat?

    By :
    pdjmoo
    - Posted on :
    11/05/2012
  • We need a revolution indeed, but if a new form of central planning can achieve this is another question. The revolution we need is counter-revolution whereby society as a whole becomes free, open and efficient again. Now half of the GNP (actually more) is used to keep armies of bureaucrats shuffling papers, killing innovation and entrepreneurial initiatives in the core.
    Yes, we needs systems thinking. Systems thinking that understands that innovation and wealth creation is done by people who can think, not by spending money alone. These people need an environment that fosters their initiatives, not burdens them with rules and don'ts. One person can make a difference, the forced group thinking these days just lowers the average.

    By :
    Eric Verhulst
    - Posted on :
    14/05/2012
  • 1. I would rather promote a law-and regulation revolution. Cut all those insane "gree"-regulations which make our economy un-competitive and drive our jobs to China and India.

    2. We should use our natural ressources for energy like shale gas and not some fantasy world energy like solar-or windpower and even worse foodstuff like corn, soja or palm oil which will never be cost efficient and will destroy the environment of the world and bring great distress for the poorest of the poor all over the world.

    By :
    Guggi
    - Posted on :
    14/05/2012
  • Dear Guggi: Your response is as natural as any.

    However not all things that are Green are expensive or should cost more than the current methods.

    Just because some processing and/or an energy or fuel production process is posted as being "Green" does not mean that it should cost any more than any of the previous or existing and other methods of doing same. I can quote for you an example where not far from here (in Italy) a company is about to start manufacturing the renewable fuels for transport uses (in Malta) using Non-Food based sources of lignocellulose which will be less-expensive than making it from sugar cane in Brazil or from oil. This fuel - which in this case is Bio-ethanol - is just the required fuel we need in the EU and to make it from home originated products is absolutely ideal.
    The same Company will also be starting on a series of two similar projects in Yorkshire (at South Milford near Leeds/York, and at Goole) where they will be doing exactly the same thing.
    Now it is stated by their own web site that they will be doing the same in Morocco and elsewhere around the Mediterranean.
    Since their process takes waste to make Bioethanol and these plants cost around 25% of the incineration plants we continually see being put up to treat municipal solid waste then why on earth are we continuing to badger the Tax-Paying public with these horrndous and "old-hat" out-dated incineration plants that have causes us so much problems elsewhere.
    This renaissance of looking at GrennGrowth to stimulate te EU is mucj needed and this is but one of a series of events that is showing up that Green need not be more expensive but less expensive.

    By :
    Karel
    - Posted on :
    14/05/2012
  • Dear Karel,

    thank you for your answer but I have to disagree:

    1.To make ethanol from lignocellulose is nothing new and was done in large extent in Germany during WWI and WWII.

    2.I couldn’t find a single study which prooves that your claim of „cost-efficiency“ is correct. Even if it is cost-efficient in a pilot project of today this doesn’t say it would be cost-efficient in the future when the demand for the waste becomes more and more urgent. Straw was one a very cheap by-produkt in agriculture but after the „greenies“ discovered it is a „green“ product for house-isolation and other uses it has become so expensive that farmers who can‘t produce enough for their personal use can barrely efford it anymore. Another case would be wood chip where the prices sky rocketed during the last years. Conclusio: waste can become a very expensive product and therre is not enough waste you could use to make a real impact in energy production.

    3.You say that ethanol made from lignocellulose is a non-food-product. This is technically correct but (and there is a big but) to produce enough lignocellulose you have to plant grasses like bamboo or trees like poplar. Since there isn`t enough „free land“ to plant them you have either to use valuably land which is then lost for the environment or cut back food production and plant monocultures. Both are bad options.

    Sorry to say it but all those „wonderful green ideas to produce renewable energy“ remind me of the alchimists of the 15.th and 16.th century who wanted to make gold out of waste.

    Greatings
    Guggi

    By :
    Guggi
    - Posted on :
    15/05/2012
  • This will never happen as the EU leaders and Mandarins are their own worst enemy, as they only listen to themselves and their so-called 'wise advisers. That is where the building falls down as the 'right' foundations are never put in place to create future economic dynamism.

    Even the unemployment problem is self inflicted by the EU and could have been avoided in perpetuity if the leaders and mandarins had listen years ago. Indeed employment would still be increasing even in these harsh economic times throughout the world. The creation of new advanced technological markets is at the very heart of this continual solution to constantly create jobs. The youth in the EU deserve a great deal better and change in the mindsets of our leaders has to come to provide better times for them.

    For the biggest reason why the EU is in the terrible constantly unfolding socio-economic disaster is not all to do with inept politicians and unscrupulous bankers with no empathy with society, but a total lack of not having a driving economic policy based upon innovation and its exploitation. In this respect one can never get away from the fact that ALL real and ‘New’ wealth is technologically based. When we look at the history of the world, advanced technological concerns have always been at the leading-edge of the wealthiest and most powerful entities in the world. The reason, new technology makes old thinking and established technology redundant over time. The great companies of the world that we presently have are predominantly technologically driven. ‘Apple’ is a prime example of how technology can drive at times a corporate to the very pinnacle of the world’s richest companies. Not that long ago in relative terms, it may have gone bust. Therefore technology turns around the financial fortunes of corporations and creates vast numbers of jobs in the process.

    Therefore the EU’s problems are firmly based in not having an innovative structure that exploits this fundamental building block of economic dynamism. The ‘elites’ in the EU may think that they have but where they are simply deluding themselves and the 750 million Europeans within the EU. Indeed if the European Commission thinks that they have got it so right, why are we in constant stagnant waters when it comes to the global export markets where they decline more than advance year on year?

    What the EU has to do for its survival is to create the pan-European infrastructure that allows innovation and its exploitation to flourish. Presently we have not got this even though the ‘élites’ think that we have. Common sense dictates that we have to have new fundamental thinking first and not research and development first, which the EU leaders and mandarins think is the correct step-wise mechanism - they simply leave out the most important, the fundamental creative stage which is the most vital for our future.

    It is time to save the EU if it wants to be saved. There are differing views on this but exist or not, the successful or dire effects will be on the people of Europe, not the bureaucrats who decide our futures. Therefore not until we have a totally integrated system that is working throughout the whole of the EU when it comes to innovation, we shall continue in decline. Why cannot the powers that be see the reasoning in establishing a pan-EU system of creative incubators, for that is where the long-term prosperity of Europeans resides (the most creative people in the world through international studies)? But possibly this is because they do not understand. The reason, they never wish to think-out-of-the-box and to listen to those who just might have the solutions. Elitism I am afraid will be the death of us economically and socially over time !!!

    Dr David Hill
    Chief Executive
    World Innovation Foundation

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    30/05/2012
Growth - everyone's talking about it
Background: 

The election of a socialist in the eurozone's second largest economy is seen by many as a potential game-changer for the European Union.

With François Hollande, France is expected to push harder for growth-enhancing measures alongside fiscal discipline as a way to tackle the eurozone's ongoing debt crisis.

For Germany, which has been the main driver behind the austerity consensus in Europe, Hollande will certainly prove a more difficult partner than his predecessor Nicolas Sarkozy.

Policymakers and economists – particularly among the socialists – claim the eurozone has been too focused on fiscal consolidation, which hurts economic growth, making debt sustainability even harder and threatening to start a vicious circle of austerity and shrinking output.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Communication Partners

Sponsors

Videos

EU Priorities 2020 News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Priorities 2020 Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising