EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Commission takes gamble, seeks 6.8% budget rise

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 25 April 2012

The European Commission will risk accusations of double standards today (25 April) when it proposes a 6.8% increase in the European Union's budget for next year despite calls for fiscal discipline across the bloc.

A draft EU document shows the executive will seek an increase to €138 billion from the current €129.1 billion.

The Commission says the €8.9-billion increase is needed to meet prior EU payment commitments, but such a rise is sensitive given it has led calls over the past two years for EU governments to slash public spending to bring the eurozone's debt crisis under control.

Concern within some Commission departments about how the request will be perceived in EU capitals means the figure and how to present it will be discussed by the 27 EU commissioners ahead of the scheduled announcement.

"Some cabinets were worried that the proposed increase of 6.8% in payment appropriations would risk being wrongly interpreted," said the minutes of a meeting of senior Commission officials held on 23 April, seen by Reuters.

"The College [of Commissioners] should therefore have a political discussion mainly focused on the adequate level of payment appropriations to propose for 2013, and the right way to present this draft budget," the document said.

A spokesman for EU Budget Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski said he was unable to comment on leaked proposals.

Increase seen as unavoidable

But one Commission source said while a rise in EU payments next year was unavoidable, the budget proposal would seek to limit the increase in new EU spending commitments in 2013 to 2%, just above the expected rate of inflation.

Commitments are legal pledges by the EU to fund projects and policies over several years, while payments reflect the amount EU governments must contribute annually to cover those commitments.

"Today's commitments by definition are tomorrow's payments. Once the bills arrive you have to pay them, and the Commission has little control over that," the source said on condition of anonymity.

"However, we have more control over commitments, and to avoid member states having to face huge bills in the future, we will ask for an increase in commitments in line with inflation, which is almost like a freeze."

Once finalised, the Commission's EU budget proposals must be jointly agreed by member governments and lawmakers. While the European Parliament usually supports the Commission's spending plans, they are likely to face strong opposition from large governments that are net contributors to the EU budget.

"The UK has been consistent that at a time when member states are tightening their belts, the EU must show budgetary restraint," a British government spokesman in Brussels told Reuters.

More for research, innovation

In negotiations last year on the EU budget for 2012, governments ultimately rejected a 5% rise in EU spending, settling on an increase of 2%.

Talks on next year's budget are likely to take until December and will run in parallel with more difficult haggling over the EU's budget for 2014-2020. The Commission has proposed an allocation of almost €1 trillion for its long-term budget.

The Commission has suggested an increase in spending on areas such as research and innovation from 2014 in an effort to boost economic growth and job-creation.

But regional development funding and agricultural spending would together still account for nearly three-quarters of total EU spending up to 2020.

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • How can any politician be as divorced from reality as those in the European Commission and still hope to be considered sane? My purchasing power goes down on a daily basis and yet these clowns want more??

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    25/04/2012
  • The future of EU is going wrong.Burocratic spendings and huge budget to gives us almost nothing has no future.next time I am allowed to vote I will vote no.

    By :
    antonio cristovao
    - Posted on :
    25/04/2012
  • Significant sums of money can be found from eliminating many if not all of these useless EU Quangos, the value of which seem doubtful if not actually non-existent. The Commission wants more money (for any reason, I really don't care)? get your house in order just like we are trying inthe UK and all of the other countries

    By :
    Don Latuske
    - Posted on :
    25/04/2012
  • Lets pull the plug on the European External Action Service for starters. This service just burns money and in my view for no significant benefit. In fact is seems to be trying to compete with the larger government foreign departments.

    How can anyone take Cathy Ashton seriously? I am sure her family think she is great but Gordon Brown really was having a laugh when he made the appointment.

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    01/05/2012
Background: 

Talks on 24 April between EU foreign ministers in Luxembourg on the Commission's 2014-2020 proposals revealed deep divisions between the biggest net contributors to the EU budget and its main recipients.

Germany, Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands are among the countries seeking to cut at least €100 billion from the Commission's proposal proposal of nearly €1 trillion, with regional development funding one of the most likely targets for spending cuts.

But poorer member states in central and eastern Europe, which stand to benefit most from regional funding for new roads and other infrastructure projects, said they would oppose any cut in the proposed €336 billion budget for such measures.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Euro & Finance News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Euro & Finance Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising