EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU supervisors bow to finance bigwigs, argue investors

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 15 September 2011
Tags
finance

Consumer groups have filed a complaint against the 'severe imbalance' of new quasi-consultancy groups, set up to inform pan-European financial supervisory bodies, which have disproportionately more financial bigwigs than investors.

Yesterday (14 September) BEUC and EuroInvestors, lobbyists representing consumers and investors respectively, filed a compliant with the EU Ombudsman against the composition of new stakeholder groups designed to advise the European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).

While investors argue that they are worryingly underrepresented in three stakeholder groups belonging to the two pan-European watchdogs, the supervisors who compiled the groups argue that they were towing a fine line between having experts and satisfying quotas on nationality and gender.

"The interaction of these criteria, in particular the ones related to the geographical and gender balance, was a dynamic factor in the finalisation of the composition of the group," Andrea Enria, the head of the EBA, said in a letter written to EuroInvestors.

But lobbyists for consumers argue that the imbalance will do more harm than good, as it reinforces the already keenly felt influence of the financial lobby on European policymakers.

"They are severely imbalanced. This will aggravate the financial crisis. One of the reasons for the crisis, as recognised by the European Commission, is the failure of financial supervision due to the one-sided influence of the financial industry," Guillaume Prache, the managing director of EuroInvestors, told EurActiv.

Prache said he was particularly worried that the "ticking time bomb" of pensions, which will suffer if there are not more consumers, savers and pension fund participants, would not be adequately represented in the stakeholder groups. As yet there are only two investors around the table compared to 16 bigwigs from the financial industry.

EIOPA has two groups, one for pensions and one for insurance. In the insurance group there are four consumer advocates out of a total of 30 participants. In the EBA's group, just three out of 30 members represent consumers.

Consumer lobby BEUC added that it was misleading and inappropriate that credit rating agencies like Standard & Poor's or auditors like Pricewaterhouse Coopers were chosen to represent users of banking services.

Positions: 

"This is grossly contradictory to many public statements of the European Authorities repeated since the financial crisis, committing to make the voice of financial services users 'much more strongly heard on all financial issues', and to restore balance between the representation of financial services providers and that of users," Guillaume Prache, the managing director of EuroInvestors, said in a statement.

"It is typical that the supervisory authorities so blatantly favour the financial industry. While many European politicians finally acknowledge that consumers and users of financial services are clearly under-represented in political discussions, the newly set-up authorities stick to the same old reflexes," said Monique Goyens from European consumer lobby BEUC.

"This allocation has been decided by the Board of Supervisors on the grounds of ensuring, to the greatest extent possible, an appropriate geographical and gender balance and representation of stakeholders across the Union. The number and the quality of the applications received per category of stakeholders were some of the criteria considered while attributing seats among the different categories," Andrea Enria, the head of the European Banking Authority, said in a recent letter. 

Next steps: 
  • October: EIOPA and EBA expected to respond to EU Ombudsman.
Background: 

The EU's financial supervision architecture was decided in June 2009, at the height of the global financial crisis. It comprises a European Systemic Risk Board for macro-prudential supervision (ESRB) and European Supervisory Authorities (ESA) for micro-prudential supervision. The three ESAs are the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Securities and Markets Regulator. 

Since the ESRB's inception, the body has been heavily criticised for aligning itself too closely with the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks. Critics also point out that the new body has no binding legal powers. Observers say that the board's authority will depend on the eminence of the people on the General Board, the ESRB's decision-maker. The board will be made up of governors from the 27 national central banks, the president and vice-president of the ECB, a member of the European Commission and the chairpersons of the three ESAs.

While the EU Ombusdman has no binding powers to compel compliance with its rulings, the level of compliance is high. The Ombudsman mainly relies on similar powers to the European Commission, such as peer pressure and publicity.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Euro & Finance News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Euro & Finance Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising