EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

France, Germany kick plans for deeper union into the long grass

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 31 May 2013, updated 03 June 2013

Paris and Berlin have delayed plans for deepening the economic and monetary union until after next year’s European elections, following talks in Paris between German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President François Hollande on the future of the eurozone.

The heads of the core two eurozone nations met on 30 May to discuss proposals to strengthen the eurozone as it emerges from the worst of a three-year sovereign debt crisis which threatened the collapse of the bloc’s single currency.

European ministers will flesh out common proposals for a deeper economic and monetary union (EMU) ahead of an EU summit scheduled for 28 June.

The two heads of government had committed to coming up with proposals on 22 January, on the anniversary of the Élysée Treaty, which 50 years ago paved the way for closer cooperation between the two countries on matters of foreign policy.

While in Paris Merkel and Hollande reaffirmed this commitment but the two appeared to kick plans for stronger eurozone governance into the long grass, focusing instead on short-term eurozone stability measures.

“The efforts undertaken by member states to continue growth friendly fiscal consolidation stabilise the eurozone, preserve its integrity and thus restore confidence in the future of EMU,” Merkel and Hollande said in a joint statement. “The deepening of the EMU should be implemented while ensuring at every stage and at every level the democratic nature of decisions and the effectiveness of procedures.”

“France and Germany propose to strengthen the governance of the euro area after the next European elections with the beginning of the next terms office of the presidents of the European institutions.” In short, a deeper EMU will not come straight away.

‘After the next European elections’

The governments list a number of possible measures for post-2014 on stronger eurozone governance. These include:

  • More regular eurozone summits, a full-time president of the eurogroup of finance ministers and summits just for the eurozone ministers in areas such as employment or social affairs, research, and economic policy.
  • A separate eurozone parliament "to ensure adequate democratic control and legitimacy of European decision-making".
  • A greater role for European social partners, including employment organisations and trade unions, and possible social summits.

But unlike in France, a deeper eurozone EMU is a controversial subject for Germans, who are wary that it could lead to a “two-speed” Europe that separates the 17-nation bloc from the rest of the union. Germany is deeply attached to the single market but fears becoming a “eurozone treasury” for the rest of bloc, should it run into further debt problems.

Merkel may believe in fiscal cooperation and a federal union of sorts as a cure to the eurozone’s economic woes. But the task of creating one will fall on the shoulders of the next leaders of the eurozone, and well after the German elections in September this year.

Next steps: 
  • 28 June: EU summit to flesh out proposals for a deeper economic and monetary union
  • 22 Sept. 2013: German federal elections
  • 22-25 May 2014: European Parliament elections
Marc Hall

COMMENTS

  • “The eurozone as it emerges from the worst of a three-year sovereign debt crisis which threatened the collapse of the bloc’s single currency.” Who says the crisis is over ?

    The austerity regime which until recently was proclaimed as the only way forward has been watered down with France, Poland, Spain et al given extra time to meet the fiscal targets which until earlier this week we were told were critical. Belgium found ‘guilty’ of breaking the rules but no penalty imposed (although quite how fining a country already struggling financially would help is beyond me).

    ‘Advice’ has been given to a number of countries which has been met with a certain hostility e.g. President Hollande, not to mention the history of states failing to implement the reforms that have previously been promised and agreed due to domestic considerations.

    The EZ still has different states with wildly different economies all facing a single interest rate and unable to devalue.

    The original flaws therefore still seem to be in place.

    To top it all, unemployment figures today show new record highs for unemployment and the OECD forecasts a further reduction in the EZ economy of 0.6% for the rest of this year on top of the previous 6 quarters of shrinkage so social forces are clear.

    I sincerely hope that matters improve if only because it would also help the UK economically, but I fail to see how the situation is fundamentally better now than it was six months ago. The pressures for a completion of the EMU with all that means politically are unlikely to abate and will be triggered when the markets decide one or more states are not following the path set out. Given the many precedents since the foundation of the euro of non-compliance, I ask again why anyone should think the crisis is truly over?

    By :
    Iwantout
    - Posted on :
    31/05/2013
  • "but the two appeared to kick plans for stronger eurozone governance into the long grass"

    What is this shit again !

    I would now vote NO for EU !

    By :
    I'm not an European
    - Posted on :
    01/06/2013
  • They made it they got It !

    By :
    I'm not an European
    - Posted on :
    01/06/2013
  • SAY NO to IT !

    By :
    I'm not an European
    - Posted on :
    01/06/2013
  • It's a little bit controversial for me !!
    My name is bunny

    •More regular eurozone summits, a full-time president of the eurogroup of finance ministers and summits just for the eurozone ministers in areas such as employment or social affairs, research, and economic policy.
    •A separate eurozone parliament "to ensure adequate democratic control and legitimacy of European decision-making".
    •A greater role for European social partners, including employment organisations and trade unions, and possible social summits.

    And then :

    "Merkel may believe in fiscal cooperation and a federal union of sorts as a cure to the eurozone’s economic woes. But the task of creating one will fall on the shoulders of the next leaders of the eurozone, and well after the German elections in September this year."

    But why not directly tackle the economic problem with a real Euro-Budget and a Bondmarket ?
    I don't understand this since southern-states are becoming angry !Why waiting until economic deeps more in recession ??!!

    Any clue ???? Thanks!

    By :
    an European
    - Posted on :
    01/06/2013
  • Germany is right to be cautious, to avoid being the backstop for Eurozone finances. Germans have worked long and hard to create a sensible and effective economy (and society), while other Eurozone members have become free-riders.

    France is becoming a free-rider because it lacks the political will to drive economic and social changes as they hope to benefit from all this largesse when their economy implodes. Their leisurely indecisiveness is breathtaking -- but turkey's don't vote for Christmas any more than the 57% of the French workforce that is paid from taxpayers' money will vote for public sector reform. (France has created a public state that now reinforces its own importance at every turn and cannot get out of the maze of their own creation -- but then why would it want to -- they believe the state can pick economic winners and is a strategic business partner despite graduates of the grandes ecoles having zero business acumen!! C'est domage.)

    Such is the facade of Eurozone politics that politicians dare not say the words that need to be said -- fear walks the corridors of power in the Eurozone, and the crisis of public finances is far from over, but should be seen as the new normal.

    By :
    terreverte
    - Posted on :
    03/06/2013
  • terreverte - Posted on :03/06/2013
    But if they are continuing the new normalizing it won't take very long until the new anormalizing splitt the European Union ! 5 Years in recession and still not out merely for southern-states with this Austery measures !
    If I were Mr.Rajoy I would say " Mrs Angela ! Either you apply a Bond-market If not I would apply the Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty ! People don't need Austerity or long take irrational decisions from Head's of states but a Job!

    Americans knows the sense of an Union but we don't !
    That's why theirs economy recovers have less unemployment unlike in the EU ..That's the true !!

    But it seems some of 27 Head's of States with their "IQ+1000" have an firewall installed to understand that!

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    04/06/2013
  • The post by Iwantout summaries the position depressingly well.

    Like him I can see no advantage in this for the UK and hope that we are proved wrong. If you also read the story on this blog about the ILO report on the increased potential for social unrest, put the two together and it is really worrying.

    http://euractiv.us1.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=8f42af8d26b382b0bcc4930b2&id=324504d74c&e=c12435a827

    By :
    George Mc
    - Posted on :
    04/06/2013
German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President François Hollande on 29 May 2013 at the the Élysée Palace in Paris, the president's official residence
Background: 

At a summit in October, EU leaders were presented with an interim report by European Council President Herman Van Rompuy, which charts a path towards closer fiscal integration among the 17 countries using the euro.

The interim report followed an earlier draft that Van Rompuy tabled jointly with European Commission President José Manuel Barroso, Eurogroup then-President Jean-Claude Juncker and European Central BankPresident Mario Draghi – the so-called "four presidents".

The most far-reaching suggestions in the report included:

  • Setting "upper limits" on member states' annual budgets;
  • "Prior approval" for issuing government;
  • debt "beyond the level agreed in common";
  • Issuance of "common debt" as a medium term option;
  • Setting up an EU "treasury office";
  • Closer coordination on "labour mobility" and "tax coordination".

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Videos

EU Treaty and Institutions News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

EU Treaty and Institutions Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising