EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Germany's Schäuble calls for new EU treaty

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 02 September 2011

Far-reaching financial governance reforms are needed to solve the debt crisis and that would likely require a new EU treaty, said German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble in an interview with the daily Bild Zeitung. 

According to Bild, Schäuble spelled out his plan at a behind-closed-doors meeting of leaders of his conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU) yesterday (1 September).

Shifting greater powers over economic and financial policy to Brussels is necessary, he reportedly said, "even though we know how difficult a treaty change will be".

Some EU leaders, including Chancellor Angela Merkel, have argued that a treaty change could help enforce fiscal rules to avoid repeats of the debt crises plaguing members of the euro zone, including Greece, Ireland and Portugal, which have required costly bailouts.

"I will push for necessary treaty changes so that we can act sooner and more effectively when things go wrong, including with targeted sanctions," Merkel said at the time.

"Europe must learn the right lessons for the future [...] We have seen that the instruments of the euro zone as they currently stand are insufficient," Merkel said.

Schäuble, however, insisted that such reforms were needed even if they threatened to further divide the 17 EU member states that used the euro and the remaining 10 that did not.

The Treaty on European Union, signed in Maastricht in 1992, came into force in 1993, and making changes in the years since then has proven cumbersome and complicated.

The most recent example was the signing of the Lisbon Treaty, which was eventually ratified by all 27 member states after heated debate in some countries, especially those which were required to hold a referendum. One major stumbling block was the rejection of the treaty in a 2008 Irish referendum, which was reversed the following year in a second vote.

Schäuble's proposal may also face opposition in the Budestag, Germany's federal parliament, where some MPs have criticised the government's decisions over the eurozone bailouts. 

COMMENTS

  • Of course any such Treaty would cause the UK Government to activate it's so called referendum lock and would be voted down in a UK referendum.

    Then what?

    By :
    Gawain Towler
    - Posted on :
    02/09/2011
  • You'll never get this through, not this time.

    This is Germany's final push, well, too bad, the EU is dead.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    02/09/2011
  • The german government is right : a major change in the Treaty chapter relating to "economic policy" is necessary - if only to legitimate the measures already taken by the EU to combat the crisis and prevent their resurgence .

    Whether or not such reform will be accepted by all 27 member states or even the 17 eurozone countries is, at this stage, irrelevant.

    Work on the Treaty revision must start as soon as possible so that a democratic debate can take place before the 2014 EP elections and renewal of the Commission .

    The formal revision initiative might come from the german government . But it might also initiate from the EP itself which has constantly criticized the lack of adequate economic governance capacity in the Lisbonne treaty.

    Jean-Guy GIRAUD

    By :
    jean guy giraud
    - Posted on :
    03/09/2011
  • I doubt whether the UK will be alone rejecting a new referendum. The only way this will get through is by ignoring the electorate of every North European country and that would be highly dangerous.

    By :
    Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    03/09/2011
  • Another treaty? Didn't we just finish the last one? I'm afraid more treaty changes will provoke some sort of eurosclerosis (of the political sort). But then again, failure to fix the economic problems means eurosclerosis (of the economic sort) anyway...

    By :
    Another Anonymous
    - Posted on :
    04/09/2011
  • So pessimism is our only horizon?

    By :
    Anonymous3
    - Posted on :
    04/09/2011
  • Another Treaty but the same neo-liberal EU vision will get us nowhere. We need a fundamental rethink: what do we want to do together to face the enormous challenges of the 21st century and with whom do we want to work?
    The EU of the 1992 internal market vision is dead. We need a new vision, a new finality for the EU before getting into the quagmire of treaty change again.

    By :
    WDB
    - Posted on :
    05/09/2011
  • A new treaty amendment would only trigger the UK's referendum lock if it transfers powers from Westminster to the EU. If the treaty amendment did not transfer powers to the EU at all, or if it transferred powers only from eurozone countries, or if the UK otherwise had an opt-out from any transfer of powers, then no referendum would be necessary.

    By :
    Steve Peers
    - Posted on :
    05/09/2011
  • In any case the Lisbon Treaty should be be re-ratified, since Its Annex I is constructed on the basis of Brussels nomenclature -- the system which does not exist for more than 20 years...

    By :
    Stranger
    - Posted on :
    06/09/2011
  • The are more not existing documents ratified in the Lisbon Treaty. These facts only proves the necessity to seriously repair the text of the Lisbon Treaty and to re-ratify It.
    Lets look:
    Art 174. of the Lisbon Treaty (TFEU):
    "The Union shall also support the achievement of these objectives by the action it takes through the Structural Funds (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section; European Social Fund; European Regional Development Fund), the European Investment Bank and the other existing Financial Instruments."
    Art 178 of the Lisbon Treaty (TFEU):
    "With regard to the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guidance Section, and the European Social Fund, Articles 43 and 164 respectively shall continue to apply".
    But European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund does not exist any more.
    Two new funds were created by Regulation 1290/2005.
    And though these funds were created in 2005, the text of the Lisbon Treaty does not reflect these changes.

    By :
    Stranger
    - Posted on :
    07/09/2011

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Euro & Finance News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Euro & Finance Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising