EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

UK warned: Parliament to hit back on bankers’ bonuses

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 July 2012

The European Parliament will stand firm against Britain's attempt to limit proposals designed to curb bankers' bonuses and the powers of the European Banking Authority, an influential MEP told EurActiv.

Othmar Karas, an Austrian MEP from the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), said in an interview that new EU rules to beef up bank capital should be agreed in a single Parliamentary hearing this autumn.

Karas, who is the Parliament's rapporteur on the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV), explained that the issue was removed from the schedule of this week’s Strasbourg plenary – where it was slated to be discussed today (5 July) – because it would only have been debated, rather than agreed.

Rules designed to beef up bank capital in the wake of the financial crisis were agreed by EU finance ministers on 15 May after the UK won a concession enabling it to preserve control over national supervisory authorities.

The agreement was dogged by a dispute over whether countries like Britain should be allowed to enforce stricter capital rules than those agreed for at the European Union level.

'Everyone can do what he wants'

Britain has been fighting to maintain financial authority over the City of London, Europe's finance capital, as other EU members move to centralise supervision of banking and finance in Brussels and the London-based European Banking Authority (EBA).

But Karas indicated that the Parliament will seek to more power for the EBA.

“We say not all power must go to the EBA, but nor should there be too much flexibility," he said. "You cannot have European regulation and then open the last page of the text, and it says everyone can do what he wants.”

Britain is also keen to prevent the introduction of de-facto curbs on bankers pay. The Parliament is fighting for a ratio of one-to-one, salary to bonus, in the sector, whereas member states such as the UK want limits on bonuses to be left to the discretion of shareholders.

Vicky Ford, a Conservative MEP and member of Parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee, told the British newspaper the Daily Telegraph on 16 June that there was “a lot of sympathy” for more flexible rules that would allow shareholders the final say on how much banks can pay their staff.

Karas cast doubt over that analysis, saying that he would continue to push for the one-to-one ratio, and implying that any deal involving shareholders’ discretion would be limited.

Barclays’ chief earned €26 million last year

“One possible result would be to involve the shareholders for anything above that [one-to-one ratio], so for example there could be a basic rule of 1:1, giving companies the option of increasing the bonus to up to 1:1.5, but only on condition that this was done with the acquiescence of the shareholders,” Karas said.

Banking culture in the City of London is the subject of domestic scrutiny in the wake of an interbank interest rate-fixing scandal which saw Barclays fined €360 million last week by the UK Financial Services Authority.

Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond – who earned €26 million last year in salary, bonuses and share options, and is reported to have a personal wealth of €132 million – resigned on Monday.

Positions: 

“The problem everybody has is that if you cap bonuses you push up basic salaries and that would go against the previous rules put in place, which require banks to link pay to long-term performance,” said Vicky Ford MEP (UK; Conservatives & Reformists) cited in the Daily Telegraph on 16 June.

Next steps: 
  • Sept./Oct. 2012: European parliament to debate Capital Requirements Directive
Jeremy Fleming

COMMENTS

  • A big quandary for the British - which cabal is the most odious? The mafia styled bankers or the unelected EU commission and the elected but otherwise unaccountable European Parliament?

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    05/07/2012
  • Charles-M would you care to expand on "unaccountable Euro Parliament". Does this mean any parliament is "unaccountable" or is this a property unique to the EP?

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    05/07/2012
  • Well Mike, the EP spends 180 million Euros per years on its monthly Strasbourg / Brussels circus, with chauffeurs, first class travel, 5 star hotels, Chateau Lafitte lubricated dining, etc. 99 out of 100 European citizens might find this puts the EP in the banker class, but it carries on year after year and shows no sign of coming to an end. Just one example of unnacounability. Now they want to vote in a bigger budget every year while the rest of us see diminishing incomes.

    By :
    Charles_M
    - Posted on :
    05/07/2012
  • So on a bigger scale they do what the UK parliament did? (and perhaps other national parliaments?)

    You say they want to vote in a bigger budget - is that a bigger expenses budget or a bigger EU budget?

    Talking of "banker class" I understand Diamond of barclays trousered £100m during his time with the bank - are the MEPs really in this class?

    Finally, which ones are drinking Lafitte - just asking cause I'd like to try and get an invite to one of their events, Lafitte being a wine I have yet to try.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    05/07/2012
  • Interesting that the article refers to teh City of London as Europe's Finance capital. Does that make Brussels the capital of Europe? I thought only countries had capitals. I could understand the CoL being referred to as the major Finance centre of Europe. I guess this is just part and parcel of the deception. If you refer to soemthing long enough as a capital, eventually people begin to accept it and all that it entails.......
    Regarding EP accountability, I do not fully understand whatthe amorphous masses are that MEPs belong to. when they leave here, the UK, I understand them to be Tory or Labour etc. party members. The groupings they enter make no sense to me. In a parliament, I expect to see a government and opposition. I expect to see a government manifesto that enabled me to vote for the representatives inthe first place. I have never seen anything here or elsewhere in Europe that said we are moving towards becoming the United States of Europe. Hopefully, with the current disasters, it may just end up being the United States of Europe with merely france and Germany locked together in line with the original Monnet vision thayt saw france trying to limit Germany's power.

    By :
    Don Latuske
    - Posted on :
    05/07/2012
Barclays' Diamond - bouffant wealth
Background: 

The Basel Committee comprises regulators from 27 countries - including the United States, Britain and China - to set prudential rules for banks.

The group in 2010 agreed to more than triple the core capital than lenders must hold to protect themselves from insolvency as part of a measures to prevent a recurrence of the financial crisis that followed the collapse in 2008 of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

The measures, known as Basel III, must be implemented into nations’ laws before they take effect.

Denmark, whose six month EU presidency has just expired, sought to translate the higher capital standards set by the Basel Committee regulators into EU law by the start of next year by reaching a consensus and an accord with the European Parliament by the end of June.

The compromise allowed a margin of flexibility so countries that want to can require their banks to increase their capital buffers up to 3 % beyond the minimum of 7% required by the Basel rules, without clearing their decisions through the Commission or European Banking Authority.

The new Basel rules must be in place by the beginning of next year, and they will affect up to 8,300 European banks.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising