EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU warns Portugal to stick to fiscal targets after court ruling

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 08 April 2013, updated 09 April 2013

The European Commission has urged Lisbon to stay the course on reducing its budget deficit after the country’s Constitutional Court on Friday (5 April) rejected key parts of the government’s 2013 austerity budget, including cuts to holiday bonuses for pensioners and public servants and reductions in sickness leave and unemployment benefits.

 

Portugal’s Prime Minister Pedro Passos Coelho said in a televised address on Sunday (7 April) that the Constitutional Court ruling posed "serious obstacles and risks" this year and next, but reaffirmed his commitment to the fiscal and economic adjustment programme under an EU/IMF bailout.

"The government is committed to all the objectives of the programme," he said, ruling out further tax hikes but saying it was vital to avoid a second rescue and that he had told ministers to cut spending.

In Brussels, the European Commission welcomed the statement and urged Lisbon to stick to its €78-billion bailout plan, “including its fiscal targets and timeline.”

“Any departure from the programme's objectives, or their re-negotiation, would in fact neutralise the efforts already made and achieved by the Portuguese citizens, namely the growing investor confidence in Portugal, and prolong the difficulties from the adjustment,” the Commission said in a statement.

€1 billion shortfall

Lisbon was left scrambling to avoid a second bailout after Portugal’s highest court annulled key austerity measures in its 2013 budget meant to meet deficit targets agreed with its international lenders.

The court on Friday rejected four out of nine contested austerity measures in this year's budget, including cuts to holiday bonuses for pensioners and public servants and reductions in sickness leave and unemployment benefits.

Analysts expect Portugal to be able to agree replacement measures with the European Union and International Monetary Fund to make up for the court ruling, which could cost it between €900 million and €1.3 billion.

The entire package of austerity measures included in the 2013 budget is worth about €5 billion. The largest tax hikes in living memory were mostly upheld by the court.

The court's decision came before an informal meeting of eurozone finance ministers this week in Dublin, which is expected to approve extensions of rescue loan maturities for Portugal and Ireland.

Passos Coelho acknowledged that the ruling weakened Portugal's stance at the meeting, but said he told Finance Minister Vitor Gaspar to do all he could to protect the country's interests there and achieve an extension.

The government says the extension is essential for Lisbon's successful exit from the bailout programme in 2014.

Lisbon has to cut the budget deficit to 5.5% of gross domestic product this year from 6.4% in 2012, when it missed the goal but was still lauded by lenders for its efforts. The lenders have eased Portugal's deficit goals twice since the rescue was agreed, recognising consolidation efforts.

Portugal returned to the bond market for the first time since its 2011 bailout in January, selling debt due in 2017, and has been preparing a longer-maturity bond issue. Analysts say the court ruling may now delay the new issue.

ILO questions austerity

Meanwhile, the rationale of austerity was challenged by the International Labour Organization (ILO), which has called for “an urgent shift” of strategy to tackle the deepening unemployment crisis in Europe.

“While fiscal and competitiveness goals are important, it is crucial not to tackle them through austerity measures and structural reforms that do not address the root causes of the crisis,” the ILO said in a snapshot of the EU labour market published on Monday (8 April).

According to the ILO, the employment situation has continued to deteriorate since the introduction of fiscal consolidation policies, with one million people losing their jobs in the EU over the past 6 months. More than 26 million Europeans are now without a job, the ILO said.

Next steps: 
  • 12 April: Informal meeting of Eurozone finance ministers in Dublin (Eurogroup)
EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • European Union should retrieve the €78-billion bailout Money and urging for an EU out Propose !
    This will alleviate the depth from the EU ..

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    08/04/2013
  • This is "right wing populist" but the facts are there!
    Bailouts on Wall st, housing bubbles and Government Motors are of course part of the same; then the politicians go to the moguls to "donate" to their campaigns for election. Some call it "democracy!"

    What have "progressives" to say on the subject? Is there a collaborative solution? Do we leave it to demagogues?
    Why I Don't Support Europe's Bailouts
    Our political leaders borrow ever more money to pay off the banks, which return the favor by lending ever more money back to our governments
    By TIMO SOINI
    When I had the honor of leading the True Finn Party to electoral victory in April, we made a solemn promise to oppose the bailouts of euro-zone member states. Europe is suffering from the economic gangrene of insolvency—both public and private. Unless we amputate that which cannot be saved, we risk poisoning the whole body.
    To understand the real nature and purpose of the bailouts, we first have to understand who really benefits from them.
    At the risk of being accused of populism, we'll begin with the obvious: It is not the little guy ho benefits. He is being milked and lied to in order to keep the insolvent system running. He is paid less and taxed more to provide the money needed to keep this Ponzi scheme going. Meanwhile, a symbiosis has developed between politicians and banks: Our political leaders borrow ever more money to pay off the banks, which return the favor by lending ever more money back to our governments.
    In a true market economy, bad choices get penalized. Instead of accepting losses on unsound investments—which would have led to the probable collapse of some banks—it was decided to transfer the losses to taxpayers via loans, guarantees and opaque constructs such as the European Financial Stability Fund.
    The money did not go to help indebted economies. It flowed through the European Central Bank and recipient states to the coffers of big banks and investment funds.
    Further contrary to the official wisdom, the recipient states did not want such "help," not this way. The natural option for them was to admit insolvency and let failed private lenders, wherever they were based, eat their losses.
    That was not to be. Ireland was forced to take the money. The same happened to Portugal.
    View Full Image

    Getty Images
    Unfortunately for this financial and political cartel, their plan isn't working. Already under this scheme, Greece, Ireland and Portugal are ruined. They will never be able to save and grow fast enough to pay back the debts with which Brussels has saddled them in the name of saving them.
    Setting up the European Stability Mechanism is no solution. It would institutionalize the system of wealth transfers from private citizens to compromised politicians and failed bankers, creating a huge moral hazard and destroying what remains of Europe's competitive banking landscape.
    Fortunately, it is not too late to stop the rot. For the banks, we need honest, serious stress tests. Stop the current politically inspired farce. Instead, have parallel assessments done by regulators and independent groups including stakeholders and academics. Trust, but verify.
    Insolvent banks and financial institutions must be shut down, purging insolvency from the system. We must restore the market principle of freedom to fail.
    If some banks are recapitalized with taxpayer money, taxpayers should get ownership stakes in return, and the entire board should be kicked out. But before any such taxpayer participation can be contemplated, it is essential to first apply big haircuts to bondholders.
    For sovereign debt, the freedom to fail is again key. Significant restructuring is needed for genuine recovery. Yes, markets will punish defaulting states, but they are also quick to forgive. Current plans are destroying the real economies of Europe through elevated taxes and transfers of wealth from ordinary families to the coffers of insolvent states and banks. A restructuring that left a country's debt burden at a manageable level and encouraged a return to growth-oriented policies could lead to a swift return to international debt markets.
    This is not just about economics. People feel betrayed. In Ireland, the incoming parties to the new government promised to hold senior bondholders responsible, but under pressure they succumbed, leaving their voters with a sense of disenfranchisement. The elites in Brussels have said that Finland must honor its commitments to its European partners, but Brussels is silent on whether national politicians should honor their commitments to their own voters.
    I was raised to know that genocidal war must never again be visited on our continent and I came to understand the values and principles that originally motivated the establishment of what became the European Union. This Europe, this vision, was one that offered the people of Finland and all of Europe the gift of peace founded on democracy, freedom and justice. This is a Europe worth having, so it is with great distress that I see this project being put in jeopardy by a political elite who would sacrifice the interests of Europe's ordinary people in order to protect certain corporate interests.
    Mr. Soini is chairman of the True Finn Party in Finland.

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    08/04/2013
  • I use the term "fictitious capital" to describe what the Big Bankers, public and private, are attempting to inflict on the ordinary 99% people who through their entrepreneur led labour create ALL REAL value, capital included.
    In the middle of the 19th century Karl Marx coined this term to describe the notes and loans that governments and gentry used to finance wars, luxuries, estates and otherwise living beyond their REAL means. Only his term was really new, Aristotle and many who followed him before Marx, elaborated on the dangers of worthless money. Democratic Athens and militaristic Sparta supplied the concrete examples of value and fictitious (worthless).
    At Marx’ time such paper would accrue during "Boom" times as the economy expanded and would usually max out at around 10-12% of a countries GDP. As long as the good times rolled on it was not a problem, but came a crisis of over production (of all the wrong things) there would be the day of reckoning. Ergo, the bill collectors came and cash not paper promises was the order of the day. This resulted in a variety of ways to settle; some were paid in part or in full but more often bankruptcies and swindles resulted. Then the stage was set for the next cycle - boom bust.
    Today though the situation with 'fictitious' or 'counterfeit' capital is vastly different.
    100 years of pumped up growth for growths sake first based on the now discredited ideas of John Maynard Keynes has produced a situation where some 20 times the worlds gross product exists as fictitious capital, a counterfeit collection of deficits, bills, bonds, exchanges, derivatives, bubbles (real estate) swaps and the latest fraud, "quantitive easing". (Le Monde Diplomatique puts it at 50 times)

    $$Dollars, Єєuros, RRubles, Ль, &с…all the same!!

    To grasp the idiocy inherent in these figures imagine approaching your friendly personal banker for a loan, line of credit or mortgage some 20 times your net collateral worth; how far do you suppose that might fly?
    Yet with the above listed gimmicks, that is precisely what members of the Bankster clique, supported by military-industrial complexes do amongst themselves.
    Every day we read of new Central and private bank meetings, "Increasing capital base" is their current fad.
    OFF THE WALL!
    There is not a farthing of REAL capital in all of this rat-bag of lies, swindles and manipulations.
    REAL capital is ONLY accumulated labour dedicated to enhancing future production. Ergo entrepreneur led LABOUR (of the 99%) is the only source that can augment existing capital or create new.
    The banksters, led by the IMF, USA FED, and British "financial services" are well aware of this fact but that will not stop them from attempting to download this fraud onto the REAL product of Labour in the form of "bailouts" of "sovereign" debts, to be serviced by taxes on the REAL producers.
    After stealing the depositors (unsecured creditors) monies for what ever they can get the Banksters will continue as follows:
    The 99% will be robbed of (much prepaid) social services and benefits to service "debts". “Austerity” it is called when those who had NO hand in running up this fraud are required to pay interest that will amount to 40-60% of the future product of their labour. Gone will be pensions, good schools, decent medical care, infrastructure (e.g. utilities that work reliably); environmental protection even adequate diets will be history.

    "Let them eat cake!" exclaimed La Royale Marie Antoinette.
    Let them eat (genetically modified) garbage, implies La Grande Dame Christine La Garde, of the International Monetary Fascists(IMF)

    So Greece, you are the front line today, Italy and Spain may be next, but do not think that any country, including the relatively well off Germany or the resource rich Canada and Australia will be forever exempt. Ms Merkel, beware!
    The "poor little ones" are but appetizers; they will whet the appetites of these financial service vultures and jackals. For certain, like buzzards flocking to road kill, if they succeed in the beginning the taste of financial carrion will make them hunger for more, and they will finish only when the 99% of humanity is subject as debtors to enslavement by the 1%.

    But this does not have to be!
    Greece, Cyprus, Portugal, you can repudiate the fraud! Lead the way! DEFAULT, Repudiate, is the way to go!
    99%; be inclusive! Occupy-Idlenomore, Support Greece, Cyprus and Slovenia today, Italy Spain, …, &c. tomorrow and.../?/ the world in future.
    Hold on to your souls! Hang tough!
    You have a WORLD to WIN!!

    P.S. For those of you who may have read this comment previously, Churchill’s advice immediately springs to mind:
    “When you have an important point to make, don’t try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile-driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time – a tremendous whack.”

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    08/04/2013
  • Mr David Tarbuck as i said mainly times only an united countries of Europe would work!
    The need of an upper state for economic federal policies!
    Maybe it's not important enough but it's a matter of time it will be one...

    By :
    an european
    - Posted on :
    08/04/2013
  • Katherine has been a great choice; she was delighted to have been given the chance to work and study in her home town. Her youth and enthusiasm brought new life to the libraries and her willingness to learn from her colleagues and mentors was noticed from the start. It has been a pleasure to watch Katherine grow in knowledge and experience.
    Jackson

    By :
    Jackson
    - Posted on :
    11/04/2013
  • We have a very good and almost unic state all over world: Multiple visions and proposals freely, public and open expressed. Lets work together to preserve ours minds free and listen and disagree with other opinions with strong respect.

    By :
    antonio cristovao
    - Posted on :
    16/04/2013
Prime Minister Pedro Passos Coelho of Portugal arrives in Brussels for a European summit, 14 March 2013 (Photo: Council of the European Union)
Background: 

Portuguese President Aníbal Cavaco Silva announced in his New Year’s address that he would put his country’s controversial draft 2013 budget before the Constitutional Court.

The draft budget didn't treat citizens fairly, he argued, saying it would hit some worse than others. The country is in a vicious circle of austerity and recession, he said, adding that Portugal's foreign debt, now twice as high as the country's annual output, was unsustainable..

Prime Minister Cavaco Silva signed the 2013 budget into law earlier on 31 December, which included the biggest tax hikes in living memory.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Euro & Finance News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Euro & Finance Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising