EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Top audit firms brace for new UK, EU rules

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 31 January 2013

PricewaterhouseCoopers held the top spot in rankings for accounting income last year, a sector where fees are being squeezed by increased regulatory scrutiny and competition, according to an industry survey published on Wednesday (30 January).

The closely watched annual survey, published by the International Accounting Bulletin, showed that the "Big Four" accounting firms – PwC, Deloitte, KPMG and Ernst & Young – took 67% of the total $165.4 billion (€121.8bn) in fees which the sector earned in 2012, little changed from 2011.

Deloitte maintained its position as the second largest firm, just $210 million (€154.7mln) in fees behind PwC's $14.9 billion (€11bn). Growth in income at the big firms collectively slowed to 6% from 8% in 2011.

"There have been almost no year-on-year changes in market share within the Big Four," the survey said.

Still, the fees gap between third-ranked Ernst & Young and fourth-placed KPMG rose sharply in 2012 to $1.4 billion (€1.03bn), compared with only $170 million (€125.2mln) in 2011.

The sector is braced for potentially radical changes.

The UK Competition Commission is investigating whether there is enough competition in auditing large firms and will report next month with possible reforms.

Meanwhile the European Union is working on a draft law to require a periodic "rotation" or mandatory switching of auditors by clients, an idea U.S. regulators are also looking at.

The survey said client behaviour is already changing in anticipation of these reforms.

More and more public companies have told CEOs of accounting firms that they were thinking more seriously about putting their audit requirement out to tender, examining their auditors, and starting to consider smaller accounting firms for their tax and advisory work, the survey said.

Outside the Big Four, BDO remains in fifth place in the rankings, followed by Grant Thornton, RSM, Baker Tilly International, Crowe Horwath International and Nexia.

EurActiv.com with Reuters

COMMENTS

  • fyi

    By :
    philip
    - Posted on :
    01/02/2013
  • fyi

    By :
    philip
    - Posted on :
    01/02/2013
  • FYI

    ppppppppppppppppppp

    By :
    philip
    - Posted on :
    01/02/2013
  • There is a rather more serious question to be asked: firms that provide audit services - i.e. that certify that the accounts of a company are clean legal and honest, also provide tax dodging services. It is quite normal to see the same company doing both things with the pathetic claim that there are "chinese walls" between the two activities. If the EU/EC were serious (the UK Competition Commission is not - to much revolving door stuff (out of the UK CC and into law firms or said accountants) - not my view by the way but that of DG Competition) they would require a break up i.e. companies providing audit services cannot do anything else. The big 4 use the audit services as a loss leader - to get a foot in the door and then sell a host of other services including tax dodging services. The EC has some leverage, given it is a major purchaser of services from the big 4. Of course it won't happen - lobbying being what it is.

    By :
    Mike Parr
    - Posted on :
    01/02/2013
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP logo still (Photo: PwC)
Background: 

The European Commission tabled a draft regulation in November 2011, requiring that audit firms rotate their work regularly and spin off consultancy work, measures that would favour smaller audit outfits.

>> Read: Commission braced for battle with big audit firms

The European Union adopted a directive in 2006 which aimed to restore confidence in capital markets by strengthening the quality and independence of auditing of company accounts.

The directive came in the aftermath of international accounting scandals involving US firm Enron and which brought to collapse one of the top global auditing firms, Arthur Andersen.

In 2008, Brussels reviewed for the first time the auditing directive. But immediately after the entry into force of the new rules, and on the wake of the US subprime crisis, the Commission started a new review of the sector which ended up in December 2010 with the collection of responses to a wide public consultation aimed at changing again the key piece of EU legislation on auditing.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising