China penetrates deeper into Ukrainian economy

greedy mad men caused this rescission let them sort it out but Ukraine is a nice country and has suffered in the past at the hands of the Russian so its time other people invested in the Ukraine and give it independence from others

i thought we already did by buying every thing from them some one has to supply things to Ukraine CHINA is better than Russia even thought there human rights issues suck b but if it wasn't china it would be some other country its just business at least some people can get jobs out of it

This appears to be a good deal, both for China and Ukraine. Agricultural for infrastructure and modest priced consumer products.

In particular, China has the financial reserves to aid Ukraine in seeking independence from the International Monetary Fascists(IMF).

Ukraine needs options other than potential dictators from Europe and/or Russia; each of those options comes with the price of accepting interference in what ought to be strictly domestic affairs.

Perhaps China is a little too loose in not pressuring trade partners in such as worker protection legislature but I prefer errors in the direction of MYOB rather than meddling.

No need to bone up on history it is the present and future that should concern us all. There is a great deal too than what you think. You probably do not know that one of our members, HE Jian Song former vice-premier of China for 13 years was the person responsible for changing the direction of China towards an economy to be based up science, engineering and technology. Note not an economist or historian but one of China's top engineers.

The west knows little of the strategy of China and people are sucked in because of lack of this knowledge.

If you are young enough you will se a different world I can tell you in 25 years time and one that you will not like.

If you can tell me othrwise please do and what your world will look like in 2037?

Dr David Hill
Chief executive
Wold Innovation Foundation

China is no worse than the other dictators they do things for the good of the people unlike the others who don't care about the people look at the world with the USA as a leader so many suffer so China is no worse apart from there human rights issues in CHINA

David

Just to give you a bit of an idea what is going on in the wider world and I stress a little, I copy and paste an extract from the Guardian newspaper by international economist Economist Dambisa Moyo.

…If Moyo's calculations are correct, we are in big trouble – which makes the central premise of her book, Winner Takes All, all the more arresting. Governments across the world, she writes, have singularly failed to grasp what's coming – with one sensational exception. "Simply put, the Chinese are on a global shopping spree." State-sponsored Chinese corporations are busy buying up commodities across Africa, North America, the Middle East, South America – anywhere they can – in a concerted strategy to seize control of resources before the rest of the world wakes up to the looming crisis. They're striking deals with what she calls the "axis of the unloved" – developing countries rich in commodities but poor in political and economic capital – in return for much needed investment, employment and infrastructure. Extravagant shoppers, the Chinese are happy to pay over the odds, treating their trading partners not as poverty-ridden charity cases nor political pariahs but valued commercial equals. But when the resources begin to run dry, the consequences will be catastrophic. Already, since 1990 at least 18 violent conflicts worldwide have been triggered by competition for resources. If nothing is done now, warns Moyo, commodity wars on a terrifying scale are all but inevitable.

Part review of the new book ‘Winner takes all by Economist Dambisa Moyo - Guardian, 24 June 2012

Dr David Hill
Chief executive
World Innovation Foundation

Yes, but natural resources are running out at an unsustainable rate and many several of the basic 'Elements' will disappear completely over the next 15 years. These are not my figures but eminent resources economists and researchers in the field. The problem is that many are needed to preserve (and increase) advanced technologies that we need to sustain our present status quo. Once these are gone they are not replaceable. The EU Environment commissioner only reinforced the situation at Rio 2 recently where he said on our present path of doing business we shall need the natural resources of 'TWO' planet earths. My foundation stated in our scientific discovery newsletter 15 year ago that by the turn of the 21st century we would need the resources of 3 planet earths.

Respectfully I gave a 1-hour presentation to the Women in Management (WIM) of the chartered Management Institute in Leeds (UK) last week and where this may enlighten you more of what is on the horizon for humankind if we do not change our ways of doing business. You may also be interested in visiting and reading about how even eminent scientific magazines operate with the big corporations - http://foolscrow.wordpress.com/2010/07/27/return-to-nuremberg-big-pharma-must-answer-for-crimes-against-humanity/ .
It is in part from a scientific perspective but also from a vital point if we are to sustain ourselves as a specie past this current century.

If you wish me to send you a copy, just post your email coordinate on this EurActiv comment feedback or give me a ring on 0044(0)1484.537181.

Dr David Hill
Chief executive
Wold Innovation Foundation