EU summit rolls out red carpet for Ukraine's Yatsenyuk


EU leaders will receive today (6 March) Ukraine’s interim Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk at their extraordinary summit in Brussels, in which leaders are set to discuss a response to the escalation of the crisis in Ukraine.

Yatsenyuk, who is leading a caretaker government since 26 February after former President Viktor Yanukovich left the country, is expected to be given a treatment usually reserved for a head of state.

Yesterday the EU offered Yanukovich’s government 11 billion in financial aid for the next couple of years, provided Kyiv reaches a deal with the International Monetary Fund. The sum matches exactly Russian President Vladimir Putin’s previous offer, which had rewarded Yanukovich for not signing the Association Agreement (AA) with the EU.

The move can be seen as highly unusual by EU standards, especially after the numerous statements from EU officials that the Union was not going to enter a bidding exercise about Ukraine.

Russia doesn’t see the current Ukraine government as legitimate but EU diplomats who spoke to Brussels journalists yesterday insisted that Yatsenyuk’s government was legitimate, as it has been approved by two thirds of the Ukraine Parliament’s members.

Yatnesyuk will also be offered an acceleration of negotiations on visa liberalisation and and a free trade pact, both of which will be put on a fast track, EU diplomats said.

EU leaders are also widely expected to qualify Russia’s military incursion into Crimea as "an act of aggression" that was "in clear violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity" and which violates the UN Charter.

Although all options are on the table, it is less certain that EU leaders will agree any biting sanctions against Russia, with whom many countries have vested business interests. As surreal as it may appear, France is currently selling two warships to Russia, as part of a 1.2 billion deal that could mark the biggest-ever sale of NATO weaponry to Moscow.

France said EU leaders meeting in Brussels on Thursday could decide on sanctions against Russia if there is no "de-escalation" by then. Other EU countries, including Germany, are more reticent about sanctions.

One major decision expected from the summit is a date for when the AA could be signed with Ukraine. A high-level Ukrainian diplomat recently said that Kyiv wanted to sign the landmark agreement on the occasion of the regular EU summit on 20-21 March. But EU officials conveyed the message that the Union did not want to rush with the signature.

The EU summit takes place against the background of failure of diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis in Ukraine in Paris yesterday, with Moscow and Washington at odds and Russia's foreign minister refusing to recognise his Ukrainian counterpart.

US Secretary of State John Kerry said discussions would continue in the coming days in an attempt to stabilise the crisis and he expected to meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov again in Rome today.

The US State Department in fact dropped its diplomatic niceties on Wednesday and all but accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of lying about events in Ukraine, publishing a list of what it said were 10 of his "false claims."

A "fact sheet" released by the State Department's press office said Putin had ignored or distorted the facts in "justifying Russian aggression in the Ukraine."

And NATO, at a meeting in Brussels, announced it was cutting back on cooperation with Russia to try to pressure it into backing down on Ukraine and suspended planning for a joint mission linked to Syrian chemical weapons. The alliance said it would step up engagement with Ukraine's new leadership.

The West is pushing for Russia to return troops to barracks, accept international monitors in Crimea and Ukraine and negotiate a solution to the crisis through a "contact group" probably under the auspices of a pan-European security body.

The Pentagon will more than double the number of US fighter jets on a NATO air patrol mission in the Baltics and do more training with Poland's air force as it strives to reassure allies alarmed by the crisis in Ukraine, officials in Washington said on Wednesday.



dpb's picture

Estonian foreign minister confirms that Kiev shootings were black flag operation. EU rolls out red carpet for war criminals and furthers it's reputation as organ of peace. Expect new Ukraine government to get invitation to The Hague sometime soon. This is so hard to fabricate you'd almost think someone made it up!

Vladomir's picture

The Thugs and Neo-Nazis in the Ukraine who are being lauded here as saviours have espoused their rights to oust all Jews Russians Lithuanians Moldavians Byelorussians by whetever means and kill them.

European's picture

dpb, no he didn't, he just raised some questions about certain incidents, on the basis of what one individual told him.

If you are so concerned about the shootings then you would demand that Russian ally Yanukovich's role also be investigated. But, you don't care about the truth.

One wonders, however, just who recorded and leaked his phone call. Do you know?

There is no "new Ukrainian government", there is an interim government that was elected by the members of the Ukrainian parliament. There is nothing to link the members of the interim government to any shootings, however the Putinistas try to twist and spin things.

The only people complaining about the interim government, aside from the Putinistas who infest comments threads, are certain groups in the Crimea. Fine, if they want Crimea to become Russia, let it - then Russia will have absolutely no excuse to interfere in Ukraine.

There will be elections for a new Ukrainian government in May. Putin will not be able to deny the validity of that government. It must really annoy him that, aside from the Moscow-initiated seizures in the Crimea, there are no mass protests against the interim government.

The best way to resolve all issues, including any crimes that anyone may have committed, is to have free, open and transparent elections where all sides can put their views across and are not stifled or threatened for their political positions. Except, Putin fears truly free elections in Ukraine because a freely elected government that expressses the will of the Ukrainian people would not be pro-Putin, but EU-oriented.

Eurojourno's picture

Dear Euractiv,
The Commission proposed to support the Ukraine with 11 billion euro, Barroso didn't offer money to ousted president Yanukovich's government (!!). See 5th line.
Thanks for correcting,

dpb's picture
"The Estonian Foreign Ministry has confirmed the recording of his conversation with EU foreign policy chief is authentic. Urmas Paet said that snipers who shot at protesters and police in Kiev were hired by Maidan leaders"

Obfuscation, deceit and lies abound. The elections will be decisive but the last election also was decisive. Was it? Did it not decide who would govern the Ukraine? The EU has a track record of throwing out the governments they dislike. Italy, Greece and now the Ukraine. The Americans walk into whichever country they care and throw the electoral process down the tubes. The EU and the Americans seem agreed on the way to go. May they all rot in hell

European's picture

dpb, Inotice you post from - a very objective source for sure!

Except, it lies about what the foreign minister said.
The Estonian government itself said "Foreign Minister Paet was giving an overview of what he had heard the previous day in Kiev and expressed concern over the situation on the ground. We reject the claim that Paet was giving an assessment of the opposition's involvement in the violence."
So, which Estonian confirms that "snipers who shot at protesters and police in Kiev were hired by Maidan leaders"?
The call - which Russian spies recorded - was authentic, but the interpretation Russian propaganda then tried to spin on it is a LIE.

This is what the doctor who Russian propaganda is trying to claim said she saw opposition snipers shooting actually has to say about the issue:
"I think you can only say something like this on the basis of fact," she said. "Its not correct and its not good to do this. It should be based on fact."

And, you still can't avoid the fact that the vast majority of Ukrainians want NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA.

But, you avoid telling us who you think secretly recorded and leaked the (edited) call. Who was it, dpb?

dpb's picture

You're an intelligent man. You will realise that high stakes mean a high level of lies, deceit and deception. The EU needs to believe that the last Ukraine election was a falsification in order to maintain it's assault on the sovereign state. The elections in May will prove Russian leanings when the naiive in the west continue to believe - and propogate agitation and violence in the name of one city (Kiev) that the Ukraine vote leans westwards. Kiev leans west. Where does the Ukraine lean? Should they be allowed that vote? Scary, huh?

European's picture

So, dpb, you must be the last person still supporting Yanukovych (whom you can't even name). If he was so sure that "his" people still loved him, then why has he run away?

Of course, it's easy to see why you are so unable to believe the truth - after all, you believe lies such as "Estonian government confirms that opposition hitmen fired at civilians".

Another lie you seem to believe is that the EU is doubting the election of Yanukovich. It never has. We have never denied he was legitimitely elected in 2010. This is why we were even negotiating with him over the association agreement and were even negotiating with him just over a week ago. What has happened in the past few months however is that the Ukrainian people themselves have overthrown him. It was the parliament that was elected by the Ukrainian people - including the deputies of his own party - who voted to get rid of him and install an interim government.

Ukraine should certainly be allowed free elections. Absolutely. If they vote for a Russian-oriented government, then good for them. It relieves the EU of the problem of having tolook after Ukraine, which has a lot of problems. And, if they vote for a western-oriented government, then you too should respect that.

If Crimea wants to leave, then I personally don't have a problem with it leaving. That would solve the problem of Putin finding an excuse to interfere in Ukraine all the time. If Crimea joins Russia, then that will mean Ukraine as a whole will be even more western-oriented.

There is a real stench of hypocrisy about someone who propogandises for the Russian line claiming they are standing up for the sovereignty of Ukraine.

You still haven't told us who recorded and leaked the call between the Estonian foreign minister and Ashton (and also heavily edited it).

European's picture

dpb, with that wonderful response, I guess you don't even realise that you just lost the argument, just like you've lost Ukraine.

And you still haven't told us who secretly recorded, heavily edited and then leaked select parts of that phone call.

dpb's picture

I lost Ukraine? You are an idiot. Don't talk to me again unless you have Hungary and Italy to offer in exchange for Poland and latvia. Possibly Estonia, too. Depends on my mood.

You sound like a nice guy, European and I would probably regard you as such were we ever to meet. Chances are we won't and the chances are I will always agitate for a destruction of the European Union but I respect your views. I shall try to keep it civil. Sorry for the 'idiot' remark. Best man will win without too much blood shed, I hope

European's picture

dpb, all those countries you mention are in the EU by their own choice, and they're not yours (or mine) to give.

I'm glad, however, that you admit you're agitating for the destruction of the EU. You will be disappointed, however, and there won't be any bloodshed because we're not warmongers.

Nations join the EU by choice, unlike this "Eurasian Economic Union" that Putin wants to start, where he is basically trying to do all he can to force Ukraine to join.

Thanks also for confirming by your silence that Russia secretly recorded, heavily edited and then leaked a private conversation between European politicians.

David Bennett's picture

Never been silent, my friend. (what is your name? - are you anonymous for a reason?)
The EU will fall down on its own lack of logic given that 28/27/28 however many states cannot live together under one roof. Many cultures all combined into one German ideal? I think not. The EU will fail because we are all so different. The Brits especially don't play well with others :)