EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU voices concern over Ukrainian vote count

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 05 November 2012, updated 06 November 2012

Just days after the parliamentary election in Ukraine, EU officials in Brussels expressed “increased concern” over the vote count, while the opposition denounced a series of falsifications.

The EU's foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton and Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policy Commissioner Štefan Füle said they had “followed closely” the vote count following the 28 October election.

While the vote generally took place in normal conditions, the tabulation – or the transfer of the results from individual constituencies to higher level authorities – has raised questions among international observers.

The EU officials expressed concern that five days after polls closed, the consolidated results were still not announced. Ashton and Füle urged the authorities and all parties involved “to take the necessary steps to finalise the tabulation allowing for the rapid announcement of the final results, which should reflect the genuine will of the Ukrainian voters”.

With most of the votes counted, the ruling Party of Regions won 30.01% of the vote, the United Opposition, 25.52%, the UDAR movement of boxer Vitali Klitschko 13.95%, the Communist Party 13.18% and the ultra-nationalist Svoboda party 10.44%.

No winners determined in nine constituencies

On Saturday, six days after the election, no winners had been determined in nine single-member election constituencies due to the problems with tabulation and litigation.

In Kyiv, a representative of the Party of Regions, Ihor Lysov, was challenging the victory of a candidate of the Batkivschyna All-Ukrainian Union, Serhiy Teriokhin, in court. On Friday, the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal confirmed a lower court's ruling obliging the district election commission to recount votes at more than 40 polling stations of the constituency.

In Pervomaisk (Mykolaiv region), riot police were called in due to confrontations between supporters of the two leading candidates, the Kyiv Post reported.

The Central Election Commission first said that opposition candidate Arkadiy Kornatsky won with 39.66% of the vote, while his opponent, the Party of Regions member, Vitaliy Travianko, took 34.09%. However, the CEC later released new figures showing that Travianko had beaten Kornatsky.

The Mykolaiv District Administrative Court refused to verify the data of the vote count protocol and decided that a recount should be conducted by the district election commission. At the same time, the commission still cannot start the recount and approve the final report, since its head Vasyl Mykytiuk disappeared along with the commission's seal on 2 November.

Opposition cries foul

Both the Batkivshyna party of imprisoned former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko and Vitaly Klitschko’s UDAR called the elections rigged.

Batkivshyna officials said in a statement that the verdict was confirmed by a parallel vote count conducted by the Spilna Sprava (Common Cause) NGO. Its coordinator Oleksandr Danyliuk said that the NGO’s count revealed that independent candidates and those from the opposition led in several majority constituencies, in which candidates from the ruling party were declared winners by the CEC.

Danyliuk said that falsifications took place in Vinnytsia, Khmelnytsky, Zhytomyr, Poltava, Kirovohrad, and Cherkasy regions. He said that the falsification techniques were similar to those registered in a number of Kyiv constituencies, in particular the correction of vote count protocols by district election commissions.

Ukraine’s largest election monitor, OPORA, was critical of the tabulation and transmission of results from the district election commissions. Its observers recorded numerous procedural violations including “taking stamps outside polling stations, which is prohibited by law; precinct election commissions delaying the signing of the vote count protocols, etc.”

The opposition is threatening not to send its elected deputies to parliament, as a protest to the election fraud, news media reported.

In Brussels, the European Policy Centre think tank cancelled a conference dedicated to Ukraine scheduled for today (5 November).

“Due to the delay in announcing the results of the Ukrainian elections, several of the speakers have had to stay in Ukraine,” the EPC said.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • It seems like the authorities underestimated the Ukrainians’ aspiration to changes. The Party of Regions facing inability to gain enough votes to form a simple majority of itself in Verkhovna Rada engaged the ballot-rigging in some single-member constituencies. To fulfill the task the controlled courts and the law-enforcement agencies were involved.
    Well, those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it (George Santayana ©). Here in Kyiv now we have a mass meeting near Central Election Commission. People led by opposition insist on the invalidation of election results in the constituencies where opposition candidates were deprived of victory. Would it outgrow into something grater? We’ll see...
    It is noteworthy that the rally against the hypocrisy of power runs precisely the Guy Fawkes Day.
    Remember, remember, the 5th of November…
    Volodymyr Mishchenko
    peoplefirst.org.ua

    By :
    Ukrainian Foundation for Democracy "People First"
    - Posted on :
    05/11/2012
  • Looking at the whole picture it is obvious that the "opposition" has its full share of bullies out to cheat EACH other as well as the Party of Regions.

    Batkivshyna has played off against both UDAR and Svoboda, perhaps with the tacit agreement of Communists and Regionaires?

    This is understandable; If it were not for the sympathy vote for those jailed by old SOVIET purge laws, Batkivshyna by now would have followed 'Our Ukraine' into oblivion.

    The Regionaires understand this and fear the new UDAR as the real(up and coming) opposition. It is perfectly legitimate for a government to favour one opponent over another; provided they were to refrain from illegal election tactics it is all part of a fair game.

    However none of the above solve the problem of a lack of a democratic "LOYAL opposition"; that is an opposition that offers constructive criticism and constitutes a group waiting to take command in a future election. Such LOYAL opponents are viewed as competitors, rivals and opponents but NOT as foes or enemies.

    Mr. Klichko, in politics, just as in BOXING, the opponent you knock out is NOT one you wish to be entombed, nor should HE want that for you. If worthy he wants a legitimate REMATCH!!

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    06/11/2012
  • Brussels is concerned about the "lack of democracy in Ukraine", but is comfortable and has no problem with the "outburst of democracy" which is happening in its "cradle of democracy" Greece.

    By :
    Concerned Ukrainian
    - Posted on :
    08/11/2012
Ashton: EU watches closely
Background: 

The December 2011 EU-Ukraine Summit failed to initial the country's Association Agreement with the Union, largely due to the imprisonment of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko that Brussels sees as politically motivated.

The five-year long negotiations over the Association Agreement were concluded, but EU leaders made it clear that the deal would not be signed until improvements are made to the "quality of democracy and rule of law" in Ukraine.

European Council President Herman Van Rompuy also made it clear that the country's association agreement, which includes a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, would not be signed until the parliamentary elections in Ukraine due in October 2012.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Europe's East News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Europe's East Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising