EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Pussy Riot among candidates for Sakharov prize

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 13 September 2012, updated 17 September 2012

Russian punk band Pussy Riot, whose three female musicians were sentenced to two years in prison after staging an anti-Vladimir Putin protest in a Moscow cathedral, are among the candidates for the European Parliament’s annual Sakharov Prize, EurActiv has learned.

Pussy Riot was nominated by German MEP Werner Schulz (Greens/EFA) and gathered the signatures of 45 other MEPs. Candidates for the prize can be nominated either by a political group or by a minimum of 40 MEPs.

Pussy Riot members Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, Maria Alyokhina, 24, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 30, were convicted on 17 August of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred for performing a "punk prayer" in Moscow's Christ the Saviour Cathedral in which they called on the Virgin Mary to rid Russia of President Vladimir Putin. Their sentence caused widespread indignation and condemnation from both the European Union and United States.

Pussy Riot has been publicly backed by dozens of prominent musicians, including Paul McCartney, Madonna, the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Björk, Bryan Adams, Sting and Yoko Ono.

Other nominees

Ales Bialiatski, an imprisoned Belarussian opposition activist; Joseph Francis, an activist assisting victims of Pakistan’s blasphemy law; three jailed opposition representatives in Rwanda; and two Iranian intellectuals have also been nominated by MEPs as candidates for the Parliament’s Sakharov Prize, intended to honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.

The political groups and individual MEPs who nominated the candidates will make presentations of the candidates on 25 September in Brussels. The award ceremony takes place in Strasbourg around 10 December, the day on which the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights was signed in 1948.

Among the nominees, the front-runner appears to be Ales Bialiatski, a freedom fighter and human rights defender currently imprisoned by the Belarussian regime. He was nominated by Polish MEP Jacek Saryusz-Wolski (European People's Party), who gathered the signatures of other 82 MEPs. The European Parliament has already expressed its support for Bialiatski in a resolution of 15 September 2011. Bialiatski has been also nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Francis, the founder and director of the Centre for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement which defends victims of Pakistan's blasphemy laws, was nominated by the European Conservatives and Reformists Group. Accusations of blasphemy often result in harassment, threats and attacks. Several prominent politicians have been assassinated for their opposition to blasphemy law.

Three imprisoned Rwandan opposition representatives, who have tried to put an end to the cycle of violence by fostering dialogue and reconciliation, were nominated by Spanish MEPs Willy Meyer (Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left),  Rosa Estaràs (EPP), María Muñiz (Socialists and Democrats),  Ana Miranda (Green/EFA group), and 37 other MEPs. The activists are Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, Déogratias Mushayidi and Bernard Ntaganda.

The Iranians are Nasrin Sotoudeh, a lawyer and human rights advocate who has represented imprisoned opposition activists and politicians following the disputed June 2009 presidential elections, as well as juvenile offenders facing the death sentence. She was arrested in September 2010 on charges of spreading propaganda and conspiring to harm state security and has been imprisoned in solitary confinement.

The other nominee is Jafar Panahi, a Iranian film director, screenwriter and film editor. He first achieved international recognition with his feature film debut "The White Balloon" in 1995, which won the Caméra d'Or at the 1995 Cannes Film Festival.

They were nominated by Spanish MEP José Ignacio Salafranca (EPP), German MEP Elmar Brok (EPP) and 11 others.

Next steps: 
  • 25 Sept.: Presentation of the candidates by those who nominated them
  • 9 Oct.: Vote to determine this year's winner of the Sakharov Prize
  • December: Awards ceremony
Georgi Gotev

COMMENTS

  • The Sakharov Prize was established as a means to honour individuals or organizations who have dedicated their lives to the defence of human rights and freedom of thought.
    Qualifying Pussy Riot’s political hooliganism as a self-sacrificing struggle for democracy would be of great mistake.
    In fact, the Pussy Riot’s case is merely an example of Russian repressive justice in action.
    Do these Russian girls really deserve the place in one line with Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi, Leyla Zana and other respectful recipients of the Sakharov Prize? No, they don’t.
    Not least because their action has hurt many Christians’ feelings, not only in Russia.
    It’s a kind of religious extremism that could provoke inadequate response from religious people’s side.
    Excuse my humour noir, but if only Pussy Riot’s had performed their action in mosque, not in Orthodox church, they could had been nominated for the Prize posthumously…

    By :
    Volodymyr Mishchenko, UFD "People First"
    - Posted on :
    14/09/2012
  • Fully agree!Nominating Pussy Riot for Sakharov Price is a great mistake. Their action has been that of disrespect for others' believes and worst, it has been in DETRIMENT of freedom of expression. Freedom means respect for other human beings. Pussy Riot have shown no respect for anybody. "The end does not justify the means".

    By :
    Cecilia
    - Posted on :
    15/09/2012
  • I very much support the nomination of Pussy Riot for the Sahrarov prize. The three members of
    The Pussy Riot: Nadezhda Tolokonnikova, 22, Maria Alyokhina, 24, and Yekaterina Samutsevich, 30, who were convicted on 17 August of hooliganism has been convicted just of using their human right to say an opinion and to protest against totalitarism and a lack of freedom in Russia. They did this in the creative multimedia way of using music, sound, clothes and sign. By these activities they have reached millions of people worldwide. So they have done a big part of making conscious what has to be done in Russia on the way to a democratic society.
    Dr. Wolfgang Mahns (Germany)- Doctor of Musik Therapy

    By :
    Dr. Wolfgang Mahns
    - Posted on :
    15/09/2012
  • They should get a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize as they had the courage to stand up to what is becoming a Stalinist-like leader that is turning the political wheels back in Russia.

    More should stage such outbursts against a regime that is becoming more of a dictatorship by the year and that is how Hitler and Stalin operated in their early days as history well recalls. Unfortunately when the soviet people realised what was happening it was too late as the old USSR was totally controlled by one man by then. THe same has not to happen again through Putin's obsession with control and ultimate power.

    For unless Putin changes his spots, Russia apparently is going the same way. Putin and his family are unofficially the richest people in the world now according to financial analysis with a fortune of around $130 billion. Puts Carlos Slim the official richest person @ $69 billion in skid row to a certain extent. The young of Russia are seeing what is happening and they have to do something before their nation gets to the stage that Stalin got it too and where the outcome was eventually dire for the people.

    Indeed, the young of Russia have no future under a dictatiorship and where the three from Pussy Riot should be fully supported internationally as they can build a momentum in bringing true democracy again to Russia that Gorby started and succedded in doing to a certain extent. Since those times of early democracy in Russia, things have gone politically backwards. Complacency is what has made previous dictators take control of nations, hopefully it will not happen with the likes of Pussy Riot at the forefront who can lead the way to Russia's 'true' future social democracy and freedom.

    Manipulation of the people is definitely being wages in Russia.

    As I have said above, it should be a Nobel Peace Prize nomination for their incredible courage.

    Dr David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation
    United Kingdom - Switzerland

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    16/09/2012
  • it is so unfair that these 3 girls are treated as political victims, they are not! hooliganisam - this is exactly what they did, who cares what they were shouting during their actions? It it totally unfair to put these 3 ... in line with those very intelligent people who really care about their country, who really suffer from the regime, but these 3 girls have nothing to do with it! I am so much unpleasantly surprised how European people can be so blind and support those who do not deserve it at all, it is a shame! Probably 2 years in prison is a lot for them, it could be less, but to give them Sakharov's prize????? what for??? poor Sakharov, he struggled not for this, not for people as those 3, so terribly unfair for him. Too bad indeed.

    By :
    Liolia
    - Posted on :
    17/09/2012
  • To Dr David Hill:
    OK. Then let's nominate Ukrainian FEMEN movement (well-known for their topless 'protests', especially for cutting down Christian woodden cross with a chainsaw) for Nobel prize too. Most of us here in Ukraine consider them as a shame for our nation, but persons thinking your way, Mr Hill, may decide elsewise...

    By :
    Volodymyr Mishchenko, UFD "People First"
    - Posted on :
    17/09/2012
  • Volodymyr Mishchenko

    Firstly I would state that I am a Catholic and you have lost the reasoning where you cite people that I would not support myself either (Ukrainian FEMEN movement and the cutting through of crosses). The whole matter revolves around the law and what is acceptable in a respectable and non-barbaric nation. Where is free expression or reasonableness in common law is the questions that you should be asking yourself. Would you want Putin to rule over the Ukraine, I fear not but Russians are bit-by-bit being dominated by Putin and his cohorts). Look further and be wiser for your own country’s good Volodymyr or even the Ukraine might turn into a mirror image of Putin's Russia over time. In this respect history has an awful way of repeating itself.

    Dr David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation
    United Kingdom - Switzerland

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    17/09/2012
  • Dear Dr. David Hill, I am Russian, and I never voted for Putin, neither did anyone of my family and friends. We very well know (practically! not theoretically from Europe) what means the opposition in Russia, and I saw my friends being put in police cars during these meetings. You REALLY cannot see the difference between political regime victims and just hooligans as Pussy Riot or FEMEN who like to show off themselves and have nothing to do with politics? When one of Pussy Riot girls Nadezhda Tolokonnikova participated in sexual orgy in Moscow State University (this action was also entitled smth like anti-regime), nobody touched them then, when they danced on the Red Square singing songs anti-Putin, nobody touched them again. When they were disappointed with the lack of attention and decided it is not enough and danced in the Christ the Savier's cathedral - that was enough not for politicians, but for common people who felt insulted. Pussy Riot went too far not respecting people around, and believe me nobody cares for their political views, I even doubt if they have any, because those who have and defend their views, certainly choose much more decent ways to do so.

    By :
    Liolia
    - Posted on :
    17/09/2012
  • To David Hill:
    Mr. Putin was elected by majority of Russian people. Not such overwhelming as it was shown in final protocol of Election Commission, but MAJORITY. One can consider it sad, but rebellious Moscow is not nearly all the Russia.
    Putin can be legitimately dismissed ONLY by majority of Russians.
    The aim of so called Dissenters' is to make everything possible to convince people of Russia to choose alternative scenario of country’s development (represented by new leaders).
    I believe that the Pussy Riot’s performance won’t promote the growth of the number of Putin’s opponents amongst Russians. The reasons I’ve described above.
    As to My Country’s good:
    People First Foundation (and myself as a member) is always on the watch for Ukrainian Democracy and makes efforts to prevent Ukraine’s transition to Russian model of "sovereign democracy".
    To get sure, please visit our web-site and read our articles and blogs here on EurActiv.
    Regards

    By :
    Volodymyr Mishchenko, UFD "People First"
    - Posted on :
    17/09/2012
  • Although I fully understand what you say (I have travelled extensively in central Asia and know the people quite well in the region) and agree being a believer in God myself, it still boils down to the fact that at times people have to express themselves (although apparently repulsive at times) so that the wider world knows what is going on. They can make up their own minds but if no-one does anything outlandish and through inaction things go bad, only the poor suffer. Therefore I accept that what they did was apparently against God in the physical world, but where God in His wisdom will judge all when we all go before Him.

    In other words we should not judge people as their may be a higher benefit and if we do, we place ourselves on the same plateau/level as our creator. My personal judgement on Putin is long-term but where there again the ultimate arbiter can only be God and I understand this clearly. For only God knows in reality what is good and what is evil. But the history of humanity gives us clues into people and that is all that we can base our own opinions on as humble mere mortals living a relatively short life here on earth.

    Dr David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation
    United Kingdom - Switzerland

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    17/09/2012
  • I'll have a look but where I support 100% people's democracy and their rights too it. Unfortunately what I have seen, bee told by central Europeans in the know and been told by several of my UN friends, corruption at the ballot box is ripe and distotion takes place of what really the people wish to see happen.

    Independent bservers have also said the same and they cannot all be wrong.

    I send best wishes for your organization and hope that future leaders have the people in their hearts and minds and not just themselves with huge financial gains that people can only dream of. For one I only look to do good things in this life and not fantastic wealth.

    Dr David Hill
    World Innovation Foundation
    United Kingdom - Switzerland

    By :
    Dr David Hill - World Innovation Foundation
    - Posted on :
    17/09/2012
Background: 

The Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought is awarded each year by the European Parliament. The prize was set up in 1988 to honour individuals or organisations for their efforts on behalf of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

Parliament awards the human rights prize, endowed with €50,000, at a formal sitting held in Strasbourg on or around 10 December, the day on which the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights was signed in 1948.

The Soviet physicist Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov (1921-1989) was seen as a subversive dissident. In 1970, he founded a committee to defend human rights and victims of political trials. In 1975 he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his efforts.

See list of Sakharov prize winners

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Europe's East News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Europe's East Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising