EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

Ukraine seeks thaw in relations with the EU

Printer-friendly version
Send by email
Published 19 November 2012

Ukraine expects EU foreign ministers, who are meeting in Brussels today (19 November), to unfreeze its EU agenda which has been paralysed since the recent parliamentary elections.

Kostiantyn Yelisieiev, the Ukrainian ambassador in Brussels, said on Friday (16 November) that his country had “passed the test” with the parliamentary elections, held on 28 October.

The diplomat met with journalists ahead of today's EU foreign affairs ministers meeting, where EU-Ukrainian relations feature on the agenda.

Yelisieiev added that Kyiv now expects to be able to press ahead by signing an Association Agreement with the Union at a forthcoming EU-Ukraine summit.

Since the 28 October elections, EU representatives have made a few statements, mostly critical, but it looks as if Brussels will provide its overall assessment for the ministerial meeting.

Yelisieiev admitted that not everything had been perfect with the election, but insisted that they should be considered by the EU as fair, as results largely coincided with opinion polls. A proof of the free choice of people was that two new political forces were able to enter parliament, he said.

Yelisieiev drew a parallel with the US elections, held on 6 November, where various irregularities had also been reported. He also mentioned Lithuania, where new elections are going to be held in four constituencies after the 28 October poll triggered controversy. In Ukraine the same will happen in five constituencies, he said.

‘Not with an excellent note, but we passed’

“We passed the test, not with an excellent note, but we passed. So let’s continue with our EU agenda,” Yelisieiev said.

Asked by EurActiv to comment on the European Commission's concerns over the elections, the ambassador admitted that problems existed.

One of the problems is “tabulation” – the introduction of data from individual polling stations into the central register. According to many reports, irregularities took place at this level.

Another concern of the Commission appears to be “MP buying”. In Ukraine the parties with financial resource often “buy” independent MPs from majority constituencies.

According to an analysis by Ukrainian journalist Sonia Koshkina, which she contributed to EurActiv, the new Ukrainian parliament will include 185 representatives of the Party of Regions of President Viktor Yanukovich; 101 United Opposition representatives; 40 representatives of UDAR, the party of former boxing champion Vitaly Klitschko; 37 of the far-right Svoboda; 32 Communists; and 43 independent candidates who ran in single-seat constituencies. UDAR and Svoboda are new to parliament.

The current authorities consider the independent candidates a pool for their own majority. The majority must have at least 226 deputies, whereas a bigger majority of 240-245 MPs can basically unimpeded lawmaking activities. As a conclusion, Koshkina says that the victory of the Party of Regions is a "pyrrhic victory", as it could be unable to form a strong majority.

On tabulation, ​Yelisieiev said the that the irregularities did not “influence much” the election result. On MP-buying, he said there was “nothing” the government or anyone else could do against the phenomenon.

EU-Ukrainian relations have neared a freezing point. There has been no EU-Ukraine summit since December 2011, which was marred by tensions over the imprisonment of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. This year will elapse without a single EU-Ukraine summit, while the EU held a EU-Russia summit despite Russia’s election calendar.

The diplomat said that it was very difficult for him to explain to the Ukrainian people that the EU was able to holds summits with Russia, but not with Ukraine. Yelisieiev also insisted that the Association Agreement would benefit the EU more than his own country.

Russia bribes Germany with cheap gas?

Asked if he thought the EU was too hard on Ukraine, the ambassador said that distinctions should be made between the Union and its member states. He didn’t specifically name Germany, but made it plain that the largest EU country was the biggest obstacle for his country’s rapprochement with the Union.

“Why is gas for certain EU countries much cheaper?” he asked, implying that Germany was rewarded by Russia for its “tough” line on Ukraine. He also stated that his country wanted the EU to have a common strategy with regards to Russia, instead of the current divisions for which Ukraine paid a dear price.

But Yelisieiev praised the German energy firm RWE for selling Russian gas to Ukraine. RWE gets a commission and despite additional transit taxes for re-routing Russian gas from Germany through Poland to Ukraine, this gas was 20% cheaper than Gazprom’s supplies to Kyiv, he said.

Compared to the other countries, Ukraine pays the highest price for Russian gas. Ukraine imports about two-thirds of the gas it consumes from Russia, at a price of $425 (€340) per 1,000 cubic metres.

Asked about the Tymoshenko case, the envoy appeared to indicate there could be a solution if there was a dialogue at the highest level.

EurActiv.com

COMMENTS

  • How about a "thaw" just as soon as Yanukovych is put in "Cold Storage"?

    By :
    R Andrew Ohge
    - Posted on :
    19/11/2012
  • Why include the words "far right" when mentioning the Svoboda Party. This is an objective analysis and possibly not correct since many view the party as in fact being left of center. If you insist on using this adjective then why not also state the "organized crime syndicate" the Party of Regions. Also, you might want to mention "the party of genocide" the Communists, son on and so forth.

    By :
    Michael Brytan
    - Posted on :
    19/11/2012
  • There are obvious problems with the October elections which the Party of Regions will not admit to. The Ambassador has his head in the sand and pretends that all is fine and expects the EU to be satisfied. I am still not sure if Ukraine is pushing this line in the hope that it will be believed if repeated often enough, or, if by pretending that nothing is wrong they will be absolved from having to address the problem. Certainly at this time there is no acknowledgement that a problem even exists, and no progress whatever in addressing it.

    Ukraine has pushed, and continues to push the line that Tymoshenko's jailing has nothing to do with political oppression and everything to do with pursuing crimes against the State. Yanukovych has ignored the issue of selective justice from day one and seems to be looking for credit for being tough on corruption. I have not seen any reference to selective justice by any member of the Party of Regions. They are hoping that it will go away if they ignore it, but it won't. Ukraine must find a better solution to problems than just ignoring them.

    The price of Russian gas to Ukraine is another issue. Russia is squeezing Ukraine to precipitate an economic crisis so that they can buy Ukrainian assets at a fire sale price. Not only that, but they will pay for it with the money they extorted from Ukraine in excessive oil prices. This selective squeezing of Ukraine is similar in principle to the selective prosecution of Tymoshenko.

    Ukraine must not give in on the gas issue. Russia is already building pipelines to bypass Ukraine, with the sole purpose of reducing the value of the Ukrainian pipeline network that they are trying to buy. Russia will not be satisfied with just half. If they buy half, Ukraine's share of income from their remaining half share will fall by at least half, and probably more now that the value of the network is undermined. Ukraine's economic problems will continue, and Russia will use this to buy out the rest of the network. One can speculate what happens next, but it will probably include stationing Russian troops in Ukraine to "protect" their pipeline while buying up other cash strapped Ukrainian assets at bargain prices. They want a port on the Black Sea. They will take over Crimea, and then the whole of Ukraine.

    By :
    oldfogie1
    - Posted on :
    20/11/2012
  • yeliseyev is scheming and writhing once again - the results do not correspond with opinion polls, as those show straight and clear that the public opinion gives a majority to the opposition. a set of pre-elections manipulations and outward fraud in the constituencies at vote-counting phase have perverted it. this is how it was, mr. yeliseyev and you are probably well aware of these facts.

    By :
    GW
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • The talkative "Gas Princess" has much to say about the government being corrupt &c; but what does she say about the gas agreement with Russia that she negotiated?

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • Tymoshenko was over a barrel. Gas to Ukraine and to much of Europe was cut off by our "brothers" the Russians. Europe was pressuring Tymoshenko to resolve the problem. I thought the agreement was one sided, especially when signed by someone who at one time controlled the gas industry in Ukraine and was familiar with what was at stake.

    Tymoshenko did not profit from the deal, despite attempts by Yanukovych to suggest otherwise. At worst, she made an error of judgement, a political mistake if you like. Again, despite claims that "corrupt" politicians have been prosecuted, there is no evidence that she was corrupt in this matter. She was not stuffing her own pockets like Yanukovych and the "family" are now doing. Politicians make decisions, and sometimes make wrong decisions. It can be argued that this was a mistake, but that it was made with the best intentions. No politician in any democracy has ever been prosecuted and jailed for a wrong decision. I do not include here pretend democracies like Ukraine, which is a dictatorship in reality and a democracy in name only. In real democracies, politicians are judged at the ballot box, and not by their political opponents after they are first jailed after losing an election by the most slender of margins. Ukraine does not know what a democracy is and is not ready for it.

    I had hoped to visit my Ukraine and see it strong, free, and democratic before I die. I do not think that this will happen again in my lifetime.

    By :
    oldfogie1
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • This whole situation is an amazement to me. Yanukovych seems to be styling himself after Stalin. If Russia was still the Soviet Union, that might make a little Political sense, but in fact, he has to be a never-ending source of chagrin and embarrassment to the Putin Government who, for a lot of very strategically economic reasons want to see the EU morph into Eurasia. With a "Chunnel" to Alaska, they'd be smack dab in the middle of some of the headiest economic growth in history. Yanukovych continues to be the happy fly in this particular dream pie.

    What a maroon...

    By :
    R Andrew Ohge
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
  • Ms Tymoshenko's worst enemy was/is herself. Yes the bummer gas deal in 2009 was on her part only error in judgement; such errors are rightly punished in the political process without unfair judicial proceedings.

    However four points to be made;
    (1) the unfairness ORIGINATES in the old SOVIET laws still on the books that cry out to be repealed.
    (2) the individual proceedings against her were INITIATED by FORMER President Yushchenko and were ONGOING when Mr Yanukovych took the Oath of Office; this sequence lends credibility to his "refusal to interfere" and illustrates European and N. American ignorance when they blatantly call for such interference.
    (3) MS Tymoshenko was an inspiring leader or The Orange Revolution but unfortunately for all concerned she was/is unable to modify her confrontational behaviour to something presentable in the RADA or a court of law.
    Bickering (mostly with the worm she was instrumental in emaking president) as PM, refusing to stand in court when custom dictates, shouting rubbish, when a calm reasoned approach would have brought sympathy, possibly grounds for appeal AND a minimum not Maximum sentence. all contribute to doing (herself)in. Ergo "by the slender margin" she lost a FREE FAIR election to the one whom she irrationally reciprocally hates.
    (5) The recent election was not perfect but it is about par with many in N. America and Europe; its critics especially the vocal EU types need to focus more on specific incidents and rely less on generalizations that only sir up emotions without being helpful.

    By :
    david tarbuck
    - Posted on :
    22/11/2012
EU Foreign Ministers to discuss Ukraine today
Background: 

The December 2011 EU-Ukraine Summit failed to initial the country's Association Agreement with the Union, largely due to the imprisonment of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko that Brussels sees as politically motivated.

The five-year long negotiations over the Association Agreement were concluded, but EU leaders made it clear that the deal would not be signed until improvements are made to the "quality of democracy and rule of law" in Ukraine.

European Council President Herman Van Rompuy also made it clear that the country's association agreement, which includes a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, would not be signed until the parliamentary elections in Ukraine due in October 2012.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Videos

Europe's East News

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Europe's East Promoted

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Advertising

Advertising