A helping hand
The Commission's decision is an attempt to grant incentives to credit institutions, increasingly strained by the recent turmoil on financial markets, to speed up the deployment of SEPA.
Indeed, the banking sector has been claiming it will otherwise not be able to respect the November 2009 deadline for launching a SEPA direct debit scheme across the EU.
A direct debit allows a user to instruct his bank to carry out regular payments on his behalf. It is particularly useful for bill charges. A consumer no longer has to remember to pay his monthly electricity bills as his bank does it for him, using his bank account of course. Companies can also lighten their bureaucratic burden by using such a direct debit service.
So far, the operation is only possible at national level, but SEPA would make it doable at European level.
But for this to happen, banks need to invest money, particularly in updating their systems (EurActiv 24/07/08). In exchange, they want incentives.
Brussels responded to this need yesterday (4 September) by agreeing to turn a blind eye to banks charging "transitional" interbank fees (so-called multilateral interchange fees or MIFs) for direct debit services.
Consumers worse off?
In practice, acceptance of MIFs will allow the bank issuing a direct debit for its client to charge the receiving bank a fee, which at the moment can vary from three to 90 eurocents. Such fees are often passed on to the customer and, if the customer is a company, it will likely transfer the cost to its clients. For example, if an Internet provider has to pay a fee for every direct debit it receives from its clients, it will increase its charges, goes the argument.
The Commission has in fact challenged the legality of multilateral interchange fees imposed by Visa (EurActiv 27/03/08) and Mastercard (EurActiv 04/03/08) on international card transactions, based on the same argument that consumers are being unfairly penalised.
But now the Commission is saying such fees are legitimate, provided that they are justified by banks' actual costs and are limited in time.
Moreover, the fees applied to SEPA transactions may not be higher that those used at national level by the existing systems, which will be gradually replaced.
Nevertheless, both consumers and SMEs are unhappy with the measure, considering it as a negative signal which is not fully justified.




