EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

EU plans tax on bank capital

Published 25 May 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend by email

The European Commission will propose a European emergency fund paid for by the financial sector to rescue failing banks and fend off future crises.

A levy on banks - or in EU speak, a "resolution fund" - has been in the pipeline for a few months and has proven a popular idea with the French, German and British governments.

The EU's internal market commissioner, Michel Barnier, is expected to unveil proposals tomorrow (26 May) to establish a European super-fund of national resolution funds, an idea that enjoys the full backing of the German government, which has adopted the toughest stance on financial reform lately.

France and Britain, on the other hand, argue that the revenues should go into national coffers.

Barnier said in an earlier proposal (EurActiv 22/03/10) that he would prefer to see a tax on banks' balance sheets, and not on transactions via a so-called 'Tobin Tax', which has curried much favour in the German and Austrian national parliaments.

Barnier will probably leave it up to countries themselves to decide whether the tax should be imposed on assets, liabilities or profits, according to Commission sources.

The EU's resolution fund has also received backing from the head of the International Monetary Fund, Dominique Strauss Kahn.

"Instead of disputing the role of this or that national authority in the event of the collapse of a cross-border financial institution, the problem should be solved at its roots," Strauss-Kahn told Brussels policymakers last month.

''The banking system should be pre-funded by the industry itself, through a mix of tariffs on deposit guarantees and taxes on the relevant financial institutions,'' the IMF director added.

However, some EU observers who lament the passing of a watered-down financial reform bill in the US fear that the EU may be alone in taking a tougher course to reform the financial sector.

A Wall Street source said that the Dodd Bill, which expands US government oversight of the increasingly complex banking system and financial markets, will do little to change the status quo.

"It'll crimp the profit pool initially by 15 or 20% and increase oversight and compliance costs, but there's no break-up of any institution or onerous new taxes," the anonymous US source is quoted as saying in the American press.

Critics of the bill worry that it will not disincentivise the kind of risk-taking that caused the financial crisis in the first place.

Of all the financial reforms on the table, a tax on banks' gains has been one of the most feared within the sector, as bankers worry it would curb their lending capacity by reducing the capital on their books.

In addition, EU finance ministers announced last week that they would seek to raise the fees of state guarantees for the sector (EurActiv 17/05/10).

The European Banking Federation, an umbrella group of the EU's banks, said that the tax would overlap with other regulatory changes coming out of Brussels and do little to improve the stability of the financial system.

Positions: 

"Implementing bank levies alone, without taxing financial transactions, risks pushing financial activities into the shadow banking system," argues Sony Kapoor, founder of the influential Re-Define think-tank.

The European Savings Bank Group said that its members did not cause the crisis and therefore do not see why they should be paying for the irresponsible behaviour of other financial institutions.

"ESBG members have never abandoned their support to the real economy and have been returning a part of their profits to society since their creation," the association said in a statement.

British bank HSBC backed the plan for a bank levy on the condition that the funds raised are put into government-sponsored venture capital agencies to ensure that banks have the capacity to lend to small and medium-sized businesses, which are currently struggling to access loans.

Representatives of the German and French banking industries have come out against the idea of a levy.

"[A tax] would not be able to prevent a future crisis," said Andreas Schmitz, president of the German Banks Association, warning that it would drive investors to other countries that did not impose such a levy.

He was backed by French Banking Federation Director-General Pierre de Lauzun, who said a multinational tax would stunt economic growth and would fail to win the support of G20 powers such as Canada, Brazil and China.

Background: 

The idea of making banks and other financial institutions pay for failings in the sector is not new.

The Group of Twenty (G20) has already called for a framework to prevent and cope with future financial crises on several occasions, with which the private sector would be actively involved.

EU Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier has made clear that he will not refrain from taking a tough stance against the private sector if necessary.

Unlike his predecessor, Irish free-market champion Charlie McCreevy, Barnier has already stated that he does not believe in self-regulation (EurActiv 19/03/10). A wave of new financial rules is expected.

In his first few months, the French commissioner has revised a proposal on capital held on banks' balance sheets – the Capital Requirements Directive IV – and has begun to clamp down on the derivatives market.

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising

Sponsors

Advertising

Advertising