EurActiv Logo
EU news & policy debates
- across languages -
Bulgaria News
Turkey News
Germany News
Spain News
France News
United Kingdom News
Poland News
Czech Republic News
Slovakia News
Hungary News
Romania News
Serbia News
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Network

BROWSE ALL SECTIONS

New Afghanistan strategy brings moderate Taliban 'on board'

Published 28 January 2010 - Updated 01 February 2010
Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

Facing a make-or-break year in Afghanistan, ministers from some 60 countries are meeting today (28 January) in London to hammer out a strategy to try to bring an end to the war. According to reports, the key to the new strategy is bringing moderate Taliban "on board".

The London conference is expected to back efforts to win over Taliban foot soldiers with money and jobs, and review a UN terrorism blacklist to encourage fighters to change sides. 

This, combined with a fresh commitment to development and the influx of an extra 30,000 US troops, is meant to break a stalemate in a war now into its ninth year. 

"We will see at the end of this year the light on the horizon," NATO military chief Admiral Giampaolo Di Paola said after a NATO meeting in Brussels on Wednesday. 

Western governments are hoping a final military and civilian push will put them into a position of strength to begin drawing down troops in 2011 and to negotiate a political settlement. 

With public opinion wearying of war, attention is already turning to an eventual exit strategy involving a political settlement with the Taliban leadership - although officials stress that this is not yet on the cards. 

"We are not going to negotiate with the Taliban now, and if there's going to be any movement on this issue, the Taliban will have to sever all contact with al Qaeda and this is a critical point," US special envoy Richard Holbrooke said. 

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said that any reconciliation with Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar was "probably a bridge too far" after he gave safe haven to al Qaeda to launch the 9/11 attacks on the United States. 

"He has the blood of thousands of Americans on his hands," he told reporters in Washington. 

But with the United States also stressing it will be up to the Afghans to decide how to reconcile their country's warring factions, many argue that the question of involving Mullah Omar is more a matter of timing than principle. 

"No plan will work without him," said retired Brigadier Sultan Amir Tarar, a former senior member of Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) agency. 

"He's respected by Afghans for resisting foreign occupation. How can he be sidelined or dumped at a time when Taliban are winning the war?" he told Reuters. 

War weary 

Afghan President Hamid Karzai is expected to seek support in London both for a plan to win over foot soldiers - something that has had little success in the past - and to hold a Loya Jirga, a council of elders to discuss broader reconciliation. 

The Taliban have so far shown no willingness in public to enter peace talks, though some analysts argue they too are tired of the fighting, and realise they are no better placed than the Americans to win power by military means alone. 

The Taliban, in comments posted on one of their websites on Wednesday, renewed a demand that foreign troops leave Afghanistan and dismissed plans to win over individual fighters as a trick. 

But they also repeated a statement made by Mullah Omar late last year that they posed no threat to the West - a possible signal of a greater willingness to break with al Qaeda. 

Britain is also hoping to use the conference to convince regional players to cooperate rather than compete over Afghanistan, the battleground for proxy wars for 30 years. 

Among those attending are the foreign ministers of India and Pakistan, which have long competed for influence in Afghanistan. 

(EurActiv with Reuters.) 

Positions: 

Afghan President Hamid Karzai said that his country needs another five years before it can take charge of its own security. 

"Afghanistan wants to soon be defending its own territory, its own people, with Afghan means," he said, quoted by ABC. 

"We have a journey to complete together towards that end of the Afghan security forces finding the ability and the capacity to provide security for the Afghan people." 

Nazif Shahrani, professor of anthropology in the Department of Central Asian and Middle Eastern Studies at Indiana University, has expressed doubt about the plan. 

"Why should the Taliban come and join now that they are in a much stronger position than they were," he said. 

Professor Shahrani says there is also no sign of a formula for negotiating with the Taliban leadership. 

"The only formula that's available is the old Bonn formula of basically allocating certain number of ministerial posts and maybe deputy ministers and so forth to a particular interest group." 

"The Taliban already have quite a few supporters in Karzai's government so why should they come for more or where would those ministries come from anyway. If he's giving it to Taliban he'll be taking it from somebody else." 

The professor says there have been talks with lower level Taliban leaders in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, which could yield a more concrete announcement in London. 

But the professor says Hamid Karzai still faces several other challenges, as the re-elected president is still struggling to secure approval for all his cabinet nominations and faces rampant corruption. 

Background: 

When US President Barack Obama took office, the European Union appeared eager to engage more in Afghanistan, especially in the field of nation-building (EurActiv 23/02/09). 

The EU launched EUPOL Afghanistan in June 2007. For the Afghan presidential election, the EU largely funded efforts estimated to cost over $200 million. 

More than 40 countries have sent troops to Afghanistan under NATO's banner, with the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Poland providing the most European soldiers. 

Last September, European defence ministers expressed reluctance to send more troops to the NATO-led mission in Afghanistan, anticipating their response to a possible US call for reinforcements (EurActiv 29/09/09). 

Obama faced scepticism in Congress over his recent decision to send an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan (EurActiv 02/12/09). 

More on this topic

More in this section

Advertising