EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Les gouvernements européens divisés sur les droits de douane pour les chaussures asiatiques

Publié 29 août 2006 - Mis à jour 31 août 2006
Version imprimableSend by email

La Commission devrait maintenir son plan visant à imposer un droit de douane supplémentaire sur les chaussures chinoises et vietnamiennes, en dépit du rejet de sa proposition lors d'un vote préliminaire.

The suggestion is Mandelson’s second proposal in two months to bridge an agreement between free marketeers such as Britain, Denmark, Germany and Sweden – who strongly oppose the imposition of protectionist tariffs that would harm trade relations with China and raise prices for consumers – and shoe manufacturing countries such as Italy, Spain, France, Poland and Portugal, who are pressuring the Commission to act after investigations showed that Vietnamese and Chinese manufacturers are benefiting from low-cost financing and tax breaks to create unfair competition. 

So far, free traders are winning the battle. Government officials from 14 Member States rejected the proposal in a provisional vote on 3 August in an anti-dumping advisory committee. 

Nevertheless, Mandelson has decided to stick to the proposal and will present it to his fellow Commissioners on 30 August 2006. His spokesman Peter Power said: “We have to find the middle ground… If that middle ground can't be found it won't be for lack of effort on the part of European Commission - it just means that middle ground can't be found.” 

Mr Aberto Silvio Bichi, secretary-general of the European Federation of Sporting Goods Industries, which represents manufacturers like Adidas and Nike that import shoes from Asia, said the federation’s “number one priority is to have no duties whatsoever”. 

And this could be the result if Member States fail to resolve their split before 6 October 2006, when the preliminary anti-dumping duties introduced in April will end, allowing cheaper shoes to flow into Europe. 

Réactions : 

Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson’s spokesman Peter Power says the Commission’s position “is based on a factual, thorough investigation and a proper calculation of injury caused by dumping”. 

Mandelson is now looking to find some “middle ground” but will not “be involved in any arm-twisting of member states”, according to Power. “It's up to those who are keen on our proposal to get their troops in order… Clearly the vote will be very tight.” 

Mr. Bichi, secretary-general of the European Federation of Sporting Goods Industries (FESI), said that, although he would prefer no additional tariffs to be imposed, he understood the need to find a “balanced solution” which takes the concerns of EU manufacturers into account. But, he stressed, “no duties should be imposed on children’s shoes”, as such a measure would hurt Europe’s poorer families with children most. 

The FESI also called for a rapid solution to the issue, saying uncertainty and unpredictability is damaging business. 

Chinese companies claim they are merely benefiting from the abolition of quotas and are lobbying their government to take the EU to the WTO. 

Deputy Trade Minister Phan The Rue of Vietnam said the proposed 10% anti-dumping duty is “unjustified and groundless,” and goes against the spirit of trade liberalisation. The proposed duties would not only hamper Vietnamese businesses but also hurt consumers in the EU. 

It also works “against the goal of eradicating hunger and alleviating poverty” in Vietnam and undermines the development of relations between Vietnam and the EU, he said. 

Read this article in Czech  (EurActiv.cz)

Read this article in Hungarian  (EurActiv.hu)

Read this artcle in Slovak  (EurActiv.sk)

Contexte : 

After imposing anti-dumping tariffs on leather shoes from Vietnam and China to counter a sudden flood of imports (see Euractiv 24 March 2006), the Commission is now looking for a follow-up plan. 

The initial anti-dumping charges (respectively 19.4% and 16.8% for all shoes originating in China and Vietnam, except children's shoes) were introduced in April 2006 after investigations suggested that the two Asian countries were exporting footwear at below-cost prices.

The measures however are only valid for a six-month period and the Commission must now come up with a solution that satisfies both European manufacturers and importers, while maintaining good trade relations with its Asian partners. 

Member States in July rejected the Commission’s first proposal to solve the issue by introducing a deferred duty system that would allow 80% of Chinese and Vietnamese shoes to enter the EU free of any anti-dumping duty, with shoes entering above that allowance being subject to higher tariffs (see Euractiv 5 July 2006). 

Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson is now suggesting a blanket tariff of 10% on imports from Vietnam and 16.5% on China. The measure could last five years if accepted. 

More in this section

Publicité