EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Un plan d'aide pour la biodiversité proposé par une ONG

Publié 25 mai 2010
Étiquettes
biodiversity
Version imprimableSend by email

A l'occasion de la Journée mondiale de la Biodiversité, célébrée samedi (22 mai), l'ONG environnementale BirdLife International a affirmé que le manque d'intérêt politique pour la biodiversité et le manque de financements constituaient les principales causes de l'échec européen à stopper la dégradation écologique.

Despite the EU's general failure to deliver on its target of halting biodiversity loss throughout the Union by 2010, the NGO stresses that the many examples of best practice and localised success stories show that "the EU already has powerful conservation tools and, where there is political will to implement science-backed action, the results invariably follow" (EurActiv 17/12/08).

BirdLife's new report on the EU's progress towards halting biodiversity loss sets out a number of specific recommendations for resolving the biodiversity crisis. These are grouped under four main headings: governance and legislation, investing in natural capital, building green infrastructure and addressing the drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem loss.

Mainstreaming biodiversity into other policies

The BirdLife rescue plan for Europe's biodiversity underlines the need for stronger enforcement of existing EU legislation, such as the Birds and Habitats Directives. But it also suggests developing specific 2020 biodiversity strategies for key sectoral policies, such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP).

Sectoral EU strategies for the next ten years could "re-energise the process of involving stakeholders in achieving EU biodiversity policy, minimise conflicts and commit both industry and authorities to better implementation and financing," the report argues.

Consequently, more funding and new tools to improve financial streams for biodiversity protection are also needed to develop and implement new policies, the study adds.

Finally, the report suggests that efficient land-use policies are needed to ensure that new infrastructure and urban development does not lead to biodiversity loss. Biodiversity footprint considerations in product labelling and public procurement would encourage sustainable consumption and production, it adds.

Need for appropriate targets and indicators

The document also proposes a list of measurable targets and indicators, which would allow progress to be tracked throughout the EU. The report already includes a simple overview table, which uses a traffic light system to present average scores for different EU member states regarding a number of indicators.

While the countries' scores vary depending on the indicator, which are ranked from red to green, not one EU member states was given the green light as its final score.

Prochaines étapes : 
  • 2010: International Year of Biodiversity.
  • October 2010: International negotiations on new global post-2010 biodiversity vision and targets, in Nagoya, Japan.
  • By end of 2010: Commission to present EU 2020 biodiversity strategy.
  • 2010: Commission pushing for establishment of UN Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).
Contexte : 

According to a European Commission report on the implementation of the EU's Biodiversity Action Plan, the EU did not even come close to achieving its target of halting biodiversity loss by 2010 (EurActiv 17/12/08). 

The report states that 50% of all species and up to 80% of habitat types in need of protection in Europe have "unfavourable conservation" status, which indicates species decline. The same goes for over 40% of European bird species. 

In its January 2010 paper, the Commission outlined four policy options for EU action after 2010. EU-27 environment ministers opted in March for the strongest of the options, which calls for "halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020, and restoring them in so far as feasible, while stepping up the EU contribution to averting global biodiversity loss".

This option was endorsed by EU heads of state and government in March.

A lire aussi

More in this section

Publicité