EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Click here for EU news »
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Un rapport de l'UE en faveur du commerce des polluants atmosphériques

Version imprimable
Send by email
Publié 15 mars 2010

Après avoir adopté le commerce du carbone pour combattre le changement climatique, la Commission européenne envisage désormais un système d'échange à l'échelle de l'UE pour le dioxyde de soufre (SO2) et le dioxyde d'azote (NOx) afin d’améliorer la qualité de l'air.

A draft study assessing the environmental and economic impacts of such a system was recently made public.

SO2 and NOx are atmospheric pollutants that cause acid rain, smog and related respiratory health problems. They are typically byproducts of fossil fuel combustion in the chemical and power sectors.

But EU employers' association BusinessEurope has warned that an an EU-wide trading scheme "cannot be the way forward" as these pollutants are already dealt with under existing EU directives. 

"An EU-wide trading scheme would bring double regulation and unnecessary costs," the association warned in a letter to the European Commission.

The report, compiled over the past 12 months by Entec UK Limited, an environmental and engineering consultancy, concludes that "most trading scenarios" would be less costly than a planned industrial emissions directive (IED), which was used as the reference scenario for the study.

"This is because under trading, there is access to a wider range of cost-effective abatement options across member states and installations within the trading zone," the study notes.

Such a system would also be cheaper than the current Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive, the Commission observes.

Follow-up study

SO2 and NOx emission trading schemes could potentially replace the proposed IED for the pollutants concerned in certain sectors, according to the Commission. The scheme could also replace the individual permitting system based on Best Available Techniques (BATs) laid down in the 1996 IPPC Directive, which is currently under review.

The study assessed various design options for potential NOx and SO2 cap-and-trade systems, considering a number of different aspects such as the cap level, the number of trading zones, the allocation method and the cost-effectiveness of each of the scenarios.

While a report assessing the possible development of EU-wide NOx and SO2 trading schemes for IPPC installations is currently being finalised, the EU executive has already launched another study to evaluate the economics of such schemes.

The study should be finalised by early 2011.

Réactions : 

BusinessEurope, the EU employers' organisation, stresses that the study "does not make a convincing case and does not provide clear and satisfactory responses on a number of pivotal elements, such as the risk of double regulation, costs for industry or workability of the ETS for NOx and SO2".

The business organisation believes that the IPPC regime must remain the preferred policy instrument for regulating industrial emissions of NOx and SO2.

It further notes that the draft final report also contains a number of inaccuracies and methodological approximations regarding policy baselines, modelling approaches and sensitivity analysis.

Commenting on the study, the European Cement Association (Cembureau) added that the uncertainties in the assumptions are high and "the policy baseline is questionable," particularly as it "attempts to second-guess the outcome of two key items of air quality legislation: the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) and the National Emissions Ceilings (NEC) Directive, neither of which has been finalised".

The association further argues that the costs are unclear and underestimated, and environmental and health impacts are not properly addressed. Lastly, it points to the lack of analysis of the impact of a trading scheme on costs at either member-state or sectoral level, while "abatement costs will differ widely between sectors".

Prochaines étapes : 
  • Early 2011: Commission study to evaluate economic impact of emission trading schemes for NOx and SO2.
Contexte : 

According to the European Commission, market-based instruments such as environmental taxes, tradable permit systems and targeted subsidies are a cost-effective way of protecting the environment while providing incentives for industries to opt for greener production.

The EU executive's 2007 Green Paper on market-based instruments (MBI) explored options for more intensive use of MBIs in environmental and energy policy.

One of the ideas put forward in the green paper is "trading instruments to reduce local air pollution".

Several member states already use MBIs to address air pollution, in particular taxes and charges on sulphur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). The Netherlands, for example, already applies a trading system for NOx, on top of the EU directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC).

A lire aussi

More in this section

Publicité

Sponsors

Vidéos

Sustainable Development News videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Sustainable Development Promoted videos

Euractiv Sidebar Video Player for use in section aware blocks.

Publicité

Publicité