EurActiv Logo
Actualités & débats européens
- dans votre langue -
Actualités en Bulgarie
Actualités en Turquie
Actualité en Allemagne
Actualités en Espagne
Actualités en France
Actualités au Royaume-Uni
Actualités en Pologne
Actualités en République tchèque
Actualités en Slovaquie
Actualités en Hongrie
Actualités en Roumanie
Actualités en Serbie
Greece News
Italy News
Bulgaria Turkey Germany Spain France United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Hungary Romania Serbia Greece Italy
EurActiv.com Réseau

TOUTES LES RUBRIQUES

Commentaire : L'Europe ouvre ses portes à une Roumanie non réformée

Publié 03 octobre 2006
Étiquettes
corruption Romania
Version imprimableEnvoyer à un ami

Le professeur de l'université de Bradford, Tom Gallagher, expert sur la transition de la Roumanie vers la démocratie, analyse le manque de réformes du pays dans le Financial Times.

While European parliamentarians praised the progress and efforts made in Bulgaria and Romania on 26 September 2006, when the 1 January 2007 accession date was announcement, Tom Gallagher paints a darker picture of the state of reform and corruption in Romania. He calls the 15 years since the end of communism “years of lost opportunity for reform".

In fact, Gallagher is convinced that an elite of “ex-communist businessmen” who allegedly pull the strings in Romania might even see the 30 billion euro coming from the EU between now and 2012 as an incentive for corruption. He adds that further reforms in the right direction have had been blocked by parliament and rivalries within the ministries.

Turning to the state of the market economy, he claims that “the EU’s biggest error was to fail to ensure that vigour in the adoption of free market reforms was matched by a determination that the political conditions were also met". He says that reforms often took place only on paper, and underlines the crucial role of European investors pushing for early accession for Romania.

One of his main reproaches of the EU is that "it did not take on a tougher line on oversight and reform". Instead, he argues: “Brussels adopted an unimaginative approach to Romania’s problems, one that barely scratched the surface. It is hard to avoid the impression that the country is joining largely on the terms of a local elite that has often outsmarted Brussels functionaries.”

Gallagher concludes with an appeal to the EU for a tougher line on further enlargement. He says: “The EU’s record in Romania demands close scrutiny. Otherwise, applying the same lazy methodology of entry to the western Balkans and Turkey could have dire consequences for stability in a region where the EU is keen to project its modernising values."

Publicité